The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 15 of the 27 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves
Open accessOverview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes a hierarchical framework for defining marine heatwaves (MHWs), with a general qualitative definition and a specific quantitative definition: anomalously warm events lasting ≥5 days above the 90th percentile of a 30-year baseline. It illustrates the metrics on three 21st-century MHWs and recommends consistent metrics for global comparisons.
Key findings
- A MHW is generally defined as a prolonged discrete anomalously warm water event described by duration, intensity, rate of evolution, and spatial extent; specifically, it lasts five or more days with temperatures warmer than the 90th percentile based on a 30-year historical baseline, with gaps of ≤2 days treated as continuous.
- The hierarchical metrics are primary (duration, maximum/mean/cumulative intensity), secondary (rate of onset/decline, spatial extent), and tertiary (preconditioning factors); the definition was implemented in a free Python package, marineHeatWaves.
- For Western Australia, 59 MHW events were identified between 1982 and 2014; the 2011 Ningaloo Niño was the largest by maximum intensity (6.50°C) and mean intensity (3.21°C), lasting 60 days with cumulative intensity of 192°C days, while the longest event lasted 95 days in 1999.
- For the northern Mediterranean, 70 events were identified; the 2003 MHW was largest by mean intensity (4.06°C), lasting 30 days with maximum intensity 5.02°C. For the northwest Atlantic, 67 events were identified; the longest lasted 187 days (31 July 2012–2 February 2013) with maximum intensity 4.00°C, mean intensity 2.37°C, and cumulative intensity 443°C days.
Methods
- The paper synthesizes lessons from atmospheric heatwave definitions, especially Perkins and Alexander (2013), to propose qualitative and quantitative MHW definitions; a sensitivity analysis for the five-day minimum duration used high-resolution (1/4°), global, daily SSTs from AVHRR satellite data (NOAA OI SST V2).
- Three case-study regions—Western Australia 2011, northern Mediterranean 2003, and northwest Atlantic 2012—were analyzed using 1/4° daily NOAA OI SST time series, with metrics calculated via the marineHeatWaves Python code.
- A dataset comparison for the 2011 Ningaloo Niño used monthly and weekly Reynolds SST, daily satellite NOAA OISST, and an hourly in situ logger from Jurien Bay; Table 3 qualitatively scores different data sources for their ability to provide primary, secondary, and tertiary MHW metrics.
Limitations
- The paper states that the qualitative definition may have limited application in intertidal zones, where ecological responses to high sea temperatures are mediated by air temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric conditions.
- The paper states that limitations in baseline length, quality, consistency, resolution, and availability may restrict the method; remotely sensed data begin in the 1980s–1990s, so the climatological period may need to be shorter, and different datasets can provide substantially different MHW information despite using the same metrics.
- The paper states that certain indices may not be derivable from some data sources—for example, in situ data cannot provide spatial extent, and paleo proxies and traditional ecological data can at best provide quantitative information on long-lived MHWs. Evident from the text: the three case studies are illustrative rather than a global validation, and the tertiary preconditioning metric is left as a placeholder without formal definition.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 of 27 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“yet a consistent definition of MHWs does not exist.”
- Also stated in: § 1.1. Defining extreme temperatures in marine systems · p. 5 · plain
“Beyond coral reef research there is limited consistency regarding how MHW metrics are applied or how useful they are in ecological applications.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sorte et al. (2010) source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Selig et al. (2010) source
- Could not verifycites Marba et al. (2015) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Warming Rates in the Mediterranean: Observations and Model Hindcast” (page unavailable), the paper specifies how it characterizes heat waves, but does not discuss whether a consistent definition of marine heatwaves exists across studies. Searches for a consistent definition and for differing standards found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 1.1. Defining extreme temperatures in marine systems · p. 5 · plain
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“While useful for other purposes, paleo proxies and traditional ecological data can, at best, only provide quantitative information on long-lived MHWs (e.g. Zinke et al. 2014).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Zinke et al. 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (‘Coral paleoclimatic records’) and Methods (‘Proxy data treatment’; page unavailable) describe coral proxies used to quantify annually resolved sea-surface-temperature variability, including warm anomalies. The paper does not establish that paleo proxies can quantify only long-lived marine heatwaves, and it does not assess the limits of traditional ecological data. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This latter event is the 2012 northwest Atlantic event discussed in the literature (Mills et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014).”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Mills et al. 2013 source
The paper’s title and its temperature section identify and discuss the 2012 ocean heat wave in the Northwest Atlantic. This supports the citation’s identification of the event. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites Chen et al. 2014 source
The Introduction identifies anomalous warming in the Middle Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Maine in the first half of 2012 and links that warming to Mills et al. (2013). This supports identifying the cited event as the 2012 Northwest Atlantic warming event. Chen et al. do not establish a 56-day duration, but the citing sentence uses the citation to identify the event, not to substantiate its duration. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Datasets with a high spatial and temporal resolution have more variability than those aggregating across larger areas or based on (smoother) longer time means (Smale and Wernberg 2009).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Smale and Wernberg 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Satellite-derived vs. logger-derived data’ section says satellite SST data miss small-scale temperature fluctuations across time and space, supporting the point that coarse data can conceal variation. But it also reports greater spatial variability in the satellite SST measurements than in the logger measurements. The paper therefore does not support the claim as a general rule that higher-resolution datasets have more variability. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In this case, a MHW in a cold season could lead to suppressed or failed recruitment of habitat-forming seaweeds.