Cited by 719COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 38 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Younger people are more vulnerable to stress, anxiety and depression during COVID-19 pandemic: A global cross-sectional survey

Open access
Varma, Prerna, Junge, Moira, Meaklim, Hailey, Jackson, Melinda L.·2021·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-ranging consequences for general physical and mental health. Country-specific research reveals a general reduction in mental and physical well-being, due to measures undertaken to stop the spread of COVID-19 disease. However, research is yet to examine the impact of the pandemic on global psychological distress and its effects upon vulnerable groups. Exploration of the factors that potentially mediate the relationship between stress and mental health during this period is needed, to assist in undertaking concrete measures to mitigate psychological distress and support vulnerable groups. Therefore, this study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological distress globally, and identified factors that may exacerbate decline in mental health. N = 1653 participants (mean age 42.90 ± 13.63 years; 30.3% males) from 63 countries responded to the survey. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire and State Trait Anxiety Inventory, respectively. Other measures included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale and the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Globally, consistently high levels of stress, anxiety, depression and poor sleep were observed regardless of number of COVID-19 cases. Over 70% of the respondents had greater than moderate levels of stress, with 59% meeting the criteria for clinically significant anxiety and 39% reporting moderate depressive symptoms. People with a prior mental health diagnosis experienced greater psychological distress. Poor sleep, lower levels of resilience, younger age and loneliness significantly mediated the links between stress and depression, and stress and anxiety. Age-based differences revealed that younger age-groups were more vulnerable to stress, depression and anxiety symptoms. Results show that these vulnerable individuals need more support. Age-specific interventions for modifiable factors that mediate the psychological distress need to urgently deployed to address the global mental health pandemic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110236

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

50 Own result · 24 Not checked yet · 5 Own method · 2 No basis given

Verify all 38 references — free account

Show all 53 claims

  • Not yet classified. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 12
28 of 28
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants' self-reported responses accurately reflect their true mental health and sleep status.

    “A global online survey was disseminated between April 9 and May 25, 2020 through social media channels, targeting adults over 18 years of age.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The number of COVID-19 cases in a country as of May 25, 2020 accurately reflects the pandemic burden experienced by respondents in that country.

    “Participants were divided into three groups based on number of COVID-19 cases in their country (based on the data available on May 25th 2020).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(1493) = 39.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (1493) = 39.86, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1493) = 43.16reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (1493) = 43.16, p < .001”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–716 of 716

Metadata

Authors
Varma, P., Junge, M., Meaklim, H., & Jackson, M. L.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Melinda L.
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
109
Pages
110236
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116683217
Cited by
719
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 191 · 2021: 93
FWCI
46.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, young adults, age differences, sleep quality, loneliness, resilience, vulnerable populations, mediation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Loneliness, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review