Cited by 293Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Evidence-based pharmacological treatment options for ADHD in children and adolescents

Open access
Mechler, Konstantin, Banaschewski, Tobias, Hohmann, Sarah, Häge, Alexander·2022·Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, causing functional impairment. Its prevalence lies at approximately 5% in children and adolescents and at approximately 2.5% in adults. The disorder follows a multifactorial etiology and shows a high heritability. Patients show a high interindividual and intraindividual variability of symptoms, with executive deficits in several cognitive domains. Overall, ADHD is associated with high rates of psychiatric comorbidities, and insufficient treatment is linked to adverse long-term outcomes. Current clinical guidelines recommend an individualized multimodal treatment approach including psychoeducation, pharmacological interventions, and non-pharmacological interventions. Available medications include stimulants (methylphenidate, amphetamines) and non-stimulants (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine). While available pharmacological treatment options for ADHD show relatively large effect sizes (in short-term trials) and overall good tolerability, there is still a need for improvement of current pharmacotherapeutic strategies and for the development of novel medications. This review summarizes available pharmacological treatment options for ADHD in children and adolescents, identifies current issues in research and evidence gaps, and provides an overview of ongoing efforts to develop new medications for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents by means of a systematic cross-sectional analysis of the clinical trials registry www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107940

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mechler, K., Banaschewski, T., Hohmann, S., & Häge, A.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Mechler, Konstantin
Venue
Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
230
Pages
107940
ISSN
0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177052253
Cited by
293
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 13
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD medication, children and adolescents, stimulant medication, methylphenidate, amphetamine, non-stimulant medication, atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, psychiatric comorbidity, executive dysfunction, clinical trial registries
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Methylphenidate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review