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Andrews et al. (2014) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that this habitat-forming seaweed reproduces in winter and that elevated temperatures delay settlement and increase germling mortality. The ‘Latitudinal distribution of recruits’ section suggests that a summer heatwave may have contributed to recruitment failure in the following winter. The paper does not assess a heatwave occurring during the cold season itself, so that specific scenario is an extrapolation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with an imax and imean of 4.00°C and 2.37°C respectively”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An earlier event, lasting 21 days (4-24 July 2010), had the highest mean intensity (3.05°C) in the period considered”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the selected northwest Atlantic location, 67 events were identified ( Figure 3c)”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All datasets have a similar profile of the evolution of summer and the MHW including the rate of onset and decline, the duration of the event (measured in months), and a warm period preceding the main heatwave.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reconstructed SST products have the smallest variability, due to the coarse spatial (1° degree grid) and temporal (monthly and weekly) resolution.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 60
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A variety of impacts 4 have been associated with these anomalous events, including shifts in species ranges, local 5 extinctions and economic impacts on seafood industries through declines in important fishery 6 species and impacts on aquaculture.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Garrabou et al. 2009 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wernberg et al. 2013 source
- Partly supportedcites Mills et al. 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Ecological and Economic Impacts” section describes species range shifts, lobster mortality and substantial economic effects on fisheries. It does not document local extinctions or aquaculture impacts, and the economic harm it describes is not specifically attributed to declines in fishery species; lobster prices fell amid an influx of catch. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The high temporal resolution provided by the in situ logger data reveals higher temporal SST variability, but a lower peak intensity than the daily satellite dataset, consistent with previous analysis of sub-surface in situ and daily satellite data in this region (Smale and Wernberg 2009).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Smale and Wernberg 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Satellite-derived vs. logger-derived data’ section (page not available) says in situ recorders capture short-term temperature fluctuations that satellite data cannot resolve. It also reports that daily AVHRR temperatures were generally higher than logger temperatures, but gives this comparison for annual and seasonal means, not peak intensity. The claimed lower logger peak intensity is therefore not established by the cited analysis. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The general definition of atmospheric heatwaves is a prolonged period where temperatures are substantially hotter than normal (Perkins and Alexander 2013).”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Perkins and Alexander 2013 source
The Introduction defines heat waves broadly as consecutive days when conditions are excessively hotter than normal. This supports the citing sentence’s paraphrase of a prolonged period of unusually high temperatures; no page number is supplied in the passage. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“From examples such as the 2003 MHW in the northern Mediterranean Sea (Garrabou et al. 2009), the 2011 Ningaloo Niño in Western Australia (Feng et al. 2013) and the 2012 MHW in the northwest Atlantic (Mills et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014), it is clear that the atmosphere, land surface and ocean all may have important driving roles in how and where these prolonged heat events play out.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Garrabou et al. 2009 source
- Supportedcites Feng et al. 2013 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies the 2011 marine heat wave off Western Australia as a Ningaloo Niño and describes oceanic and atmospheric processes driving it. Feng et al. is cited as an example in a sentence drawing a broader conclusion from several events; that citation does not specifically attribute a land-surface driver to the Australian event. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites Mills et al. 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Northwest Atlantic temperature discussion says atmospheric blocking brought warm air into the region and contributed to the 2012 ocean heat wave; it also refers to atmosphere–ocean interactions. It does not identify the land surface as a driver of that event: Greenland melting is described as another likely consequence of the atmospheric conditions. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Based on these criteria, Perkins and Alexander (2013) define an atmospheric 138 heatwave when at least three consecutive days exceed a calendar day threshold defined as the 139 90 th percentile value for temperature.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Perkins and Alexander (2013) source
The Conclusions define CTX90pct as three or more consecutive days exceeding the calendar-day 90th percentile, and CTN90pct applies the corresponding threshold to nighttime temperatures. The heat-wave indices section specifies that these thresholds are calculated from maximum and minimum temperature, respectively. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“protecting high diversity coral reef areas with a high probability of catastrophic disturbances in the near future, including MHWs, may be less favourable in comparison with protecting an area with less biodiversity but a low probability for disturbance (Game et al. 2008).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Game et al. 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not available) says that, all else equal, protecting reefs at lower risk of catastrophic bleaching is preferable, and that improving persistence can require trade-offs with biodiversity coverage. It does not establish the specific comparison between a high-diversity, high-risk reef and a less-diverse, low-risk reef. The study models bleaching risk through 2100 but does not explicitly assess marine heatwaves as a broader category of disturbance. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A recent atmospherically driven marine heatwave in the northeast Pacific during the boreal winters of 2013-2015 had significant downstream effects on North American weather, and also disrupted northeast Pacific fisheries and coastal ecosystems (Bond et al. 2015; Hartman, 2015; Whitney 2015).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bond et al. 