Cited by 24Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

Modulation of corticospinal excitability by reward depends on task framing

Open access
Mooshagian, Eric, Keisler, Aysha, Zimmermann, Trelawny, Schweickert, Janell M., Wassermann, Eric M.·2015·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Findings from previous transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments suggest that the primary motor cortex (M1) is sensitive to reward conditions in the environment. However, the nature of this influence on M1 activity is poorly understood. The dopamine neuron response to conditioned stimuli encodes reward probability and outcome uncertainty, or the extent to which the outcome of a situation is known. Reward uncertainty and probability are related: uncertainty is maximal when probability is 0.5 and minimal when probability is 0 or 1 (i.e., certain outcome). Previous TMS-reward studies did not examine these factors independently. Here, we used single-pulse TMS to measure corticospinal excitability in 40 individuals while they performed a simple computer task, making guesses to find or avoid a hidden target. The task stimuli implied three levels of reward probability and two levels of uncertainty. We found that reward probability level interacted with the trial search condition. That is, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, a measure of corticospinal neuron excitability, increased with increasing reward probability when participants were instructed to "find" a target, but not when they were instructed to "avoid" a target. There was no effect of uncertainty on MEPs. Response times varied with the number of choices. A subset of participants also received paired-pulse stimulation to evaluate changes in short-intracortical inhibition (SICI). No effects of SICI were observed. Taken together, the results suggest that the reward-contingent modulation of M1 activity reflects reward probability or a related aspect of utility, not outcome uncertainty, and that this effect is sensitive to the conceptual framing of the task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.021

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mooshagian, E., Keisler, A., Zimmermann, T., Schweickert, J. M., & Wassermann, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Henry M. Jackson Foundation (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wassermann, Eric M.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
68
Pages
31-37
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033090390
Cited by
24
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Henry M. Jackson Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (ZIANS002977)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
corticospinal excitability, reward probability, outcome uncertainty, primary motor cortex, task framing, motor evoked potentials, short-interval intracortical inhibition, reaction time (psychology)
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Probability, Pyramidal Tracts, Reward, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Uncertainty, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review