Cited by 39Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo EffectNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

From cue to meaning: Brain mechanisms supporting the construction of expectations of pain

Open access
Lobanov, Oleg V., Zeidan, Fadel, McHaffie, John G., Kraft, Robert A., Coghill, Robert C.·2014·Pain

Abstract

The brain mechanisms by which sensory cues become transformed into expectations of impending events are a critical component of cognitive tuning of sensory processing. However, distinctions among the afferent processing of cue-related activity itself versus those mechanisms supporting the contextual meaning imparted to the cue remain limited. Do sensory cues with equal meaning engage similar patterns of brain activations even if they are delivered in separate modalities? To address this question, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging of an expectation paradigm in which cues were delivered with visual or innocuous thermal stimuli. Cues were designed to be highly meaningful because they predicted the delivery of high and low painful stimuli. As expected, the cues themselves activated unimodal sensory cortices. This cue modality-specific activation was transformed into a pattern of activity reflecting cue meaning. Cues signaling high pain produced greater activity in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. Such activity is consistent with the graded encoding of the magnitude of expected pain. In contrast, cues signaling low pain produced greater activity in the right intraparietal sulcus. This activation may reflect processes directing spatial attention to the stimulated body region in order to more accurately evaluate the relatively weak, low pain stimulus. Taken together, these findings indicate that cues arising from different sensory modalities ultimately engage common brain mechanisms that reflect the meaning of the cue. This meaning-related activity is presumably critical for preparing sensory systems to optimally process afferent information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.014

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher-order regions such as ACC, dACC, and PFC support the contextual meaning of pain.

    “The contextual meaning of pain is then facilitated through activation of higher-order brain regions, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsal ACC (dACC), and prefrontal cortex (PFC).80–82”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lobanov, O. V., Zeidan, F., McHaffie, J. G., Kraft, R. A., & Coghill, R. C.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Coghill, Robert C.
Venue
Pain
Published
2014-01
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
129-136
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163237764
Cited by
38
References
42
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS 39426, R01NS039426)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
pain anticipation, sensory cues, multisensory integration, visual cues, thermal pain, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, intraparietal sulcus, spatial attention, sensory prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cues, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Visual Analog Scale, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review