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not matchedcites Hartman, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Whitney 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but a lower maximum intensity (imax=4.24°C) than a 56 day event in 2012 (10 April - 4 June) where the imax was 4.89°C”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most intense event was in 2008 (imax = 5.05) lasting only 9 days (26 June to 4 July) with an imean of 3.87°C.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The longest event was still ongoing at the time of analysis, with 110 days (13 September - 31 December 2014 - the end of the dataset), with a lower imax (3.31°C) and imean (2.51°C), but the highest icum (276°C days).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that the 56 and 187 day events in 2012 are considered distinct, as the temperature dropped below the threshold for at least 3 days (5 days) between the two events.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the variability in SST magnitude clearly differs between the four datasets, and would result in different metrics of heatwave intensity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with the longest MHW lasting for 95 days (13 May 1999 - 15 August 1999) with a maximum (imax), mean (imean) and cumulative intensity (icum) of 3.60°C, 2.50 °C and 237°C days above the climatological mean, respectively.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The corresponding imean and icum for this 56 day event was 2.59°C and 145 °C days, respectively.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 2003 MHW was the largest event based on the imean (4.06°C; not shown in Figure 3b) and lasted 30 days by our definition (2 June - 1 July) with an imax of 5.02°C.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is followed by the daily satellite data, which are finer in spatial (0.25° degree grid) and temporal (daily) resolution.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity testing on daily data suggests that a 30-day 'moving window' is appropriate for smoothing climatology from daily data.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The WA and northwest Atlantic MHWs are the largest by maximum intensity, such that the red and yellow bars are the same.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In situ temperatures (e.g. loggers) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 (if multiple loggers), else N/A | 2 | High | High | Low | Low/ Med”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The northwest Atlantic event is not the largest according to duration or cumulative intensity, but the red bar obscures the yellow bar since they are so close in time.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A clear 8 definition will facilitate retrospective comparisons between MHWs, enabling the synthesis 9 and a mechanistic understanding of the role of MHWs in marine ecosystems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Marine heatwaves (MHWs) have been observed around the world and are expected to 3 increase in intensity and frequency under anthropogenic climate change.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction - Marine heatwaves and their ecological impact · p. 4 · hedged
“which may increase in frequency and magnitude as a result of anthropogenic climate change (IPCC 2012)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites IPCC 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction - Marine heatwaves and their ecological impact · p. 4 · hedged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“extreme temperature events can affect species distributions and alter ecosystem structure”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, monitoring heatwaves can lead to a better understanding of their development, characteristics and impacts.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under this definition, a MHW can be caused by a combination of atmospheric forcing (e.g. heating) and oceanic conditions (e.g. faster advection or advection of unusually warm water).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the MHW metrics can be calculated from gridded products, such as SST datasets, reconstructed observational data, and model/reanalysis data.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The qualitative definition of a MHW applies to ocean regions (including subsurface waters, estuarine, or enclosed seas such as the Mediterranean Sea or Baltic Sea)”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These metrics can be useful at different time scales in forecasting for the following days to weeks and for long-term projections.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Australia's Bureau of Meteorology OceanMAPS system predicts daily SSTs with a one-week lead time (www.csiro.au/bluelink/)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites www.csiro.au/bluelink/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“deployment of submerged data loggers close to the coastline and the use of oceanographic arrays for the open sea could provide information about heat penetration depths and durations”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is generally due to the resolution of the data, but can also relate to other issues of quality, consistency and instrumentation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lower spatial resolution data results in reduced intensity because neighbouring non-heatwave areas are included in mean values.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, Coral Reef Watch is based on near real-time monitoring during the warmest months of the year and is used to identify areas where conditions may be approaching those conducive to coral inform management actions (to reduce additional stressors for example) which can be implemented quickly (e.g. Beeden et al. 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Beeden et al. 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This also means that a MHW is not just limited to the warmer months, since for some biological applications the consideration of heatwaves in colder months is essential.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Besides near real-time monitoring, the metrics can be used to estimate the prevalence of future MHWs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“metrics discussed here and applied to daily SST data would allow warnings to be issued when bleaching (http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/index.php).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For other research applications, such as studies of large-scale climate variability, MHW metrics may require further modification based on the resolution of datasets being used.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only can different datasets generate different values for the same metric, certain indices may simply not be appropriate or derivable from some data sources.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, resolution may be reduced due to the coarseness of spatial grids and, in the case of regional models, the domain they cover.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, we recommend five days as a balance to achieve relatively uniform global MHW counts under current climatic conditions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: A five-day minimum duration is appropriate for ecological processes and impacts.
