Cited by 2,621COVID-19 and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and AccessMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population

Open access
Pierce, Matthias, Hope, Holly, Ford, Tamsin, Hatch, Stephani, Hotopf, Matthew, John, Ann, Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Webb, Roger +3 more·2020·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population mental health is of increasing global concern. We examine changes in adult mental health in the UK population before and during the lockdown. Methods In this secondary analysis of a national, longitudinal cohort study, households that took part in Waves 8 or 9 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) panel, including all members aged 16 or older in April, 2020, were invited to complete the COVID-19 web survey on April 23–30, 2020. Participants who were unable to make an informed decision as a result of incapacity, or who had unknown postal addresses or addresses abroad were excluded. Mental health was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Repeated cross-sectional analyses were done to examine temporal trends. Fixed-effects regression models were fitted to identify within-person change compared with preceding trends. Findings Waves 6–9 of the UKHLS had 53 351 participants. Eligible participants for the COVID-19 web survey were from households that took part in Waves 8 or 9, and 17 452 (41·2%) of 42 330 eligible people participated in the web survey. Population prevalence of clinically significant levels of mental distress rose from 18·9% (95% CI 17·8–20·0) in 2018–19 to 27·3% (26·3–28·2) in April, 2020, one month into UK lockdown. Mean GHQ-12 score also increased over this time, from 11·5 (95% CI 11·3–11·6) in 2018–19, to 12·6 (12·5–12·8) in April, 2020. This was 0·48 (95% CI 0·07–0·90) points higher than expected when accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018. Comparing GHQ-12 scores within individuals, adjusting for time trends and significant predictors of change, increases were greatest in 18–24-year-olds (2·69 points, 95% CI 1·89–3·48), 25–34-year-olds (1·57, 0·96–2·18), women (0·92, 0·50–1·35), and people living with young children (1·45, 0·79–2·12). People employed before the pandemic also averaged a notable increase in GHQ-12 score (0·63, 95% CI 0·20–1·06). Interpretation By late April, 2020, mental health in the UK had deteriorated compared with pre-COVID-19 trends. Policies emphasising the needs of women, young people, and those with preschool aged children are likely to play an important part in preventing future mental illness. Funding None.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30308-4

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Within-person GHQ-12 increases were greatest in 25-34-year-olds, with an increase of 1.57 points.

    “25–34-year-olds (1·57, 0·96–2·18)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
  • Findingown data

    The April 2020 mean GHQ-12 score was 0.48 points higher than expected after accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018.

    “This was 0·48 (95% CI 0·07–0·90) points higher than expected when accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the pandemic, the pre-2018 upward trend in mental distress would have continued into 2020.
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
    • Rests on an assumption: The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.
  • Findingown data

    People employed before the pandemic averaged an increase in GHQ-12 score of 0.63 points.

    “People employed before the pandemic also averaged a notable increase in GHQ-12 score (0·63, 95% CI 0·20–1·06).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
  • Findingnone given

    Prevalence of mental distress was higher in people with pre-existing health conditions.

    “Established health inequalities persist, with prevalence of mental distress higher in people with pre-existing health conditions, those living in low-income homes, and people of Asian ethnicity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
    • Rests on an assumption: The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.
  • Findingown data

    Within-person GHQ-12 increases were greatest in women, with an increase of 0.92 points.

    “women (0·92, 0·50–1·35)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims. 39
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Waves 6-9 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study included 53,351 participants.

    “Waves 6–9 of the UKHLS had 53 351 participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Within-person GHQ-12 increases were greatest in people living with young children, with an increase of 1.45 points.

    “people living with young children (1·45, 0·79–2·12)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Among 42,330 eligible people from households in Waves 8 or 9, 17,452 (41.2%) took part in the COVID-19 web survey.

    “Eligible participants for the COVID-19 web survey were from households that took part in Waves 8 or 9, and 17 452 (41·2%) of 42 330 eligible people participated in the web survey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    New inequalities in mental distress emerged, with people employed at the start of the pandemic at risk of larger increases.

    “have emerged, with those living with young children and those in employment at the start of the pandemic being at risk of larger increases in mental distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
    • Rests on an assumption: The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    New inequalities in mental distress emerged, with people living with young children at risk of larger increases.

    “have emerged, with those living with young children and those in employment at the start of the pandemic being at risk of larger increases in mental distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
    • Rests on an assumption: The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inequalities widened, with pronounced increases in women but not men.

