Cited by 370Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness Research

The hippocampus and related neocortical structures in memory transformation

Sekeres, Melanie J., Winocur, Gordon, Moscovitch, Morris·2018·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Episodic memories are multifaceted and malleable, capable of being transformed with time and experience at both the neural level and psychological level. At the neural level, episodic memories are transformed from being dependent on the hippocampus to becoming represented in neocortical structures, such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and back again, while at the psychological level, detailed, perceptually rich memories, are transformed to ones retaining only the gist of an experience or a schema related to it. Trace Transformation Theory (TTT) initially proposed that neural and psychological transformations are linked and proceed in tandem. Building on recent studies on the neurobiology of memory transformation in rodents and on the organization of the hippocampus and its functional cortical connectivity in humans, we present an updated version of TTT that is more precise and detailed with respect to the dynamic processes and structures implicated in memory transformation. At the heart of the updated TTT lies the long axis of the hippocampus whose functional differentiation and connectivity to neocortex make it a hub for memory formation and transformation. The posterior hippocampus, connected to perceptual and spatial representational systems in posterior neocortex, supports fine, perceptually rich, local details of memories; the anterior hippocampus, connected to conceptual systems in anterior neocortex, supports coarse, global representations that constitute the gist of a memory. Notable among the anterior neocortical structures is the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) which supports representation of schemas that code for common aspects of memories across different episodes. Linking the aHPC with mPFC is the entorhinal cortex (EC) which conveys information needed for the interaction/translation between gist and schemas. Thus, the long axis of the hippocampus, mPFC and EC provide the representational gradient, from fine to coarse and from perceptual to conceptual, that can implement processes implicated in memory transformation. Each of these representations of an episodic memory can co-exist and be in dynamic flux as they interact with one another throughout the memory's lifetime, going from detailed to schematic and possibly back again, all mediated by corresponding changes in neural representation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.006

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In young adults, perception of the childhood odorant leads to increased functional connectivity in the memory system, including dorsal hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and olfactory bulb.

    “the perception of the childhood odorant leads to an increased connectivity in the memory system, notably structures typically involved in autobiographical memory—the dorsal hippocampus, the prefrontal cortex—and olfactory memory—the orbitofrontal cortex and the olfactory bulb—both in humans and rodents [9,43,44].”
  • These findings challenge the Multiple Trace Theory, which posits that the dorsal hippocampus is constantly involved in episodic memory recall.

    “These findings challenge the Multiple Trace Theory, which posits that the dorsal hippocampus is constantly involved in episodic memory recall [44,71].”
  • Some spatial memories retain their detailed HPC representations in perpetuity, along with their schematic representation, and these representations interact with each other, with one or the other dominating depending on conditions including time since acquisition, task demands and retrieval cues.

    “However, some spatial memories retain their detailed HPC representations in perpetuity, along with their schematic representation, and these representations interact with each other, with one or the other dominating depending on various conditions, including time since acquisition, task demands and retrieval cues 92,93 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [93]

  • According to trace transformation theory, the hippocampus and distributed cortical regions encode distinct aspects of memory and engage in dynamic, bidirectional interactions throughout memory formation and retrieval.

    “According to trace transformation theory, the hippocampus and distributed cortical regions encode distinct aspects of memory and engage in dynamic, bidirectional interactions throughout memory formation and retrieval 19 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekeres, M. J., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Moscovitch, Morris
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
680
Pages
39-53
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802343044
Cited by
370
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 11
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes for Health Research (MGP 6694)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
memory transformation, episodic memory, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, entorhinal cortex, anterior hippocampus, posterior hippocampus, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, perceptual memory, cortical connectivity
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Prefrontal Cortex, Neocortex, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review