Cited by 50Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Toward Robust Anxiety Biomarkers: A Machine Learning Approach in a Large-Scale Sample

Open access
Boeke, Emily A., Holmes, Avram J., Phelps, Elizabeth A.·2020·Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Abstract

Background The field of psychiatry has long sought biomarkers that can objectively diagnose patients, predict treatment response, or identify individuals at risk of illness onset. However, reliable psychiatric biomarkers have yet to emerge. The recent application of machine learning techniques to develop neuroimaging-based biomarkers has yielded promising preliminary results. However, much of the work in this domain has not met best practice standards from the field of machine learning. This is especially true for studies of anxiety, creating uncertainty about the potential for anxiety biomarker development. Methods We applied machine learning tools to predict trait anxiety from neuroimaging measurements in humans. Using publicly available data from the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project, we compared a suite of neuroimaging-based machine learning models predicting anxiety within a discovery sample (n = 531, 307 women) via k-fold cross-validation, and we tested the final model (a stacked model incorporating region-to-region functional connectivity, amygdala seed-to-voxel connectivity, and volumetric and cortical thickness data) in a held-out, unseen test sample (n = 348, 209 women). Results Though the best model was able to predict anxiety within the discovery sample (cross-validated R 2 of .06, permutation test p < .001), the generalization test within the holdout sample failed (R 2 of -.04, permutation test p > .05). Conclusions In this study, we did not find evidence of a generalizable anxiety biomarker. However, we encourage other researchers to investigate this topic, utilizing large samples and proper methodology, to clarify the potential of neuroimaging-based anxiety biomarkers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.018

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boeke, E. A., Holmes, A. J., & Phelps, E. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Phelps, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
799-807
ISSN
2451-9022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951971452
Cited by
50
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety biomarkers, trait anxiety, functional connectivity, cortical thickness, brain volumetry, model generalization, women
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Anxiety, Brain, Female, Humans, Biomarkers, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review