    “and in women (but not men)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
    • Rests on an assumption: The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inequalities widened, with pronounced increases in younger but not older age groups.

    “Other sources of inequalities have widened, with pronounced increases in younger (but not older) age groups”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.
    • Rests on an assumption: The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.
    • Rests on an assumption: The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was some evidence in mean scores of widening inequalities for both ethnic minorities and those in the lowest income quintiles, but within-person adjusted analyses did not find significant effects for these characteristics.

    “We found some evidence in mean scores of widening inequalities for both ethnic minorities and those in lowest income quintiles. However, within-person adjusted analyses did not find significant effects for these characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although rates of mental distress were higher in people who were unemployed or economically inactive before lockdown, the increase in mental distress relative to previous trends was greater among those employed before the pandemic.

    “Although rates of mental distress were higher in people who, before lockdown, were unemployed or in other economically inactive roles such as being a full-time student, the increase in mental distress relative to previous trends was greater among those who were employed before the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean GHQ-12 scores were higher in London and among urban populations than in rural populations in late April 2020.

    “Mean scores were higher in London (13·3, 95% CI 12·8–13·8) and among urban populations (12·8, 12·6–13·0) than in rural populations (12·2, 11·9–12·4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Key workers had a similar mean GHQ-12 score to the rest of the population but were more likely to exceed the clinically significant threshold.

    “Key workers had a similar mean score to the rest of the population, but were more likely to exceed the clinically significant threshold score.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Mental distress was more common among people living in low-income households.

    “However, consistent with established patterns, mental distress was more common among people living in low-income households.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After adjustment, there was clear evidence for heterogeneous effects by age and gender (both p<0.0001).

    “There was clear evidence, after adjustment, for heterogeneous effects by age and gender (both effect modifiers, p<0·0001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Mean GHQ-12 scores were higher for women than for men in late April 2020.

    “Mean GHQ-12 scores were higher for women (13·6, 95% CI 13·4–13·8) than for men (11·5, 11·3–11·7)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Asian people had higher mean GHQ-12 scores than White British people in late April 2020, while variation by other ethnic groups was not significant.

    “Asian people had a higher mean score (13·7, 95% CI 13·0–14·5) than did White British people (12·5, 12·4–12·7); variation by other ethnic groups was not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean GHQ-12 score in April 2020 was higher than in 2018-19, 2017-18, and earlier waves.

    “Between April 23 and April 30, 2020, the mean score for the overall population was 12·6 (95% CI 12·5–12·8); higher than the mean scores in 2018–19 (11·5, 11·3–11·6), 2017–18 (11·4, 11·3–11·4), and for earlier waves”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    People not cohabiting with a partner, those cohabiting with young children, and those who received a shielding letter had high GHQ-12 scores in late April 2020.

    “People not cohabiting with a partner (13·8, 95% CI 13·6–14·1) and those cohabiting with young children in the household (13·7, 13·2–14·3) also had high scores; as did those who received a shielding letter from the government because of a pre-existing health condition (13·7, 13·1–14·3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a steady upward trend in clinically significant distress from 16.7% in 2014-15 to 18.9% in 2018-19, followed by a marked step-change increase in 2020.

    “Although a steady upward trend had already been evident over recent years (from 16·7%, 95% CI 16·1–17·3 in 2014–15 to 18·9%, 17·8–20·0 in 2018–19), a marked step-change increase occurred in 2020 (appendix p 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A GHQ-12 score of four or more indicates a clinically significant level of mental distress.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was some variation in score increase by household income (p=0.0008), but no clear trend was discernible.

    “There was some variation in score increase by household income (p=0·0008), although no clear trend was discernible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Increases in GHQ-12 scores were significant in both women and men overall and in most age groups, with steepest increases for women aged 16-44 and men aged 16-24.

    “The increases were significant (as shown by their non-overlapping confidence intervals) in both women and men overall and in most age groups. Increases were steepest for women aged 16–44 years, and men aged 16–24 (appendix p 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Living with children significantly modified the effect (p=0.0003); those with children younger than 5 had a 1.45 (0.79-2.12) point increase in GHQ-12 score after adjustment.

    “Living with children in the house significantly modified the effect (p=0·0003): those with children younger than 5 years had a 1·45 (0·79 to 2·12) point increase in GHQ-12 score after adjustment for other factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean GHQ-12 score in 18-24-year-olds was 2.69 points (95% CI 1.89-3.48) higher than expected from pre-pandemic trends, and in 25-34-year-olds it was 1.57 points (0.96-2.18) higher.