In the paper
“their POAMA model predicts monthly SSTs for the upcoming nine months (www.bom.gov.au/climate/poama2.4/poama.shtml)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites www.bom.gov.au/climate/poama2.4/poama.shtml
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Primary metrics allow for the most general comparison between duration and magnitude (intensity).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This set of metrics allows different MHW events to be uniquely described and compared ( Figure 2 ).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A hierarchy is useful as different temperature datasets, based on their spatial and temporal resolution, have different abilities to provide different metrics.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, by using a percentile rather than standard deviation definition no assumption is made regarding the underlying distribution of anomalies.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: A 90th percentile threshold is appropriate for defining marine heatwaves across regions.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Near real-time monitoring of ocean surface temperatures based on satellite data is possible”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“these metrics will likely be specific to particular habitats, regions and species via potential local adaptation to extremes (Palumbi et al. 2014)”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Palumbi et al. 2014 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A percentile threshold is recommended rather than an absolute value above the climatological value as the magnitude of variability across a range of timescales varies considerably by region.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: A 90th percentile threshold is appropriate for defining marine heatwaves across regions.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using them within a forecasting framework would lead to near-term prediction of MHWs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While coarser resolution datasets may provide information about larger areas and/or longer time periods, this information may not be particularly relevant for marine managers or policy makers who require accurate local scale information, particularly on magnitude, to assess likely impacts.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An absolute threshold (e.g. 2°C anomaly) would only be relevant in terms of impacts in some regions but not in others (e.g. due to species acclimation).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: A 90th percentile threshold is appropriate for defining marine heatwaves across regions.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A lower intensity MHW (panel d ) is distinguished by its maximum intensity (imax), while a short MHW (panel e ) is distinguished by its duration ( D ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The three-tier framework allows for an over-arching and consistent measurement of heatwaves, while also providing flexibility in specifying additional metrics, if necessary.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Including MHW metrics in the forecasting based on daily predictions would help to identify areas where MHWs may occur and actions could be implemented weeks ahead of time”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It will also facilitate the comparison of observed events against those simulated in model projections, which will be very useful in understanding plausible future changes in MHWs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Projections beyond the near-term could identify future MHW risk areas.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This will facilitate comparisons between different MHW events, across seasons and at regional scales.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While 10% of days will be above this threshold”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The likelihood of an area experiencing extreme climatic events could thus be used to decide which areas should be protected and which are less resilient and prone to strong impacts with low expectations of recovery.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Marine heatwaves are an emerging area of interdisciplinary research with potential for collaborative initiatives in understanding these phenomena.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This event, along with the 2003 Mediterranean Sea, 2011 Western Australia and 2012 Northwest Atlantic MHW, provide an opportunity to investigate the drivers and anomalous properties of MHWs under a hierarchical framework.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such an approach can be used to identify regions that may be particularly susceptible to MHWs (i.e. areas subjected to intense human impacts) or regions where ecological impacts may be particularly severe (i.e. hotspots of biodiversity).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The adverse impacts of these events span a vast range of marine ecosystems.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Daily climatological threshold time series (e.g. 90 th percentile) may need to be smoothed in order to extract a useful climatology from inherently variable data.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This asymmetric MHW (b) is distinguished from one with a slow onset and rapid decline (panel c ) by the rate of warming (ronset) metric.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assessments of spatial and temporal variability in the occurrence of MHWs can be combined with analyses of other important aspects of the marine environment”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The use of standardised software would ensure consistency in calculating metrics”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Factors such as time of year relative to the onset of the MHW, or periods of above mean temperature preceding the MHW may lead to greater impacts.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A lower intensity MHW (panel d ) is distinguished by its maximum intensity (imax), while a short MHW (panel e ) is distinguished by its duration ( D ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A marine heat wave (MHW) with regular warming onset and decline (panel a ) can be distinguished from one with similar duration and maximum intensity but asymmetric warming (panel b ) by the cumulative intensity metric (icum).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
A five-day minimum duration is appropriate for ecological processes and impacts.
