The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“decreased intentions to 1 volunteer for a charity [13]”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R. G., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. G. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 · Cited by 1,518
The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232 · cited 2×
“For example, recent research has shown that reading information about specific conspiracy theories can decrease people's intention to vote and vaccinate (Jolley & Douglas, 2014).”
ResultGoertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 1×
“For example, a number of recent studies have revealed that belief in one conspiracy is highly predictive of belief in other conspiracies (Goertzel, 1994; Swami et al., 2011).”
ResultConspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x · Cited by 1,050 · cited 1×
“Indeed , while some conspiracy theories are merely false, others are based on beliefs that are not only false but also harmful (Maibach, 2012; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 · Cited by 693
Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion
Oliver, J., & Wood, T. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12084 · Cited by 689
The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489 · Cited by 661
Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611434786 · Cited by 660
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 389
Fake News and Social Media Censorship
Adetayo, A. J. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-6474-5.ch004 · Cited by 10
Are rules made to be broken? Conspiracy exposure promotes aggressive behavior
Poon, K., Chan, R. S. W., & Lai, H. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12947 · Cited by 11
Lewandowsky, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0010 · Cited by 12
Investigating Memorization of Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation
Levy, S., Saxon, M., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.416 · Cited by 18
Expectations about the “Natural Order of Things” and Conspiracy Beliefs about COVID-19
Giacomantonio, M., Pellegrini, V., Cristofaro, V. D., Brasini, M., & Mancini, F. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19159499 · Cited by 10
Schwaiger, L. (2022) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.14361/9783839461211 · Cited by 56
Dorling, D., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-36-64 · Cited by 8
Mang, V., Epstude, K., & Fennis, B. M. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112481 · Cited by 11
The effect of scientific conspiracy theories on scepticism towards biotechnologies
Marques, M. D., Kerr, J. R., Stukas, A. A., & McLennan, J. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625241300896 · Cited by 9
“…emphasising the vested interests of corporations associated with emissions reduction decreased the strength of their belief in anthropogenic climate change (van der Linden, 2015), especially when it involved an unfamiliar (and controversial) technology such as carbon capture (Bolsen et al., 2022).”
InfluentialBelief in Science‐Related Conspiracy Theories
Littrell, S., Diekman, A. B., Seelig, M. I., Premaratne, K., Wuchty, S., Verdear, D., Klofstad, C., & Uscinski, J. E. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.70004 · Cited by 14
Future Actions towards Climate Change: The Role of Threat Perception and Emotions
Aguilar‐Luzón, M. D. C., Carmona, B., & Loureiro, A. (2023) · European Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p379 · Cited by 9
The Conspiratorial Style in Turkish Politics
Nefes, T. S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0026 · Cited by 9
Conspiracy Thinking, Tolerance, and Democracy
Smallpage, S. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0012 · Cited by 9
Piejka, A., & Okruszek, Ł. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3687 · Cited by 15
The Information Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theory: Examining the QAnon Narrative on FacebookPreprint
Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wku5b · Cited by 10
«3D-модель» российской экономики
Chepurenko, A. Y. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-118-128 · Cited by 8
Kay, C. S., & Slovic, P. (2025) · Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) · doi:10.1177/10731911251319933 · Cited by 7
“…are less likely to vote (Butler et al., 1995), vaccinate (Jolley & Douglas, 2014), and engage in behaviors intended to combat climate change (Van der Linden, 2015), as well as being more likely to harbor prejudicial beliefs (Kay, 2024a; Sapountzis & Condor, 2013) and hold favorable…”
Rode, J. B., Remshard, M., Groot, L. J., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101521 · Cited by 9
“Against this backdrop of overwhelming scientific agreement, the politicization of climate science [3,4] and the spread of climate disinformation have contributed to significant skepticism and confusion among the general public about this issue [5–7].”
Lin, X., Yan, L., & Xu, J. B. (2024) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2024.2323163 · Cited by 8
“Previous research has suggested that exposing respondents to conspiracy theories depicted in a questionnaire is sufficient to investigate their perspectives (Kim & Cao, 2016; van der Linden, 2015).”
Climate Change and Hybrid Warfare Strategies
Briggs, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Strategic Security · doi:10.5038/1944-0472.13.4.1864 · Cited by 8
Moon, C., & Travaglino, G. A. (2021) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909211056855 · Cited by 12
“In the context of global warming, Van der Linden (2015) showed that briefly exposing the public to a conspiracy theory may reduce general prosocial tendencies (e.g., donate or volunteer for a charity).”