    “The mean score in 18–24-year-olds was 2·69 points (95% CI 1·89 to 3·48) higher than would have been expected from the trends observed before the pandemic, and in 25–34-year-olds was 1·57 points (0·96 to 2·18) higher.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adjusted estimates indicated that women experienced an increase of 0.92 points (95% CI 0.50-1.35), while there was no evidence of higher than expected scores for men (0.06, −0.37 to 0.48).

    “Adjusted estimates indicated that women experienced an increase of 0·92 points (95% CI 0·50 to 1·35) whereas there was no evidence of higher than expected scores for men (0·06, −0·37 to 0·48).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The longitudinal analysis used a weighting variable that adjusted for unequal selection probabilities and differential non-response to the COVID-19 web survey.

    “a weighting variable was used for the longitudinal analysis, which adjusted for unequal selection probabilities and differential non-response to the COVID-19 web survey.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    These results reflect the UK situation after one month in lockdown.

    “These results reflect the UK situation after one month in lockdown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Effects pertinent to lockdown include acute financial strain, household dynamics, and having an underlying mental or physical health condition.

    “Effects pertinent to lockdown include acute financial strain (low income, unemployment), household dynamics (domestic violence, living alone or with young children not attending nursery or school),9 and having an underlying mental or physical health condition”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    As of May 2020, the weighting variable was a beta-version, and later refinements are unlikely to substantially change the results.

    “As of May, 2020, this weight was released as a beta-version and slight future refinements of the weighting models are possible, but unlikely to have a substantial effect on results.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Waves 6-9 of the UKHLS contained 53,351 participants, and 42,330 people from households in Waves 8 or 9 were eligible for the COVID-19 web survey.

    “Waves 6–9 of the UKHLS had 53 351 participants, and 42 330 people from households that took part in Waves 8 or 9 were eligible for invitation to take part in the COVID-19 web survey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    In the study data, all covariates except GHQ-12 had less than 1% missing values, while GHQ-12 was missing for 4.2% of respondents.

    “All covariates had less than 1% missing data except for the GHQ-12 scores, which were positioned at the end of the web-survey, and which were missing for 4·2% of respondents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Specific effects include being a keyworker exposed to potential infection.

    “specific effects include being a keyworker exposed to potential infection.10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Changes in mental health during the public health emergency might not be evenly distributed across the population.

    “However, changes in mental health during the public health emergency might not be evenly distributed across the population.8”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The COVID-19 web-survey sample comprised 17,452 participants aged 16 years and older and was weighted to be representative of the UK population.

    “The COVID-19 web-survey sample comprised 17 452 participants, aged 16 years and older, weighted to be representative of the UK population (table 1 )”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Mental health was assessed with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), a validated measure of non-specific mental distress over the past 2 weeks that performs well in longitudinal samples.

    “The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a validated measure of non-specific mental distress in the past 2 weeks, which performs well in longitudinal samples.16”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Web-survey interviews were completed by 15,835 of 32,596 Wave 9 participants, a response rate of 48.6%; including Wave 8 participants, 17,452 of 42,330 (41.2%) took part.

    “Web-survey interviews were completed (full and partial) by 15 835 of the 32 596 participants of Wave 9, representing a response rate of 48·6%. When also including those who took part in Wave 8 (but not Wave 9), 17 452 (41·2%) participated of the total sample of 42 330”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of the 17,452 participants, 1,556 were excluded for missing GHQ-12 outcome data and 520 for lacking a matched previous GHQ-12 measure, leaving 15,376 in the fixed-effects regression.

    “Of the 17 452 participants, 1556 were excluded because of missing GHQ-12 outcome data, and 520 because they were unmatched to a previous GHQ-12 measure, with 15 376 included in the fixed-effects regression analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Anxieties about infection risk could be particularly high for some people.

    “For others, anxieties about infection risk could be particularly high.11”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The probability sample was drawn from postal addresses.

    “The probability sample was drawn from postal addresses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The threshold for clinically significant mental distress was a GHQ-12 score of 4 or more, following the Health Survey for England Official Statistics indicator.

    “The cutoff for the threshold measure was a score of 4 or more, as used on the Health Survey for England Official Statistics indicator.17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Fixed-effects regression models were fitted to identify within-person change compared with preceding trends.

    “Fixed-effects regression models were fitted to identify within-person change compared with preceding trends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study protocol was pre-registered on OSF Registries before any outcome data analysis.

