Cited by 34Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Neural correlates of clinical improvement in response to N-acetylcysteine in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury

Open access
Cullen, Kathryn R., Schreiner, Melinda Westlund, Klimes-Dougan, Bonnie, Eberly, Lynn E., LaRiviere, Lori L., Lim, Kelvin O., Camchong, Jazmin, Mueller, Bryon A.·2020·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a serious clinical problem that is common in adolescents. Novel, biologically-informed approaches for treating NSSI in adolescents are needed to prevent negative outcomes such as chronic NSSI and future suicide attempts. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been used successfully to address other conditions that involve repetitive maladaptive behaviors and may have utility in addressing NSSI. This study explored neural circuit changes following an open-label, 8-week trial of NAC in female adolescents with NSSI. We measured whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of the amygdala and the nucleus accumbens before and after treatment using resting-state functional neuroimaging. Usable neuroimaging data from both pre- and post-treatment were available for 18 participants. Reduction in NSSI frequency was associated with a decrease in left amygdala RSFC with right supplementary motor area (SMA), but with an increase in right amygdala RSFC with right inferior frontal cortex. For nucleus accumbens, a reduction in NSSI frequency was associated with a decrease in connectivity between right nucleus accumbens and left superior medial frontal cortex. We also report change in similar circuits accompanying clinical improvement in depression and global psychopathology measures. These preliminary findings suggest amygdala and nucleus accumbens-based circuits as potential treatment targets, and set the stage for future research designed to confirm these neural targets using randomized, placebo-controlled designs to confirm clinical efficacy and mechanisms of effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109778

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In NSSI youth undergoing an 8-week open-label N-acetylcysteine trial, reductions in NSSI frequency after treatment associate with decreases in left amygdala-right SMA and right nucleus accumbens-left superior medial frontal cortex RSFC, and increases in right amygdala-right inferior frontal cortex RSFC.

    “Reductions in NSSI frequency after treatment associate with decreases in left amygdala-right SMA and right nucleus accumbens-left superior medial frontal cortex RSFC, and increases in right amygdala-right inferior frontal cortex RSFC (108).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First Michael B Gibbon Miriam Spitzer Robert L and Williams JBW (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition With Psychotic Screen CID-I/P W/ PSY SCREEN). New York: New York: Biometrics Research Institute.
  2. Hollingshead AB, & Others. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/30754699/yjs_fall_2011.pdf#page=21
  3. Menon V (2015). Salience Network. In Brain Mapping (pp. 597– 611).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cullen, K. R., Schreiner, M. W., Klimes-Dougan, B., Eberly, L. E., LaRiviere, L. L., Lim, K. O., Camchong, J., & Mueller, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Cullen, Kathryn R.
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
99
Pages
109778
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2986135401
Cited by
34
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, N-acetylcysteine, adolescents, resting-state functional connectivity, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, supplementary motor area, inferior frontal cortex, depression, treatment response
MeSH terms
Acetylcysteine, Adolescent, Amygdala, Female, Humans, Nucleus Accumbens, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review