The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“decreased intentions to 1 volunteer for a charity [13]”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R. G., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. G. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 · Cited by 1,518
The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232 · cited 2×
“For example, recent research has shown that reading information about specific conspiracy theories can decrease people's intention to vote and vaccinate (Jolley & Douglas, 2014).”
ResultGoertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 1×
“For example, a number of recent studies have revealed that belief in one conspiracy is highly predictive of belief in other conspiracies (Goertzel, 1994; Swami et al., 2011).”
ResultConspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x · Cited by 1,050 · cited 1×
“Indeed , while some conspiracy theories are merely false, others are based on beliefs that are not only false but also harmful (Maibach, 2012; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 · Cited by 693
Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion
Oliver, J., & Wood, T. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12084 · Cited by 689
The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489 · Cited by 661
Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611434786 · Cited by 660
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612457686 · Cited by 638
Abalakina‐Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00160 · Cited by 589
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?
Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e527772014-223 · Cited by 534
The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1720 · Cited by 527
Oxford handbook of climate change and society
Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5078 · Cited by 517
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x · Cited by 502
The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society
Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.001.0001 · Cited by 492
Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1295 · Cited by 441
Organized Climate Change Denial
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0010 · Cited by 433
Empire of conspiracy: the culture of paranoia in postwar America
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1864 · Cited by 406
Belief in conspiracy theories. the role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy
Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027 · Cited by 400 · cited 1×
“…theories is sometimes associated with a latent psychopathology such as paranoid schizophrenia (Barron, Morgan, Towell, Altemeyer, & Swami, 2014; Darwin, Neave, & Holmes, 2011), social-personality psychologists have developed an increased interest in explaining conspiracy ideation in the…”
BackgroundClimate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks
Dunlap, R. E., & Jacques, P. J. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213477096 · Cited by 334
Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing
Clarke, S. (2002) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004931032002001 · Cited by 303
Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview
Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K. G., Parker, A., Denovan, A., & Parton, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206 · Cited by 227
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Wood, M. J. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315746838 · Cited by 221
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1995) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00297.x · Cited by 212
Melley, T. (2016) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501713019 · Cited by 200
Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation
Barron, D. S., Morgan, K., Towell, T., Altemeyer, B., & Swami, V. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040 · Cited by 124
Correction: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134773 · Cited by 111
Knowing Our Options for Setting the Record Straight, When Doing So Is Particularly Important
Maibach, E. W. (2012) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/1529100612457647 · Cited by 15
van der Linden, S. (2013) · Scientific American Mind · doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0913-40 · Cited by 12
What a Hoax: Why people believe in conspiracy theories
van der Linden, S. (2013) · Scientific American Mind · Cited by 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9 · Cited by 708
“van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Rosenthal S, Maibach E (2017b) Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change.”
BackgroundInoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19
van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790 · Cited by 632
“…unwanted persuasion (e.g., climate change or vaccination) to the manipulation techniques that underpin most fake news such as using emotional language (Brady et al., 2017), conspiratorial reasoning (Lewandowsky et al., 2013; van der Linden, 2015) or impersonating experts online (Goga et al., 2015).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Linden, S.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 171-173
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1199131209
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 82.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, global warming, climate change skepticism, prosocial behavior, environmental decision-making, charitable giving, petition signing, climate change denial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
