Cited by 229Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Patterns of mRNA and protein expression for 12 GABAA receptor subunits in the mouse brain

Open access
Hörtnagl, H., Tasan, R.O., Wieselthaler, A., Kirchmair, E., Sieghart, W., Sperk, G.·2013·Neuroscience

Abstract

The GABAA receptor is the main inhibitory receptor in the brain and its subunits originate from different genes or gene families (α1-α6, β1-β3, γ1-γ3, δ, ε, θ, π, or ρ1-3). In the mouse brain the anatomical distribution of GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs so far investigated is restricted to subunits forming benzodiazepine-sensitive receptor complexes (α1-α3, α5, β2, β3 and γ2) in the forebrain and midbrain as assessed by in situ hybridization (ISH). In the present study the anatomical distribution of the GABAA receptor subunits α1-α6, β1-β3, γ1-γ2 and δ was analyzed in the mouse brain (excluding brain stem) by ISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In several brain areas such as hippocampus, cerebellum, bulbus olfactorius and habenula we observed that mRNA levels did not reflect protein levels, indicating that the protein is located far distantly from the cell body. We also compared the distribution of these 12 subunit mRNAs and proteins with that reported in the rat brain. Although in general there is a considerable correspondence in the distribution between mouse and rat brains, several species-specific differences were observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.01.008

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • α5GABAARs are expressed at negligible levels in the CeA.

    “This finding is striking, as α5GABAARs are expressed at negligible levels in the CeA [35, 36]”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

  • α2GABAARs are densely expressed in the central amygdala.

    “α2-GABAARs are densely expressed in the central amygdala [35, 36, 40], but their precise cellular location and function are still unknown.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

  • α1, α2, α3, α4 and α5GABAARs are all expressed at moderate to high levels in the hippocampus.

    “α1, α2, α3, α4 and α5GABAARs are all expressed at moderate to high levels in the hippocampus (although at different relative levels in different subregions; [36])”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

  • α5GABAARs are expressed in the olfactory bulb, cortex, hippocampus, and granule cells within the cerebellum.

    “The potential α5-mediated circuitry involved in stress responsiveness can begin to be teased apart based on the localized expression pattern of α5GABAARs in the olfactory bulb, cortex, hippocampus, and granule cells within the cerebellum [36].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hörtnagl, H., Tasan, R. O., Wieselthaler, A., Kirchmair, E., Sieghart, W., & Sperk, G.
Affiliations
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Hörtnagl, H.
  • Sperk, G.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
236
Pages
345-372
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078682888
Cited by
229
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 8
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • S10204
  • P19464
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
GABAA receptor, receptor subunits, mRNA expression, protein expression, anatomical distribution, mouse brain, hippocampus, cerebellum, habenula, subcellular localization, species differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, GABA-A, RNA, Messenger, Species Specificity, In Situ Hybridization, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review