Cited by 717Free Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control

Open access
Leotti, Lauren A., Iyengar, Sheena S., Ochsner, Kevin N.·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Belief in one's ability to exert control over the environment and to produce desired results is essential for an individual's wellbeing. It has repeatedly been argued that perception of control is not only desirable, but is also probably a psychological and biological necessity. In this article, we review the literature supporting this claim and present evidence of a biological basis for the need for control and for choice-that is, the means by which we exercise control over the environment. Converging evidence from animal research, clinical studies and neuroimaging suggests that the need for control is a biological imperative for survival, and a corticostriatal network is implicated as the neural substrate of this adaptive behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given people's psychological and presumably biological need for autonomy, controlling environments tend to induce stress and self-regulatory attempts at controlling emotional responses.

    “Given people's psychological and presumably biological need for autonomy (Deci & Ryan, 2000, 2008;Leotti et al., 2010), controlling environments tend to induce stress (Reeve & Tseng, 2011) and, presumably as a result, self-regulatory attempts at controlling emotional responses.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Leotti, Lauren A.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
457-463
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076616854
Cited by
717
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076137, MH076137)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022541, DA-022541, F32DA027308)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD069178)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
need for control, perceived control, corticostriatal network, neural correlates, survival, well-being, animal studies, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Choice Behavior, Corpus Striatum, Humans, Nerve Net, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review