“Our general recommendation is that the MHW needs to persist for at least five days.”
“the definition should be relevant to ecological processes and thresholds (based on evidence of impact), but for each process this threshold may be different.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A 90th percentile threshold is appropriate for defining marine heatwaves across regions.
“A MHW should be defined relative to a high percentile threshold (e.g. 90%).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The thermal thresholds of performance of different biological traits must be known to identify the risk of MHW impacts on biological activity.
“In order to identify the risk of MHW impacts on biological activity, the thermal thresholds of the performance of different biological traits must also be known, and is the subject of ongoing research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is generally rare for five consecutive days above their relative 90th percentile to occur.
“it is generally 'rare' for (five) consecutive days above their relative 90 th percentile to occur.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Shorter heat spikes may have ecological impacts in the ocean.
“Shorter heat spikes may have ecological impacts in the ocean, but these are distinct features”
The paper relies on this without support.
Confidence in the robust detection of MHWs and capacity to compare between events and examine spatiotemporal trends will only be achieved with the use of high-quality datasets.
“Confidence in the robust detection of MHWs (and capacity to compare between events and examine spatiotemporal trends) will only be achieved with the use of high-quality datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The satellite-derived SST dataset allows for robust detection of MHWs.
“the satellite-derived SST dataset allows for robust detection of MHWs but should be complemented with high quality in situ data (e.g. from coastal temperature loggers or oceanographic moorings).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Atmospheric heatwaves are analogous to marine heatwaves.
“analogous to atmospheric heatwaves”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The marine heat wave definitions use daily sea surface temperature data and treat a marine heat wave as having a discrete start day and end day.
“All definitions assume that daily SST data, T, and that a MHW has a discrete start day and end day.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table 3 assigns the wrong unit to mean intensity
MinorTable 3 groups mean intensity and cumulative intensity under °C days, whereas Table 2 assigns mean intensity the unit °C. °C days applies to cumulative intensity, not mean intensity.
“i mean , i cum [°C days]”
“| | Intensity (max/mean/var iance) | threshold i max : highest temperature anomaly value during the MHW i mean : mean temperature anomaly during the MHW | , | °C |”
Figure 4 dates the 2011 Ningaloo Niño to the following summer
MinorThe text places the Western Australia heatwave in the austral summer of 2011 and links it to the 2010/11 La Niña, but the Figure 4 legend marks the heatwave from December 2011 to April 2012.
“Figure 4 . Temperature time series during the twelve months bounding the 2011 'Ningaloo Niño' marine heat wave (shaded area: December 2011 to April 2012)”
“More recently, during the austral summer of 2011, a MHW off Western Australia (a so-called 'Ningaloo Niño') was largely driven by atmospheric and oceanographic processes associated with the strong 2010/11 La Niña”
Citations
Cites
A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems
Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01286 · Cited by 11,265
Barker, T. J., Bashmakov, I., Bernstein, L., Bogner, J. R., Bosch, P. C., Dave, R., Davidson, O., Fisher, B. S., Grubb, M. J., Gupta, S. K., et al. (2007) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 9,160
A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems
Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., Kappel, C. V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J. F., Casey, K. S., Ebert, C., Fox, H. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149345 · Cited by 6,627
Thermal comfort: Analysis and applications in environmental engineering
Fanger, P. O. (1972) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(72)80074-7 · Cited by 4,515
Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation
Alexander, L. V., Zhang, X., Peterson, T. C., Caesar, J., Gleason, B., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Haylock, M., Collins, D., Trewin, B., Rahimzadeh, F., et al. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006290 · Cited by 4,492
Self-citationDaily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface Temperature
Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., & Schlax, M. G. (2007) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1824.1 · Cited by 4,435
More Intense, More Frequent, and Longer Lasting Heat Waves in the 21st Century
Meehl, G. A., & Tebaldi, C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098704 · Cited by 4,322
Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G., Allen, S., et al. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 3,037
Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data
Zhang, X., Alexander, L. V., Hegerl, G. C., Jones, P. D., Tank, A. K., Peterson, T. C., Trewin, B. C., & Zwiers, F. W. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.147 · Cited by 2,461
Self-citationGlobal imprint of climate change on marine life
Poloczanska, E. S., Brown, C. J., Sydeman, W. J., Kiessling, W., Schoeman, D. S., Moore, P. J., Brander, K., Bruno, J. F., Buckley, L. B., Burrows, M. T., et al. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1958 · Cited by 2,311
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 2,378
Marine heat waves drive bleaching and necrosis of temperate sponges
Bell, J. J., Smith, R. O., Micaroni, V., Strano, F., Balemi, C. A., Caiger, P. E., Miller, K. I., Spyksma, A. J. P., & Shears, N. T. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.013 · Cited by 53
Sun, W., Zhou, S., Yang, J., Gao, X., Ji, J., & Dong, C. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15164068 · Cited by 51
Marine heatwaves and optimal temperatures for microbial assemblage activity
Joint, I. R., & Smale, D. A. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiw243 · Cited by 55
Self-citationHow are warm and cool years in the C alifornia C urrent related to ENSO ?