BackgroundZelič, Ž., Berič, M., & Grum, D. K. (2022) · Studia Psychologica · doi:10.31577/sp.2022.01.844 · Cited by 10
Fauzi, A., Saefi, M., Adi, W. C., Kristiana, E., & Lestariani, N. (2022) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22339 · Cited by 11
Wang, X., & He, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938377 · Cited by 8
“It also increases the likelihood of accepting misleading claims (MacFarlane et al., 2020), resisting scientific evidence, or making associated poor health choices (van der Linden, 2015).”
BackgroundThe Truth Is Around Here Somewhere
Bost, P. R. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0018 · Cited by 8
Why the Powerful (in Weak States) Prefer Conspiracy Theories
Radnitz, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0023 · Cited by 8
Systematic review raises doubts about the effectiveness of framing in climate change communicationPreprint
Fesenfeld, L., Sun, Y., Wicki, M., McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-445613/v1 · Cited by 8
Hartmann, M., & Müller, P. (2021) · doi:10.31124/advance.16644889.v1 · Cited by 8
How Are Conspiracy Beliefs Associated with Generosity?Preprint
Alper, S., Toribio‐Flórez, D., Douglas, K. M., & Capraro, V. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fdyxr · Cited by 8
Stereotypes and social evaluations of scientists are related to different antecedents and outcomes
Gligorić, V., Clerc, R., Arkensteijn, G., Kleef, G. A. V., & Rutjens, B. T. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625241232097 · Cited by 7
“…and science attitudes has been well documented, so that individuals prone to conspiracy theories tend to reject scientific findings (Lewandowsky et al., 2013; Van der Linden, 2015; also see “conspirituality,” where a conspiratorial mind-set is merged with spirituality, Halafoff et al., 2022).”
BackgroundOu, M., & Ho, S. S. (2025) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2025.2539462 · Cited by 7
“For instance, individuals with stronger conspiracy beliefs have been shown to perceive greater risks associated with COVID-19 vaccination (Rosenthal & Cummings, 2021) and are more likely to discredit scientific evidence that challenges their views (van der Linden, 2015).”
Perceptions of Self-Motives and Environmental Activists’ Motives for Pro-Environmental Behavior
Geiger, N. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710656 · Cited by 3
“Further, as noted above, other work has revealed that many ascribe ulterior or sinister motives to environmental activists [33,39,63], which again, was not related to themes identified here.”
BackgroundKenny, J. (2023) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2023.2262431 · Cited by 7
“…in less democratic countries (Povitkina 2018), that autocracies more frequently utilise misinformation for shaping public opinion (Boese et al. 2022), and that consuming climate change misinformation is associated with a lower willingness to undertake climate action (Van Der Linden 2015).”
von Nordheim, G., Bettels-Schwabbauer, T., Königslöw, K. K., Barczyszyn-Madziarz, P., Budivska, H., Salvo, P. D., Dingerkus, F., Guazina, L. S., Asante, K. K., Kuś, M., et al. (2023) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565231203102 · Cited by 10
“…– for example, it lowers people ’ s willingness to engage in protective health behaviours (e.g. Freeman et al., 2020) or pro-environmental behaviours (Van der Linden, 2015), while leading to an increase in hatred and violence towards minorities (Pasek et al., 2015) – we consider the quality of…”
Critical Thinking and the Rejection of Unsubstantiated Claims
Bensley, D. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108684354.005 · Cited by 9
Populist Conspiracy Theories and Candidate Preference in the U.S.
Sawyer, P. S., & Sawyer, P. (2020) · ACTA POLITOLOGICA · doi:10.14712/1803-8220/12_2020 · Cited by 7
Can Stories Influence Sustainable Behavior?
Grant, L. K., & Forrest, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_12 · Cited by 7
(2017) · OECD economic surveys. Austria · doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-aut-2017-graph59-en · Cited by 9
Adekunle, T. B., Foote, J., Adekunle, T. E., TeBlunthuis, N., & Nelson, L. K. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/67968 · Cited by 6
Misperceptions, Depression, and Voting for Election Deniers in the United States
Baum, M., Druckman, J. N., Ognyanova, K., & Schulman, J. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edae024 · Cited by 5
“…health advice (e.g., masking, vaccination) (Jolley & Douglas, 2014; Oliver & Wood, 2014b; Romer & Jamieson, 2020), dismissing environmental threats (van der Linden, 2015), displaying hostility toward out-groups including political adversaries (Kennedy & Pronin, 2008), and supporting political…”
BackgroundHow belief in conspiracy theories could harm sustainability
van Prooijen, J., Šrol, J., & Maglić, M. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02243-0 · Cited by 6
“Moreover, experimentally exposing people to conspiracy theories asserting that climate change is a hoax decreases participants’ willingness to reduce their own carbon footprints (for example, use of public transport 26 ) and the likelihood of signing a petition to stop global warming 107 .”
