Cited by 68Pain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Is it better to have controlled and lost than never to have controlled at all? An experimental investigation of control over pain

Crombez, Geert, Eccleston, Christopher, De Vlieger, Petra, Van Damme, Stefaan, De Clercq, Armand·2008·Pain

Abstract

Trying to control pain is a common human goal. But little is know about what happens when one loses control over pain. This paper reports an experiment with 74 healthy volunteers, half of whom were given control over a pain stimulus and subsequently lost control, and half of whom never had control over the pain. This study investigates whether having had control and lost it would result in a more unpleasant pain experience, more fear about impending pain, a heightened vigilance to pain, and greater interference on a secondary task. Participants in the experimental group first learned to avoid a painful stimulus by correctly responding to a card sorting task, but later on lost control over the painful stimulus. In the yoked comparison group, participants had no control over the painful stimulus from the beginning. Results indicated that losing control over pain and, relatedly, attempting to control uncontrollable pain have significant costs such as a higher fear of the impending pain stimulus and retarded performance on a secondary task. When attempts to avoid pain are blocked, individuals persist in their avoidance attempts, try harder, and narrow their focus of attention upon the problem to be solved. These findings are discussed within the context of a dual process model of coping with uncontrollable adverse events [Brandtstädter J, Renner G. Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychol Aging 1990;5:58-67] and possible mechanisms for perseverance with ineffective solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.028

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concept of a 'preferred future' when living with pain has more recently been given focus by pain researchers, as have techniques such as focusing on successes during pain consultations.

    “The concept of a ‘preferred future’ when living with pain has also more recently been given focus by pain researchers,18–20 as have techniques such as focusing on successes during pain consultations.21”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., De Vlieger, P., Van Damme, S., & De Clercq, A.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Crombez, Geert
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-07-31
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
631-639
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031850634
Cited by
68
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pain management, loss of control, pain unpleasantness, fear of pain, sustained attention, secondary task interference, pain avoidance, goal pursuit, perseverance, attentional narrowing
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Radionuclide Imaging, Stress, Psychological, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review