Cited by 313Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsTreatment of Major Depression

Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: Methodological replication and extension of

Open access
Dinga, Richard, Schmaal, Lianne, Penninx, Brenda W.J.H., van Tol, Marie Jose, Veltman, Dick J., van Velzen, Laura, Mennes, Maarten, van der Wee, Nic J.A. +1 more·2019·NeuroImage Clinical

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are highly heterogeneous, defined based on symptoms with little connection to potential underlying biological mechanisms. A possible approach to dissect biological heterogeneity is to look for biologically meaningful subtypes. A recent study Drysdale et al. (2017) showed promising results along this line by simultaneously using resting state fMRI and clinical data and identified four distinct subtypes of depression with different clinical profiles and abnormal resting state fMRI connectivity. These subtypes were predictive of treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy. OBJECTIVE: Here, we attempted to replicate the procedure followed in the Drysdale et al. study and their findings in a different clinical population and a more heterogeneous sample of 187 participants with depression and anxiety. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) Using the same procedure, can we find a statistically significant and reliable relationship between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms? 2) Is the observed relationship similar to the one found in the original study? 3) Can we identify distinct and reliable subtypes? 4) Do they have similar clinical profiles as the subtypes identified in the original study? METHODS: We followed the original procedure as closely as possible, including a canonical correlation analysis to find a low dimensional representation of clinically relevant resting state fMRI features, followed by hierarchical clustering to identify subtypes. We extended the original procedure using additional statistical tests, to test the statistical significance of the relationship between resting state fMRI and clinical data, and the existence of distinct subtypes. Furthermore, we examined the stability of the whole procedure using resampling. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: As in the original study, we found extremely high canonical correlations between functional connectivity and clinical symptoms, and an optimal three-cluster solution. However, neither canonical correlations nor clusters were statistically significant. On the basis of our extensive evaluations of the analysis methodology used and within the limits of comparison of our sample relative to the sample used in Drysdale et al., we argue that the evidence for the existence of the distinct resting state connectivity-based subtypes of depression should be interpreted with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101796

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To validate subtypes, one must use cross-validation, randomized holdouts, and/or independent testing to avoid overfitting.

    “To validate subtypes, one must be very careful to use cross-validation, randomized holdouts, and/or independent testing to avoid overfitting (54).”

    From Methods and challenges for assessing heterogeneity (2020) · cites this paper as [54]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinga, R., Schmaal, L., Penninx, B. W. J. H., van Tol, M. J., Veltman, D. J., van Velzen, L., Mennes, M., van der Wee, N. J. A., & Marquand, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Dinga, Richard
Venue
NeuroImage Clinical
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
Volume
22
Pages
101796
ISSN
2213-1582 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2923495490
Cited by
313
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 2
FWCI
25.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage Clinical (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Rivierduinen
  • Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek van de Gezondheidszorg
  • ZonMw (10-000-1002)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.156.077, 016.156.415)
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
  • GGZ Friesland
  • GGZ inGeest
  • Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression subtypes, resting-state functional connectivity, canonical correlation analysis, hierarchical clustering, anxiety
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Brain, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review