    “The study protocol was pre-registered on OSF Registries before any outcome data analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One study found increased rates of psychological distress among US adults in April 2020 compared with 2018, with the increase greatest in young people aged 18-24 years and women.

    “One study found increased rates of psychological distress among US adults in April, 2020, compared with those in 2018, and that the increase was greatest in young people aged 18–24 years and women.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although COVID-19 poses the greatest physical health risk to older people, the mental health of young people might be disproportionately affected by transmission mitigation strategies and government pandemic responses.

    “Although COVID-19 presents the greatest physical health risk to older people, the mental health of the young might be disproportionately affected by transmission mitigation strategies and the pandemic response of governments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Response to the COVID-19 wave questionnaire was less than 50% and varied by age, gender, ethnic group, health status, and other characteristics; non-response was adjusted for via survey weights, but attrition remains a potential source of bias.

    “However, although the UKHLS is a high-quality probability sample cohort study, response to the COVID-19 wave questionnaire was less than 50%, and varied by age, gender, ethnic group, health status, and other characteristics (appendix p 1). Non-response was adjusted for via application of survey weights, but attrition remains a potential source of bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The higher than projected increase in mental distress did not affect all groups equally; some subgroups showed little or no additional distress while others showed marked increases.

    “This higher than projected increase in mental distress did not affect all groups equally, with people in some demographic subgroups showing little (or no) additional mental distress after lockdown, while other subgroups showed marked increases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Some inequalities decreased; those employed before the pandemic experienced a marked deterioration in mental health.

    “However, some inequalities decreased—for example, those in employment pre-pandemic experienced a marked deterioration in their mental health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    For these categories, established pre-pandemic inequalities in mental health were maintained, but they had not significantly increased by the end of the first month of lockdown.

    “For these categories, established pre-pandemic inequalities in mental health were maintained, but they had not significantly increased by the end of the first month of the lockdown period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    No contemporaneous control group was available, so secular changes cannot be ruled out, aside from those predicted from previous data.

    “Finally, no contemporaneous control group was available so we cannot rule out secular changes, aside from those predicted from previous data, which would have occurred anyway.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Although the sample was large, it was underpowered to detect change for some groups, specifically lacking scope to examine significant change by different ethnic groups and for men and women separately within ethnic groups.

    “Although the sample was large, it was underpowered to detect change for some groups. Specifically, a major limitation was the lack of scope to examine significant change by different ethnic groups, and for men and women separately within ethnic groups, particularly when considering the high prevalence of mental distress evident in the descriptive analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The GHQ-12 underestimates both socioeconomic and ethnic disparities.

    “The GHQ-12 underestimates both socioeconomic and ethnic disparities.18”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Between Wave 9 and the COVID-19 survey, the mode of questionnaire administration changed from face-to-face with an interviewer present to online, which could have affected reporting and introduced bias.

    “Between Wave 9 and the COVID-19 survey, necessary changes were introduced in the mode of the questionnaire administration that could have affected reporting: in Wave 9 the GHQ-12 was self-completed with the interviewer present as part of a face-to-face interview, whereas the COVID-19 questionnaire was completed online.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Certain groups experienced higher mental distress than others, indicating persistence of ethnic and socioeconomic health inequalities.

    “Certain groups experienced higher mental distress than did others, indicating persistence of ethnic and socioeconomic health inequalities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Some groups experienced higher than expected increases in mental distress, widening pre-existing age and gender inequalities.

    “Some experienced higher than expected increases in mental distress, which widened pre-existing age and gender inequalities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This finding supports previous reports of high prevalence of common mental disorder and self-harm in girls and women aged 16-24 years.

    “This supports results of previous reports of high prevalence of common mental disorder and self-harm in girls and women aged 16–24 years;7, 25, 26, 27”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Women, young people, and those with preschool-aged children are experiencing the greatest increase in mental distress.

    “Women, young people, and those with preschool aged children are experiencing the greatest increase in mental distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the absence of the pandemic, the pre-2018 upward trend in mental distress would have continued into 2020.

    “This was 0·48 (95% CI 0·07–0·90) points higher than expected when accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018.”
    “A positive coefficient from the fixed-effects model indicates worsening mental distress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and accounts for any existing trends in psychological distress that were already occurring over time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The observed changes in mental distress are attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than to other contemporaneous factors.

    “This is the first dataset to allow the change in UK mental distress attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic to be discerned”
    “A positive coefficient from the fixed-effects model indicates worsening mental distress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The GHQ-12 administered by self-completion in the COVID-19 web survey is comparable to its administration in previous waves.

