Cited by 40Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Sex differences in conditioned nicotine reward are age-specific

Open access
Lenoir, Magalie, Starosciak, Amy K., Ledon, Jennifer, Booth, Caitlin, Zakharova, Elena, Wade, Dean, Vignoli, Beatrice, Izenwasser, Sari·2015·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Women constitute half of all smokers and many studies suggest that adult males and females differ in factors that maintain tobacco smoking, yet there is limited information about sex differences in nicotine reward during adolescence. Limited studies suggest that adolescent male rats self-administer more nicotine than adults, suggesting that drug administration during adolescence leads to different behavioral effects than during adulthood. In the present study, male rats developed a significant conditioned place preference (CPP) to lower doses of nicotine than females, regardless of age. In addition, adolescents were more sensitive than adults. In female rats, adolescents exhibited a CPP of greater magnitude than adult females. In males, the magnitude of the CPP did not differ as a function of age, but adolescents exhibited CPP to lower doses than adults. There also were differences in nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptor binding in nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen in response to nicotine across age and sex. These findings suggest that it is necessary to consider sex- and age-specific effects of drugs such as nicotine when developing strategies for improving smoking cessation treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.02.019

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents of both sexes show stronger conditioned place preference (CPP) than adults following nicotine injections.

    “adolescents of both sexes show stronger conditioned place preference (CPP) than adults following nicotine injections [190]”

    From Consequences of adolescent drug use (2023) · cites this paper as [190]

    The Results (§3.1) report higher nicotine CPP in adolescent than adult female rats at 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg. Adolescent males showed CPP at a lower dose than adult males (0.05 mg/kg), but both ages showed CPP at 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg. The paper therefore supports an age difference in both sexes, not an unqualified claim that adolescents of both sexes show stronger CPP. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sex differences in nicotine sensitivity at different phases of adolescence have been reported in preclinical studies.

    “Sex differences in nicotine sensitivity at different phases of adolescence have also been reported in preclinical studies (Cao et al. 2010; Kawai et al. 2011; Lenoir et al. 2015), and are consistent with clinical observations of differing developmental trajectories of tobacco use in males and females (Chen & Jacobsen, 2012).”

    From <scp>N</scp> icotine and the adolescent brain (2015) · cites this paper as Lenoir et al. 2015

    The Results (§3.1) report sex differences in nicotine conditioned place preference in periadolescent rats: males responded to lower doses than females. But the Methods (§2.1) identify only one adolescent age group, starting at postnatal day 34, alongside an adult group. This paper therefore supports sex differences during periadolescence, not a comparison across different phases of adolescence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adolescent rodents are more sensitive than adults to the acute rewarding effects of nicotine, as shown by conditioned place preference, with some studies demonstrating reward after a single pairing of drug and context.

    “Adolescent rodents are more sensitive than adults to the acute rewarding effects of nicotine, as shown by conditioned place preference [133–138], with some studies demonstrating reward after a single pairing of drug and context [139,140].”

    From Nicotine on the developing brain. (2023) · cites this paper as [138]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenoir, M., Starosciak, A. K., Ledon, J., Booth, C., Zakharova, E., Wade, D., Vignoli, B., & Izenwasser, S.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Izenwasser, Sari
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
132
Pages
56-62
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983987663
Cited by
40
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • NIH Office of Research on Women's Health (DA 024584-0002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
sex differences, nicotine reward, conditioned place preference, nucleus accumbens, caudate-putamen, smoking cessation, tobacco dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review