The Information Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theory: Examining the QAnon Narrative on Facebook
Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579626 · Cited by 6
“Participating in and endorsing online conspiracy theory discussions is known to lead to rejection of science, unwillingness to involve in prosocial behaviors, and even extreme offline behaviors and violence [38, 40].”
BackgroundThe measurement and prediction of conspiracy beliefs
Rose, C. (2017) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17060408 · Cited by 6
Logemann, H. T., Rode, J. B., Maertens, R., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70022 · Cited by 9
“The Gateway Belief Model (GBM) developed by van der Linden et al. (2015) is a model of attitude change which emphasizes the positive impact of communicating scientific consensus, which subsequently leads to higher support for public action via key changes in corresponding cognitions and emotions…”
InfluentialThe Credulity of Conspiracy Theorists
Keeley, B. L. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0029 · Cited by 5
Determinants of Belief – And Unbelief – In Climate Change
Leiser, D., & Wagner‐Egger, P. (2022) · SpringerBriefs in climate studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85322-8_3 · Cited by 5
Alper, S., Yelbuz, B. E., & Konukoglu, K. (2023) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.33 · Cited by 5
“…with the GBM, underestimation of scientific consensus can lead to reduced support for policies aimed at addressing human-caused climate change (Ding et al., 2011) and hinder engagement in prosocial behaviors such as signing petitions or volunteering for charitable causes (van der Linden, 2015).”
Dong, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, X. J., & Jiang, J. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12758 · Cited by 5
Fortuna, A. M. D., & Picione, R. D. L. (2024) · Rivista di Psicologia Clinica · doi:10.3280/rpc1-2024oa17985 · Cited by 5
Mikheev, E. A., & Нестик, Т. А. (2021) · Институт психологии Российской академии наук Социальная и экономическая психология · doi:10.38098/ipran.sep.2021.21.1.002 · Cited by 6
Hebets, E. A., & Anderson, A. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.179978 · Cited by 5
“Climate change/global warming, for example, is a topic for which there is much false information circulating, creating challenges for efforts to help secure our planet’s future (van der Jo u rn al o f Ex p er im en ta lB io lo g y Linden, 2015).”
BackgroundThe Conspiracy Theory Pyramid Scheme
Goertzel, T. G. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0015 · Cited by 5
Don’t Trust the Scientists! Rejecting the Scientific Consensus “Conspiracy”
Josh Pasek, B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0013 · Cited by 5
Social Media Misinformation About Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change
Wright, K. B. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119751847.ch9 · Cited by 6
Misinformation-Based Beliefs Can Have Behavioral Consequences
Ecker, U. K. H., Tay, L. Q., Spearing, E. R., van der Linden, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2025) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2025.2482348 · Cited by 4
“…2024; Neil et al., 2021; Thorley et al., 2020) or eyewitness-identification decisions (Eisen et al., 2017), preventing action on climate change (van der Linden, 2015), or fueling violent attacks (Gupta & Wilkinson, 2018; Royster, 2017) or riots (Frenkel, 2021; Holden & Smout, 2024; Lee et al.,…”
Winter, K., Pummerer, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70030 · Cited by 5
“For instance, watching a climate change conspiracy video (compared to a pro-climate video and a neutral control condition) reduced the likelihood of study participants clicking on a link to sign a pro-environmental petition (van der Linden, 2015).”
Laurent, V., Kosinski, T., & Rusinek, S. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104094 · Cited by 4
Pummerer, L., Gkinopoulos, T., Douglas, K. M., Jolley, D., & Sassenberg, K. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2442906 · Cited by 8
“Such withdrawal from politics and society has also been reported in relation to conspiracy beliefs (e.g., Jolley & Douglas, 2014b; van der Linden, 2015).”
