Cited by 192Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Regulating anxiety with extrasynaptic inhibition

Open access
Botta, Paolo, Demmou, Lynda, Kasugai, Yu, Markovic, Milica, Xu, Chun, Fadok, Jonathan P, Lu, Tingjia, Poe, Michael M +6 more·2015·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Aversive experiences can lead to complex behavioral adaptations including increased levels of anxiety and fear generalization. The neuronal mechanisms underlying such maladaptive behavioral changes, however, are poorly understood. Here, using a combination of behavioral, physiological and optogenetic approaches in mouse, we identify a specific subpopulation of central amygdala neurons expressing protein kinase C δ (PKCδ) as key elements of the neuronal circuitry controlling anxiety. Moreover, we show that aversive experiences induce anxiety and fear generalization by regulating the activity of PKCδ(+) neurons via extrasynaptic inhibition mediated by α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Our findings reveal that the neuronal circuits that mediate fear and anxiety overlap at the level of defined subpopulations of central amygdala neurons and demonstrate that persistent changes in the excitability of a single cell type can orchestrate complex behavioral changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4102

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective knockdown of α5GABAARs in the small CeA PKC-delta+ population leads to increased anxiety-like responses by increasing spontaneous activity of these neurons.

    “One group reported that selective knockdown of α5GABAARs in this small CeA population leads to increased anxiety-like responses by increasing the spontaneous activity of these neurons [4].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

  • α5GABAARs have been implicated in anxiety, fear and/or response to chronic stress.

    “In addition, γ2GABAARs [11], α1GABAARs [10, 12], α3GABAARs [13] (but see [14-16] for contradictory findings), and more recently, α5GABAARs [16-18, 4] have been implicated in anxiety, fear and/or response to chronic stress.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

  • α5GABAARs in a small neuronal population in the central amygdala can regulate anxiety behaviors.

    “However, a recent study showed that α5GABAARs in a small neuronal population in the central amygdala can regulate anxiety behaviors [4].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Franklin KJB Paxinos G The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates New York, NY Academic Press 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Botta, P., Demmou, L., Kasugai, Y., Markovic, M., Xu, C., Fadok, J. P., Lu, T., Poe, M. M., Xu, L., Cook, J. M., Rudolph, U., Sah, P., Ferraguti, F., & Lüthi, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lüthi, Andreas
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2015-08-31
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
1493-1500
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2157081213
Cited by
192
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-11-25)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL118561)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080006, R01MH096463)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS076517)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
anxiety, extrasynaptic inhibition, central amygdala, alpha5 GABA-A receptor, protein kinase C delta, fear generalization, aversive experience, neuronal excitability, optogenetics
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Conditioning, Classical, Disease Models, Animal, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Stress, Psychological, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Protein Kinase C-delta, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review