The DOI matches its Crossref record; 300 of the 300 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1988) · Did Darwin Get It Right? · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22 · Cited by 7,906
Equilibrium points in n -person games
Nash, J. F. (1950) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.36.1.48 · Cited by 7,560
Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation
Nowak, M. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133755 · Cited by 5,894
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502
Cited by
The evolution of trust and trustworthiness
Kumar, A., Capraro, V., & Perc, M. (2020) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0491 · Cited by 148
Evolution of cooperation in a hierarchical society with corruption control
Huang, F., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2018) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.018 · Cited by 28
On the number of equilibria of the replicator-mutator dynamics for noisy social dilemmas
Chen, L., Deng, C., Duong, M. H., & Han, T. A. (2024) · Chaos, Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114565 · Cited by 7
Ren, T., & Zeng, X.-J. (2024) · Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/22 · Cited by 8
“This payoff matrix forms four classical game structures [Wang et al. , 2015]: PD, chicken, harmony and stag hunt, each defined by specific payoff inequalities.”
BackgroundOn equilibrium properties of the replicator–mutator equation in deterministic and random games
Duong, M. H., & Han, T. A. (2020) · Dynamic Games and Applications · doi:10.1007/s13235-019-00338-8 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Kokubo, S., Jusup, M., & Tanimoto, J.
- Venue
- Physics of Life Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 1571-0645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W233187448
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 300
- FWCI
- 177.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.033
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Kokubo, S., Jusup, M., & Tanimoto, J. (2015). Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games. Physics of Life Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
