Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of GABA: A methodological review

Open access
Puts, Nicolaas A.J., Edden, Richard A.E.·2012·Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a powerful methodology that allows the direct detection of endogenous metabolites in the human body non-invasively in vivo. Although historically most often applied within a clinical context, there is increasing uptake (as there is with structural and functional MR imaging) of MRS to study the healthy brain. Although the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in the human brain GABA, or γ-aminobutyric acid (H3N+CH2CH2CH2COO−), is only present in the human brain at millimolar levels, it is possible to measure GABA concentration with MRS, usually by tailoring the MRS experiment specifically to isolate GABA signals from the spectrum. This review will summarize the MRS methods proposed for detecting GABA, and address their various applications to date. Although the majority of cortical neurons are glutamatergic, approximately one sixth of cortical neurons are GABAergic inter-neurons [1]. There is wide interest within the clinical and basic neuroscience community in studying the role of inhibitory processes in normal brain function and the pathophysiology of disease. Both GABA receptors and transporters have been well characterized, and associated genes have been implicated by genetic studies of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Two main sub-types of GABA receptor, GABAA and GABAB, mediate the synaptic effects of GABA, and synaptic GABA is rapidly removed by high-affinity GABA transporters (GAT). GABA is produced from glutamate by glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) within GABAergic neurons and is metabolised to succinic acid semialdehyde by GABA transaminase (GABA-T) and thence to succinate, primarily within astrocytic mitochondria [2]. Among a wide variety of methods for studying GABA and GABAergic processes, the only technique that allows the direct, non-invasive detection of endogenous GABA in vivo in the brain is magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). The purpose of this review is to introduce MRS methods that detect GABA in vivo, and to summarize the existing published literature applying these methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.06.001

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Puts, N. A. J., & Edden, R. A. E.
Venue
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
60
Pages
29-41
ISSN
0079-6565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002081170
Cited by
393
References
88
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of GABA: A methodological review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.06.001
The paper
Puts, N. A. J., & Edden, R. A. E. (2012). In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of GABA: A methodological review. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.06.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.