Cited by 91Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Modulation of anxiety and fear via distinct intrahippocampal circuits

Open access
Engin, Elif, Smith, Kiersten S, Gao, Yudong, Nagy, David, Foster, Rachel A, Tsvetkov, Evgeny, Keist, Ruth, Crestani, Florence +5 more·2016·eLife

Abstract

Recent findings indicate a high level of specialization at the level of microcircuits and cell populations within brain structures with regards to the control of fear and anxiety. The hippocampus, however, has been treated as a unitary structure in anxiety and fear research despite mounting evidence that different hippocampal subregions have specialized roles in other cognitive domains. Using novel cell-type- and region-specific conditional knockouts of the GABAA receptor α2 subunit, we demonstrate that inhibition of the principal neurons of the dentate gyrus or CA3 via α2-containing GABAA receptors (α2GABAARs) is required to suppress anxiety, while the inhibition of CA1 pyramidal neurons is required to suppress fear responses. We further show that the diazepam-modulation of hippocampal theta activity shows certain parallels with our behavioral findings, suggesting a possible mechanism for the observed behavioral effects. Thus, our findings demonstrate a double dissociation in the regulation of anxiety versus fear by hippocampal microcircuitry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.14120

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective knockout of α2GABAARs in DG or CA3 principal neurons abolishes the anxiolytic-like effects of systemically administered diazepam.

    “Selective knockout of α2GABAARs in DG or CA3 principal neurons abolishes the anxiolytic-like effects of systemically administered diazepam [43].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

  • Reduction of α2GABAAR activity selectively in the DG improves spatial memory.

    “Selective knockdown of α2GABAARs in CA1 pyramidal neurons improves contextual fear conditioning [43], whereas reduction of α2GABAAR activity selectively in the DG improves both object recognition [84] and spatial [50, 43] memory.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

  • Selective knockdown of α2GABAARs in CA1 pyramidal neurons improves contextual fear conditioning.

    “Selective knockdown of α2GABAARs in CA1 pyramidal neurons improves contextual fear conditioning [43], whereas reduction of α2GABAAR activity selectively in the DG improves both object recognition [84] and spatial [50, 43] memory.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engin, E., Smith, K. S., Gao, Y., Nagy, D., Foster, R. A., Tsvetkov, E., Keist, R., Crestani, F., Fritschy, J.-M., Bolshakov, V. Y., Hajos, M., Heldt, S. A., & Rudolph, U.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Section of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Engin, Elif
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-03-14
Volume
5
Pages
e14120-e14120
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2300274411
Cited by
91
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH080006, MH095905)
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (19266)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
anxiety, fear, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1 pyramidal neurons, conditional knockout, diazepam, hippocampal theta activity, double dissociation
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Brain Mapping, Fear, Hippocampus, Nerve Net, Receptors, GABA-A, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review