Cited by 77Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDigital Mental Health Interventions

Predicting which type of push notification content motivates users to engage in a self-monitoring app

Open access
Bidargaddi, N., Pituch, T., Maaieh, H., Short, C., Strecher, V.·2018·Preventive Medicine Reports

Abstract

Despite the unprecedented access to self-monitoring health apps, lack of optimal user engagement remains a significant challenge. Push notification prompts with contextually tailored messages offers a promising strategy to improve engagement. To increase the efficacy of push-notifications on engaging individuals with health apps, greater attention to the modifiable components of push notifications that influence responsiveness is needed. This study examines the effect of message content and frequency of push notifications, along with past app usage on responding to notifications within 24 h, and engaging with self-monitoring in JOOL Health smartphone app. Mixed models were applied on a de-identified data set of 18,000 contextually tailored push notifications sent by JOOL Health App to 1414 participants. The content in sent messages on behavioural topics were mapped into either tailored suggestions or tailored insights. Our findings suggest that push notifications with tailored suggestions were more effective overall in encouraging self-monitoring, but amongst frequent app users, push-notifications containing insights was associated with greater self-monitoring. People who were not using the app as frequently were less likely to respond to a prompt. This study suggests that push-notification content does have an impact on subsequent use of key app features, and app developers should consider what content is likely to work best for who, and under what circumstances. Secondary data-analysis of commercial apps presents a unique opportunity to elucidate and optimize health behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.07.004

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • External strategies such as automated reminders, therapist-led coaching, and moderated peer-support groups can be effective toward promoting engagement with digital interventions for mental health.

    “There is already some promising research being done in this space, with several studies finding that external strategies such as automated reminders (13, 67), therapist-led coaching (68, 69), and moderated peer-support groups (70) can be effective toward promoting engagement with digital interventions for mental health.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bidargaddi, N., Pituch, T., Maaieh, H., Short, C., & Strecher, V.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health (AU)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Bidargaddi, N.
Venue
Preventive Medicine Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
11
Pages
267-273
ISSN
2211-3355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887089341
Cited by
77
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
push notifications, self-monitoring, health apps, user engagement, message content, app usage frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review