Cited by 79Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Chronic pain acceptance and affective well-being: a coping perspective

Kranz, Dirk, Bollinger, Annicka, Nilges, Paul·2010·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between chronic pain acceptance and affective well-being from a coping perspective. One hundred-fifty patients from a multidisciplinary pain centre provided self-report data including measures of pain acceptance, positive and negative affect, and accommodative flexibility. The bivariate and multiple correlation patterns were consistent with the assumption that pain willingness (the attitudinal component of pain acceptance including the recognition of the uncontrollability of pain) primarily reduces negative affect, whereas activity engagement (the behavioural component of pain acceptance including the pursuit of life activities despite pain) additionally produces positive affect. The data furthermore suggested activity engagement as a mediating link between pain willingness and positive affect. Moderation analyses showed that accommodative flexibility (the general readiness to adjust personal goals to situational constraints) facilitates both pain willingness and activity engagement--especially when average pain intensity is high. In sum, the results support the view that chronic pain patients' well-being is closely tied to the maintenance of life activities which presupposes an accepting attitude towards pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.03.010

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kranz, D., Bollinger, A., & Nilges, P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • German Red Cross (DE)
Corresponding author
Kranz, Dirk
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
1021-1025
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2067168582
Cited by
79
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, pain acceptance, emotional well-being, coping, activity engagement, accommodative flexibility, positive affect, negative affect, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain, Pain Measurement, Personal Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review