Cited by 106Hallucinations in medical conditionsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Structural and functional neuroimaging in patients with Parkinson's disease and visual hallucinations: A critical review

Lenka, Abhishek, Jhunjhunwala, Ketan Ramakant, Saini, Jitender, Pal, Pramod Kumar·2015·Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Abstract

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may develop various non-motor symptoms (NMS) during the course of the illness and psychosis is one of the common NMS of PD. Visual hallucinations (VH) are the most common manifestation of psychosis in PD. The exact pathogenesis of VH in patients with PD is not clearly understood. Presence of VH has been described to be associated with rapid cognitive decline and increased nursing home placements in PD patients. A large number of structural and functional neuroimaging studies have been conducted to understand the cerebral basis of VH in PD. Structural imaging studies (Voxel Based Morphometry) have reported grey matter atrophy in multiple regions of the brain such as primary visual cortex, visual association cortex, limbic regions, cholinergic structures such as pedunculopontine nucleus and substantia innominata, which conclude possible alterations of brain regions associated with functions such as visuospatial-perception, attention control and memory. Most functional neuroimaging studies (functional MRI, positron emission tomography and single photon emission computerized tomography) have reported altered activation, blood flow, or reduced metabolism in both dorsal and ventral visual pathways, which probably indicates an alteration in the normal bottom-top visual processing and the presence of an aberrant top-down visual processing. This review critically analyzes the published studies on the structural and functional neuroimaging in PD patients with VH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.04.005

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenka, A., Jhunjhunwala, K. R., Saini, J., & Pal, P. K.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
Venue
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
683-691
ISSN
1353-8020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055870666
Cited by
106
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, visual hallucinations
MeSH terms
Hallucinations, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Positron-Emission Tomography, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review