Fiedler, P. C., & Mantua, N. J. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans · doi:10.1002/2017jc013094 · Cited by 49
Marine Heatwaves in the Arctic Region: Variation in Different Ice Covers
Hu, S., Zhang, L., & Qian, S. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl089329 · Cited by 53
Alsuwaiyan, N. A., Vranken, S., Filbee‐Dexter, K., Cambridge, M. L., Coleman, M. A., & Wernberg, T. (2021) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps13802 · Cited by 49
Transcriptome analysis reveals acclimation responses of pearl oysters to marine heatwaves
Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151189 · Cited by 48
The nutritional and sensory quality of seafood in a changing climate
Shalders, T. C., Champion, C., Coleman, M. A., & Benkendorff, K. (2022) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105590 · Cited by 54
He, G., Xiong, X., Peng, Y., et al. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158726 · Cited by 48
Assessing Predictability of Marine Heatwaves With Random Forests
Giamalaki, K., Beaulieu, C., & Prochaska, J. X. (2022) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2022gl099069 · Cited by 49
Zhan, W., Zhang, Y., He, Q., & Zhan, H. (2023) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.12388 · Cited by 53
Schaeffer, A., Gupta, A. S., & Roughan, M. (2023) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00966-4 · Cited by 62
The sugar kelp Saccharina latissima I: recent advances in a changing climate
Diehl, N., Li, H., Scheschonk, L., Burgunter‐Delamare, B., Niedzwiedz, S., Forbord, S., Sæther, M., Bischof, K., & Monteiro, C. (2023) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcad173 · Cited by 48
Marine protected areas promote stability of reef fish communities under climate warming
Benedetti‐Cecchi, L., Bates, A. E., Strona, G., Bulleri, F., Costa, B. H. E., Edgar, G. J., Hereu, B., Reed, D. C., Stuart‐Smith, R. D., Barrett, N. S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44976-y · Cited by 56
Effects of an experimental heat wave on fatty acid composition in two Mediterranean seagrass species
Beca‐Carretero, P., Guihéneuf, F., Marín‐Guirao, L., Bernardeau‐Esteller, J., García‐Muñoz, R., Stengel, D. B., & Ruiz, J. M. (2018) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.057 · Cited by 48
Another Decade of Marine Climate Change Experiments: Trends, Progress and Knowledge Gaps
Bass, A. V., Wernberg, T., Thomsen, M. S., & Smale, D. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.714462 · Cited by 52
Self-citationLiu, J., Peng, W., Yu, F. G., Shen, Y., Yu, W., Lu, Y., Lin, W., Zhou, M., Huang, Z., Luo, X., et al. (2022) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13388 · Cited by 48
Surviving Heatwaves: Thermal Experience Predicts Life and Death in a Southern Ocean Diatom
Samuels, T., Rynearson, T. A., & Collins, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.600343 · Cited by 49
Juza, M., & Tintoré, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.610589 · Cited by 47
Thompson, A. R., Ben‐Aderet, N. J., Bowlin, N. M., Kacev, D., Swalethorp, R., & Watson, W. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16010 · Cited by 45
Jiang, M., Gao, L., Huang, R., Lin, X., & Gao, G. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156591 · Cited by 49
Chen, X., Reich, P. B., Taylor, A. R., An, Z., & Chang, S. X. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53004-y · Cited by 56
Climate change will amplify the impacts of harmful microorganisms in aquatic ecosystems
Seymour, J. R., & McLellan, S. L. (2025) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-025-01948-2 · Cited by 51
Warming sea surface temperatures fuel summer epidemics of eelgrass wasting disease
Groner, M. L., Eisenlord, M. E., Yoshioka, R., Fiorenza, E. A., Dawkins, P. D., Graham, O., Winningham, M., Vompe, A. D., Rivlin, N. D., Yang, B., et al. (2021) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps13902 · Cited by 47
Bennett, S., Alcoverro, T., Kletou, D., Antoniou, C., Boada, J., Buñuel, X., Cucala, L., Jordá, G., Kleitou, P., Roca, G., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17885 · Cited by 47
Androulidakis, Y. S., & Krestenitis, Y. Ν. (2022) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse10010042 · Cited by 47
Barkhordarian, A., Nielsen, D. M., & Baehr, J. (2022) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00461-2 · Cited by 51
Peruzza, L., Tucci, C. F., Frizzo, R., Riello, T., Quagliariello, A., Martino, M. E., Manuzzi, A., Rovere, G. D., Bonsembiante, F., Gelain, M. E., et al. (2023) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115192 · Cited by 50