Thomas, E. F., Bird, L. H., & Quarisa, C. M. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2442937 · Cited by 4
“…provides evidence to suggest that there is a negative relationship between conspiracism and collective action (e.g., Jolley & Douglas, 2014; van der Linden, 2015), a positive relationship between conspiracism and collective action (e.g., Imhoff & Bruder, 2014; Thomas et al., 2024), no…”
Kim, J., Baek, J., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642221118283 · Cited by 3
Rizeq, J. (2020) · YorkSpace (York University) · Cited by 4
Čavojová, V., Šrol, J., & Mikušková, E. B. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xahdj · Cited by 4
Nera, K., Wagner‐Egger, P., Bertin, P., Douglas, K. M., & Klein, O. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/s37vy · Cited by 4
Illusory Conduct Stigma: Organizations As Targets As Well As Participants in Conspiracy Theories
Mithani, M. A. (2024) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503241303400 · Cited by 3
“However, this has started to change (Douglas et al., 2017; van der Linden, 2015; van Prooijen & Douglas, 2018).”
Unfounded beliefs, distress and powerlessness: A three‐wave longitudinal study
Mikušková, E. B., & Teličák, P. (2024) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12542 · Cited by 3
Sobieska, A., Hampel, M., Weidenspointner, R., Pauli, V., Pan, C., Jun, S.-M., & Gutsmiedl, P. (2025) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2025.2469936 · Cited by 3
“…that even brief exposure to conspiratorial content can have concerning effects, such as lower social and civic engagement and a greater likelihood of engaging in science rejection (Jolley & Douglas, 2014; Lewandowsky & Oberauer, 2016; Lewandowsky, Gignac, et al., 2013; van der Linden, 2015).”
Learning about Conspiracy Theories
Cullen, J. T. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0009 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy Theory Belief and Conspiratorial Thinking
Farhart, C. E. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.036 · Cited by 3
Quian, A., Elías, C., & Pérez, X. S. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.jul.13 · Cited by 4
Gagliardone, I., Pohjonen, M., Diepeveen, S., & Olaniran, S. (2023) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2239890 · Cited by 3
“More contemporary versions of these critiques of conspiracy theorising identify it as ‘ unscienti fi c ’ and even ‘ dangerous ’ (van der Linden, 2015).”
BackgroundLet's call! Using the phone to increase vaccine acceptance
Armand, A., Fracchia, M., & Vicente, P. C. (2023) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4760 · Cited by 4
“…in line with recent advancements in inoculation research that promote interventions’ flexibility and scalability by exposing participants to the manipulation techniques behind misinformation (Lewandowsky et al., 2013; Van der Linden, 2015; Brady et al., 2017; Roozenbeek and Van Der Linden, 2019).”
Evil perceptions but not entertainment value appraisals relate to conspiracy beliefs
Harmon‐Jones, E., Szymaniak, K., Edgeworth, D., Sebban, G., & Harmon‐Jones, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2024.1350584 · Cited by 3
Call it a conspiracy: How conspiracy belief predicts recognition of conspiracy theories
Prims, J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301601 · Cited by 5
“However, belief in conspiracy theories is correlated with risky health behaviors [19–22], neglect of environmental issues [23], and decreased political participation [21].”
BackgroundIt is all a conspiracy: Conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine
Myslivec, J. (2024) · Ceskoslovenska psychologie · doi:10.51561/cspsych.68.2.111 · Cited by 3
Watching for a snake in the grass: Objectification increases conspiracy beliefs.
Poon, K.-T., Chan, R. S. W., Lai, H.-S., Jiang, Y., & Teng, F. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12768 · Cited by 4
Belief in a Norm‐Consistent Climate Policy Conspiracy Theory and Non‐Normative Collective Action
Pummerer, L., Ditrich, L., Winter, K., & Sassenberg, K. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13094 · Cited by 5
How Epistemic Beliefs about Climate Change Predict Climate Change Conspiracy Beliefs
Nöth, L., & Zander, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523143 · Cited by 5
“Van der Linden (2015) explored the causal link between belief in CCCT and acceptance of climate science through an experiment.”
Filer, T. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0027 · Cited by 3
Identifying Conspiracy Theories News based on Event Relation Graph
Lei, Y., & Huang, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.656 · Cited by 2
Chao, F., Zhou, Q., Yu, G., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05772-1 · Cited by 2
“Exposure to conspiracy theories often reduces pro-social behaviours and erodes trust in scienti fi c information (Van der Linden 2015), thereby decreasing the likelihood of sharing debunking information.”
Kenix, L. J. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251366772 · Cited by 2
“Research from around the world has found that when Americans, for example, do not understand the factual causes of a problem, many simply disengage (Lewandowsky et al., 2013), whereas Australians respond by reducing their prosocial intentions (van der Linden, 2015).”
