Cited by 186Primate Behavior and EcologyComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Elephant brain

Shoshani, Jeheskel, Kupsky, William J., Marchant, Gary H.·2006·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

We report morphological data on brains of four African, Loxodonta africana, and three Asian elephants, Elephas maximus, and compare findings to literature. Brains exhibit a gyral pattern more complex and with more numerous gyri than in primates, humans included, and in carnivores, but less complex than in cetaceans. Cerebral frontal, parietal, temporal, limbic, and insular lobes are well developed, whereas the occipital lobe is relatively small. The insula is not as opercularized as in man. The temporal lobe is disproportionately large and expands laterally. Humans and elephants have three parallel temporal gyri: superior, middle, and inferior. Hippocampal sizes in elephants and humans are comparable, but proportionally smaller in elephant. A possible carotid rete was observed at the base of the brain. Brain size appears to be related to body size, ecology, sociality, and longevity. Elephant adult brain averages 4783 g, the largest among living and extinct terrestrial mammals; elephant neonate brain averages 50% of its adult brain weight (25% in humans). Cerebellar weight averages 18.6% of brain (1.8 times larger than in humans). During evolution, encephalization quotient has increased by 10-fold (0.2 for extinct Moeritherium, approximately 2.0 for extant elephants). We present 20 figures of the elephant brain, 16 of which contain new material. Similarities between human and elephant brains could be due to convergent evolution; both display mosaic characters and are highly derived mammals. Humans and elephants use and make tools and show a range of complex learning skills and behaviors. In elephants, the large amount of cerebral cortex, especially in the temporal lobe, and the well-developed olfactory system, structures associated with complex learning and behavioral functions in humans, may provide the substrate for such complex skills and behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.03.016

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoshani, J., Kupsky, W. J., & Marchant, G. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Asmara (ER)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shoshani, Jeheskel
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
124-157
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W104174880
Cited by
186
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, Asian elephant, temporal lobe, hippocampus, insula, cerebellum, brain size, encephalization quotient, convergent evolution, brain evolution, tool use, olfactory system, brain structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Brain, Cats, Pan troglodytes, Chinchilla, Elephants, Biological Evolution, Female, Guinea Pigs, Humans, Hyraxes, Male, Sheep, Equidae, Wolves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review