Record-breaking persistence of the 2022/23 marine heatwave in the Mediterranean Sea
Marullo, S., Serva, F., Iacono, R., Napolitano, E., di Sarra, A. G., Meloni, D., Monteleone, F., Sferlazzo, D. M., Silvestri, L., de Toma, V., et al. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad02ae · Cited by 62
High Latitude Corals Tolerate Severe Cold Spell
Tuckett, C. A., & Wernberg, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00014 · Cited by 46
Short-Term Temperature Stress Results in Seagrass Community Shift in a Temperate Estuary
Shields, E. C., Parrish, D. B., & Moore, K. A. (2019) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-019-00517-1 · Cited by 47
Marine heatwave challenges solutions to human–wildlife conflict
Samhouri, J. F., Feist, B. E., Fisher, M. C., Liu, O., Woodman, S. M., Abrahms, B. L., Forney, K. A., Hazen, E. L., Lawson, D., Redfern, J. V., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.1607 · Cited by 49
Hu, L. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl093260 · Cited by 55
Aoki, L. R., Rappazzo, B., Beatty, D. S., Domke, L. K., Eckert, G. L., Eisenlord, M. E., Graham, O., Harper, L. M., Hawthorne, T. L., Hessing-Lewis, M. L., et al. (2022) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.12152 · Cited by 50
Hot and cold marine extreme events in the Mediterranean over the period 1982-2021
Simon, A., Plecha, S. M., Russo, A., Teles‐Machado, A., Donat, M. G., Auger, P.-A., & Trigo, R. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.892201 · Cited by 52
Marine heatwaves and cold-spells in global coral reef zones
Yao, Y., & Wang, C. (2022) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102920 · Cited by 47
Burn, D., Hoey, A. S., Matthews, S. A., Harrison, H. B., & Pratchett, M. S. (2023) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114907 · Cited by 50
Radfar, S., Moftakhari, H. R., & Moradkhani, H. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01578-2 · Cited by 60
Menna, M., Gačić, M., Martellucci, R., Notarstefano, G., Fedele, G., Mauri, E., Gerin, R., & Poulain, P. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14061322 · Cited by 45
El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) effects on fisheries and aquaculture
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca8348en · Cited by 44
Propagation of the 2014–2016 Northeast Pacific Marine Heatwave Through the Salish Sea
Khangaonkar, T., Nugraha, A., Yun, S. K., Premathilake, L., Keister, J. E., & Bos, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.787604 · Cited by 44
Hartog, J. R., Spillman, C. M., Smith, G., & Hobday, A. J. (2023) · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2023.105276 · Cited by 58
Self-citationMarine heatwaves characteristics in the Mediterranean Sea: Case study the 2019 heatwave events
Hamdeno, M., & Azcarate, A. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1093760 · Cited by 44
Coastal and regional marine heatwaves and cold spells in the northeastern Atlantic
Simon, A., Poppeschi, C., Plecha, S. M., Charria, G., & Russo, A. (2023) · Ocean science · doi:10.5194/os-19-1339-2023 · Cited by 55
Impact of an unprecedented marine heatwave on extremely hot summer over Northern Japan in 2023
Sato, H., Takemura, K., Ito, A., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65291-y · Cited by 44
Cochrane, K. L., Rakotondrazafy, H., Aswani, S., Chaigneau, T., Downey, N. J., Lemahieu, A., Paytan, A., Pecl, G. T., Plagányi, É. E., Popova, E. E., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00505 · Cited by 46
Schubert, N., Salazar, V. W., Rich, W. A., Vivanco‐Bercovich, M., Saá, A. C. A., Fadigas, S. D., Silva, J., & Horta, P. A. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.280 · Cited by 51
Thorson, J., Adams, G., & Holsman, K. K. (2019) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12398 · Cited by 35
Subseasonal prediction of the 2020 Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea marine heatwave
Benthuysen, J. A., Smith, G., Spillman, C. M., & Steinberg, C. R. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac3aa1 · Cited by 44
Mercado, J. M., Gómez-Jakobsen, F., Korbee, N., Avilés, A., Bonomi‐Barufi, J., Muñoz, M. J., Reul, A., & Figueroa, F. L. (2022) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113315 · Cited by 44
Characterizing global marine heatwaves under a spatio-temporal framework
Sun, D., Jing, Z., Li, F., & Wu, L. (2022) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102947 · Cited by 49
Heatwave restructures marine intertidal communities across a stress gradient
Whalen, M. A., Starko, S., Lindstrom, S. C., & Martone, P. T. (2023) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.4027 · Cited by 48