Testing the impact of fallacies and contrarian claims in climate change misinformation
Lieu, R., Hayes, O. R., & Cook, J. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70049 · Cited by 2
Конспирологическое мышление: понятие, измерение и факторы
Kazun, A. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-91-117 · Cited by 5
Vaccine-related conspiracy and counter-conspiracy narratives. Silencing effects
Corbu, N., Buturoiu, R., Frunzaru, V., & Guiu, G. (2023) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2022-0022 · Cited by 2
Diržytė, A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152215722 · Cited by 2
Lin, X., & Yan, L. (2023) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2023.2293799 · Cited by 2
“Although previous studies have revealed a relation between conspi-racy belief and negative behavior (Jolley & Douglas, 2014; van der Linden, 2015), the role of political engagement in mediating the belief – intention relationship has rarely been investigated.”
BackgroundResultThe Relationship Between Social Media Usage and Responses to Hoax and Hate Speech in Padang
Lestari, Y., Elian, N., Diego, D., Anindya, A., & Helmi, R. F. (2024) · Studies in Media and Communication · doi:10.11114/smc.v12i3.6682 · Cited by 2
“Research by Van der Linden (2015) and Roozenbeek & Van der Linden (2020) highlights that political ideology significantly influences individuals' perceptions of information, affecting whether they view it as real or a hoax.”
BackgroundCan Education Save Us From Ourselves? Three Psychological Challenges to Democracy
Clark, C. H., & Schmeichel, M. (2024) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543241288245 · Cited by 4
“In a study of 316 adults, van der Linden (2015) found that individuals exposed to a conspiracy video about climate change were significantly less likely than individuals who were exposed to a pro-climate-action message and those in a control group to believe that there was scientific consensus on…”
Dialogicality and Conspiracy Theory: The Coexistence of Conspiracist and Non‐Conspiracist Beliefs
Hall, M. S., Franks, B., & Bauer, M. W. (2025) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3120 · Cited by 3
Politricks: Teaching political tricks and discernment through active and passive tools
Hopkins, S.-A. M., Rayburn-Reeves, R. M., Lindemans, J. W., O’Gorrman, K. C., Vandewalker, I., Luebeck, C., & Sherlock, J. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf245 · Cited by 2
Chan, H., & Tam, K. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.70015 · Cited by 3
Fighting fire with fire: Prebunking with the use of a plausible meta‐conspiracy framing
Biddlestone, M., Green, R., Toribio-Flórez, D., de Gourville, D., Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70023 · Cited by 2
“Once again, in contrast to a well-established body of research (e.g. Biddlestone et al., 2022; Jolley & Douglas, 2014b; van der Linden, 2015), exposure to climate change conspiracy theories did not alter participants' climate conspiracy beliefs or intentions.”
CONSPIRACY BELIEF AND BEHAVIOR IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Ярош, Н. С., Artiukhova, V., & Zimovin, O. (2021) · BRAIN BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE · doi:10.18662/brain/12.2/200 · Cited by 3
Kognitivni prediktori oklijevanja s cijepljenjem protiv bolesti SARS-CoV-2 među mladima u Hrvatskoj
Rebernjak, B. (2023) · Socijalna psihijatrija · doi:10.24869/spsih.2023.123 · Cited by 2
“People who believe in conspiracy theories are less likely to be included in socially useful activities such as those aiming at preventing climate change (26) or at adhering to the measures prescribed in order to control the pandemic (27, 28).”
BackgroundThe Psychopathological Antecedents of Conspiracy Belief
Thresher-Andrews, C. (2020) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · doi:10.25602/gold.00030120 · Cited by 2
Hartmann, M., & Müller, P. (2021) · doi:10.31124/advance.16644889 · Cited by 2
Why do we argue about science? Exploring the psychological antecedents of rejection of science
Kerr, J. R. (2020) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17142374 · Cited by 2
Climate Change Denial & Skepticism: A Review of the Literature
Weddig, C. (2022) · doi:10.35650/mw.3043.d.2022 · Cited by 4
“This plan worked: conservatives are documented to be more likely to believe global warming is a hoax over adherents to other political ideologies (Van Der Linden 2015).”
BackgroundBefore Fighting, Know your Enemy: What do we Measure With our Scales of Conspiracism?Preprint
Bonetto, É., Arciszewski, T., & Delouvée, S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6yt8h · Cited by 2
Moving between two paradigms - sociocultural approach to research of conspiracy theories
Lukić, P. (2020) · Sociologija · doi:10.2298/soc2002193l · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Linden, S.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 171-173
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1199131209
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 82.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, global warming, climate change skepticism, prosocial behavior, environmental decision-making, charitable giving, petition signing, climate change denial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review