The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda
Open accessAbstract
While there is a lot of literature from a natural or technical sciences perspective on different forms of digitalization in agriculture (big data, internet of things, augmented reality, robotics, sensors, 3D printing, system integration, ubiquitous connectivity, artificial intelligence, digital twins, and blockchain among others), social science researchers have recently started investigating different aspects of digital agriculture in relation to farm production systems, value chains and food systems. This has led to a burgeoning but scattered social science body of literature. There is hence lack of overview of how this field of study is developing, and what are established, emerging, and new themes and topics. This is where this article aims to make a contribution, beyond introducing this special issue which presents seventeen articles dealing with social, economic and institutional dynamics of precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming or agriculture 4.0. An exploratory literature review shows that five thematic clusters of extant social science literature on digitalization in agriculture can be identified: 1) Adoption, uses and adaptation of digital technologies on farm; 2) Effects of digitalization on farmer identity, farmer skills, and farm work; 3) Power, ownership, privacy and ethics in digitalizing agricultural production systems and value chains; 4) Digitalization and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS); and 5) Economics and management of digitalized agricultural production systems and value chains. The main contributions of the special issue articles are mapped against these thematic clusters, revealing new insights on the link between digital agriculture and farm diversity, new economic, business and institutional arrangements both on-farm, in the value chain and food system, and in the innovation system, and emerging ways to ethically govern digital agriculture. Emerging lines of social science enquiry within these thematic clusters are identified and new lines are suggested to create a future research agenda on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0. Also, four potential new thematic social science clusters are also identified, which so far seem weakly developed: 1) Digital agriculture socio-cyber-physical-ecological systems conceptualizations; 2) Digital agriculture policy processes; 3) Digitally enabled agricultural transition pathways; and 4) Global geography of digital agriculture development. This future research agenda provides ample scope for future interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary science on precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018 · Cited by 3,089
Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World
Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., et al. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05873-180226 · Cited by 1,099
Rotz, S., Gravely, E., Mosby, I., Duncan, E., Finnis, E., Horgan, M., LeBlanc, J., Martin, R., Neufeld, H. T., Nixon, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023 · Cited by 557
Dick, A., Bhandari, B., & Prakash, S. (2019) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.03.005 · Cited by 264
3D food printing: a categorised review of inks and their development
Voon, S. L., An, J., Wong, G., Zhang, Y., & Chua, C. K. (2019) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2019.1603508 · Cited by 175
Jansen, K., & Vellema, S. (2011) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2010.11.003 · Cited by 122
Dumont, B., Groot, J. C. J., & Tichit, M. (2018) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731118001350 · Cited by 122
Agent-based modeling of environment-migration linkages: a review
Thober, J., Schwarz, N., & Hermans, K. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10200-230241 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
Self-citationKlerkx, L., & Begemann, S. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901 · Cited by 354
Self-citationPatterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review
Hackfort, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212345 · Cited by 186
Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework
Wolfert, S., Verdouw, C., van Wassenaer, L., Dolfsma, W., & Klerkx, L. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103558 · Cited by 137
Self-citationNewton, J. E., Nettle, R., & Pryce, J. E. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102811 · Cited by 94
Exploring farmers’ decisions to engage in grass measurement on dairy farms in Ireland
Regan, Á., Douglas, J., Maher, J., & O’Dwyer, T. (2021) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2020.1858892 · Cited by 25
Farm Advisory Services and total factor productivity growth in the Irish dairy sector
Parikoglou, I., Emvalomatis, G., Thorne, F., & Wallace, M. (2023) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbac024 · Cited by 8
Radauer, A., Searle, N., & Bader, M. A. (2023) · World Patent Information · doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102183 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P.
- Venue
- NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 90-91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 1573-5214 (ISSN-L)
- 2212-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2990272218
- Cited by
- 1,307
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 165.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.