    “It was administered by self-completion in Waves 6–9 and as part of the COVID-19 web survey”
    “The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a validated measure of non-specific mental distress in the past 2 weeks, which performs well in longitudinal samples.16”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The UKHLS sample and COVID-19 web survey respondents are representative of the UK adult population.

    “The probability sample was drawn from postal addresses.”
    “17 452 (41·2%) of 42 330 eligible people participated in the web survey.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pre-pandemic trends in GHQ-12 scores from 2014–19 would have continued.

    “Overall, GHQ-12 scores were 0·48 points (95% CI 0·07 to 0·90) greater than would have been expected had trends observed in the years before the COVID-19 pandemic continued.”
    “we estimate that the average score was 0·48 points higher than would have been expected had trajectories from 2014–19 continued.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A GHQ-12 score of four or more indicates a clinically significant level of mental distress.

    “exceeding the threshold score indicative of a clinically significant level of mental distress”
    “a high score threshold was applied (four or more) for the analysis of prevalence”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is in line with previous findings on differences in the development of internal symptoms such as negative affect.

    “This is in line with previous findings on differences in the development of internal symptoms such as negative affect (e.g., Hankin & Abramson, 2001; Gomez-Baya et al., 2017; Pierce et al., 2020).”

    From Adolescent Loneliness and Negative Affect during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Extraversion and Neuroticism (2023) · cites this paper as Pierce et al., 2020

    The Results (page not specified) report that mental distress changed differently by age and gender, with particularly steep increases among young people and women. The paper measures changes in general mental distress around the COVID-19 pandemic; it does not specifically examine negative affect or the developmental course of internalising symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals employed prior to the lockdown experienced increased levels of distress due to the stress of working from home, being furloughed, concerns about safety at work and future unemployment.

    “Pierce and et al. (2020) also suggest that individuals employed prior to the lockdown experienced increased levels of distress due to the stress of working from home, being furloughed, concerns about safety at work and future unemployment.”

    From Living through lockdown: A qualitative exploration of individuals' experiences in the UK. (2022) · cites this paper as Pierce et al., 2020

    The Results (page not provided) report a greater-than-expected increase in distress among people employed before the pandemic. The Discussion (page not provided) lists furlough, homeworking, job loss and exposure to infection as circumstances some of them may have faced, but does not establish that these factors—or concerns about future unemployment—caused the increase. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pierce et al. found the population prevalence of clinically significant mental distress rose about 10%, from 18.9% in 2018-19 to 27.3% in April 2020.

    “Pierce et al. [15] found that the population prevalence of clinically significant levels of mental distress rose about 10%, from 18.9% in 2018–19 to 27.3% in April 2020.”
  • In the beginning of the pandemic, young adults displayed the largest increase in mental health problems compared to older groups.

    “In the beginning of the pandemic, young adults also displayed the largest increase in mental health problems compared to older groups (Pierce et al., 2020).”
  • Young people's mental health has been disproportionately negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Piloting digital well-being interventions for young people is especially relevant in light of evidence showing young people's mental health has been disproportionately negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (Pierce et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020b; O'Connor et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020a) and the lack of currently empirically validated, widely-available options for mental health support.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Different numbers reported for April 2020 prevalence

    Minor

    The paper gives two different April 2020 prevalence estimates for clinically significant mental distress in the overall population. One place states 27·3%, while another states 27·3% with a different confidence interval lower bound; the discrepancy is small but the quoted interval is inconsistent across the text.

  • Unemployment estimate falls outside its stated confidence interval

    Minor

    The reported estimate is −0·48, but both stated confidence limits are below −1·55. The limits are also presented in descending order.

  • The lower confidence limit for distress prevalence differs

    Minor

    The same April 2020 prevalence of 27·3% is given with a lower 95% confidence limit of 26·4% in one results passage and 26·3% in another.

  • Eligibility age is stated two different ways

    Minor

    One methods passage says invitees had to be older than 16, while another explicitly includes people aged 16.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierce, M., Hope, H., Ford, T., Hatch, S., Hotopf, M., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R., Wessely, S., McManus, S., & Abel, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pierce, Matthias
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
883-892
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044137491
Cited by
2,621
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 277 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 685 · 2021: 796 · 2020: 129
FWCI
207.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Health Foundation
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, psychological distress, lockdown, GHQ-12, UK Household Longitudinal Study, temporal trends, within-person change, young adults, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sampling Studies, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review