Cited by 393Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: A Five-Factor Measure of Narcissistic Personality Traits

Glover, Natalie, Miller, Joshua D., Lynam, Donald R., Crego, Cristina, Widiger, Thomas A.·2012·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

This study provides convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity data for a new measure of narcissistic personality traits created from the perspective of the Five-factor model (FFM) of general personality structure. Fifteen scales were constructed as maladaptive variants of respective facets of the FFM (e.g., Reactive Anger as a narcissistic variant of angry hostility), with item selection made on the basis of a criterion-keying approach using results from 167 undergraduates. On the basis of data from 166 additional undergraduates, the convergent validity of these 15 scales was tested with respect to 8 established measures of narcissism (including measures of both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism) and the respective facets of the FFM. Discriminant validity was tested with respect to facets from other FFM domains. Incremental validity was tested with respect to the ability of the FFM narcissism trait scales to account for variance in 2 alternative measures of narcissism, after variance accounted for by respective NEO PI-R facet scales and other established measures of narcissism were first removed. The findings support the validity of these new scales as measures of narcissistic personality traits and as maladaptive variants of the FFM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891.2012.670680

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glover, N., Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2012-09
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
500-512
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W1969475475
Cited by
393
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
narcissism, Big Five personality traits, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, personality traits, maladaptive personality traits, convergent validity, discriminant validity, incremental validity, personality assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Narcissism, Personality, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Self Report, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review