Cited by 259Sleep and related disordersMental Health Research TopicsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Reciprocal relationships between daily sleep and mood: a systematic review of naturalistic prospective studies

Konjarski, Monika, Murray, Greg, Lee, V Vien, Jackson, Melinda L.·2018·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

An intimate relationship exists between sleep and affective states. Disturbances in sleep are common across a spectrum of psychopathologies, and are recognised as precipitating or prodromal factors for mood disorders. Conversely, affective states can impact sleep quality and ability to fall asleep. However, one of the main limitations of this literature is that studies have typically assessed sleep and mood at one time point and studies are often laboratory-based, where measurement of both sleep and mood has dubious ecological validity. The aim of the current review was to systematically examine the evidence for associations between day-to-day fluctuations in sleep and mood in naturalistic studies using ambulatory diary techniques. Electronic databases (EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and SCOPUS) were searched for studies using experience sampling methodology to investigate daily associations between sleep and mood in naturalistic environments in healthy and clinical samples. Findings of the included studies supported the notion of a reciprocal relationship between subjective sleep variables (sleep quality, sleep duration and sleep latency) and daytime affective states over the short term, and highlight the potential clinical importance of daily sleep disturbance in the prediction and prevention of the development of psychopathology in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.05.005

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konjarski, M., Murray, G., Lee, V. V., & Jackson, M. L.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Melinda L.
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
42
Pages
47-58
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807197753
Cited by
259
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep, mood, bidirectional relationship, sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep latency, mood disorders, sleep disorders, psychopathology prediction, ecological momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review