The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · Cited by 20,772
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Mayring, P. (2008) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089 · Cited by 4,805
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225 · cited 1×
“It ranges from 0 (complete disagreement) and 1 (complete agreement) and its use is recommended when data regard complex categories derived from content analysis [14,15].”
BackgroundQualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x · Cited by 3,437
Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x · Cited by 3,068
Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109 · Cited by 2,715
(1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,472
Validity in qualitative research
Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973201129119299 · Cited by 2,144
Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality
Zhou, Z., Chen, Y., Ding, M., Wright, P., Lu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20661 · Cited by 978
Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience
Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9 · Cited by 935
Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5 · Cited by 907
Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations
Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.818 · Cited by 829
On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment
Schilling, J. (2006) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28 · Cited by 512
Evaluation of qualitative research
Horsburgh, D. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x · Cited by 459
McKinstry, B. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7265.867 · Cited by 344
olde Hartman, T. C., Hassink-Franke, L. J., Lucassen, P. L., van Spaendonck, K. P., & van Weel, C. (2009) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-10-68 · Cited by 127
Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities
Pfeil, U., & Zaphiris, P. (2009) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-009-0154-3 · Cited by 103
How patients perceive a doctor's caring attitude
Quirk, M. E., Mazor, K. M., Haley, H.-L. A., Philbin, M., Fischer, M. A., Sullivan, K., & Hatem, D. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.022 · Cited by 97
Assessment of Interjudge Reliability in the Open-Ended Questions Coding Process
Muñoz‐Leiva, F., Montoro-Ríos, F. J., & Martínez, T. L. (2006) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-005-1093-6 · Cited by 86
Salmon, P., Mendick, N., & Young, B. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.017 · Cited by 83
Development of a questionnaire to assess communication preferences of patients with chronic illness
Farin‐Glattacker, E., Gramm, L., & Kosiol, D. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.011 · Cited by 59
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4471-9_6 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014522633 · Cited by 4,395
Byron, G., Ziedonis, D. M., McGrath, C., Frazier, J. A., deTorrijos, F., & Fulwiler, C. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0330-2 · Cited by 70
Aelbrecht, K., Rimondini, M., Bensing, J., Moretti, F., Willems, S., Mazzi, M., Fletcher, I., & Deveugele, M. (2015) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9569-6 · Cited by 45
Self-citationLEYERZAPF, H., VISSE, M., DE BEER, A., & ABMA, T. A. (2018) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x16001045 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Moretti, F., van Vliet, L., Bensing, J., Deledda, G., Mazzi, M., Rimondini, M., Zimmermann, C., & Fletcher, I.
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-428
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101384705
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 51.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
