Cited by 884Behavioral Health and InterventionsCommunity Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation Science

Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change

Valente, Thomas W., Pumpuang, Patchareeya·2007·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

This article reviews 10 techniques used to identify opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Opinion leaders can act as gatekeepers for interventions, help change social norms, and accelerate behavior change. Few studies document the manner in which opinion leaders are identified, recruited, and trained to promote health. The authors categorize close to 200 studies that have studied or used opinion leaders to promote behavior change into 10 different methods. They present the advantages and disadvantages of the 10 opinion leader identification methods and provide sample instruments for each. Factors that might influence programs to select one or another method are then discussed, and the article closes with a discussion of combining and comparing methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198106297855

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many programs use haphazard, invalid, or convenience methods to identify who delivers the program.

    “Many programs use haphazard, invalid, or convenience methods to identify who delivers the program [19].”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [19]

  • Network-identified peer opinion leaders have been used in dozens of studies to accelerate behavior change.

    “Network-identified peer opinion leaders have been used in dozens of studies to accelerate behavior change.”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valente, T. W., & Pumpuang, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Southern California, Alhambra
Corresponding author
Valente, Thomas W.
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2007-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
881-896
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W2107709347
Cited by
884
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 23
FWCI
27.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA016094, DA 16094)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
opinion leaders, opinion leader identification, behavior change, health promotion, social norms, gatekeepers, health communication
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Leadership, Peer Group, Psychology, Social, Public Opinion, Residence Characteristics, Social Support, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review