Multiple dimensions of extreme weather events and their impacts on biodiversity
González‐Trujillo, J. D., Román-Cuesta, R. M., Muñiz-Castillo, A. I., do Amaral, C. H., & Araújo, M. B. (2023) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03622-0 · Cited by 45
Arctic marine heatwaves forced by greenhouse gases and triggered by abrupt sea-ice melt
Barkhordarian, A., Nielsen, D. M., Olonscheck, D., & Baehr, J. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01215-y · Cited by 47
Climate change-driven cooling can kill marine megafauna at their distributional limits
Lubitz, N., Daly, R., Smoothey, A. F., Vianello, P., Roberts, M. J., Schoeman, D. S., Sheaves, M. J., Cowley, P. D., Dagorn, L., Forget, F. G., et al. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-024-01966-8 · Cited by 47
Living in Mediterranean cities in the context of climate change: A review
Nastos, P. T., & Saaroni, H. (2024) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.8546 · Cited by 54
The ocean losing its breath under the heatwaves
Li, C., Huang, J., Liu, X., Ding, L., He, Y., & Xie, Y. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51323-8 · Cited by 60
Wolfe, K., Nguyen, H. D., Davey, M., & Byrne, M. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15103 · Cited by 44
Freedman, R. M., Brown, J., Caldow, C., & Caselle, J. E. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77885-3 · Cited by 44
Diehl, N., Roleda, M. Y., Bartsch, I., Karsten, U., & Bischof, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.695821 · Cited by 49
Hotspots and drivers of compound marine heatwaves and low net primary production extremes
Grix, N. L., Jakob Zscheischler, A., Rodgers, K. B., Yamaguchi, R., & Frölicher, T. L. (2022) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-19-5807-2022 · Cited by 55
Gauci, C., Bartsch, I., Martins, N., & Liesner, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.862923 · Cited by 43
The record-breaking 2022 long-lasting marine heatwaves in the East China Sea
Oh, H., Kim, G., Chu, J., et al. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd267 · Cited by 42
Record High Sea Surface Temperatures in 2023
Huang, B., Yin, X., Carton, J. A., Chen, L., Graham, G., Hogan, P., Smith, T. M., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2024gl108369 · Cited by 45
Rendina, F., Bouchet, P. J., Appolloni, L., Russo, G. F., Sandulli, R., Kolzenburg, R., Putra, A., & Ragazzola, F. (2019) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.104764 · Cited by 46
Vajedsamiei, J., Melzner, F., Raatz, M., Lugo, S. C. M., & Pansch, C. (2021) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13889 · Cited by 45
Thielen, D., Ramoni‐Perazzi, P., Puche, M. L., Marquez, M. A., Quintero, J. I., Rojas, W., Soto‐Werschitz, A., Thielen, K., Nunes, A. M. B., & Libonati, R. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13213034 · Cited by 50
Kelp Gametophytes in Changing Oceans
Veenhof, R. J., Champion, C., Dworjanyn, S. A., Wernberg, T., Minne, A. J. P., Layton, C., Bolton, J. J., Reed, D. C., & Coleman, M. A. (2022) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003288602-7 · Cited by 49
Impacts of marine heatwaves in coastal ecosystems depend on local environmental conditions
Starko, S., van der Mheen, M., Pessarrodona, A., Wood, G. V., Filbee‐Dexter, K., Neufeld, C. J., Montie, S., Coleman, M. A., & Wernberg, T. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17469 · Cited by 46
Decadal-Scale Forecasting of Climate Drivers for Marine Applications
Salinger, M. J., Hobday, A. J., Matear, R. J., Okane, T., Risbey, J. S., Dunstan, P. K., Eveson, J. P., Fulton, E. A., Feng, M., Plagányi, É. E., et al. (2016) · Advances in marine biology · doi:10.1016/bs.amb.2016.04.002 · Cited by 41
Self-citationCan prior exposure to stress enhance resilience to ocean warming in two oyster species?
Pereira, R. R. D. C., Scanes, E., Gibbs, M. C., Byrne, M., & Ross, P. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228527 · Cited by 41
Spatiotemporal Variability and Trends of Marine Heat Waves in the Red Sea over 38 Years
Mohamed, B., Nagy, H., & Ibrahim, O. (2021) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse9080842 · Cited by 42
Cook, F., Smith, R. O., Roughan, M., Cullen, N. J., Shears, N. T., & Bowen, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.1012022 · Cited by 46
Desmet, F., Gruber, N., Köhn, E. E., Münnich, M., & Vogt, M. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans · doi:10.1029/2021jc018159 · Cited by 40
Wang, S., Jing, Z., Wu, L., Sun, S., Peng, Q., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Shi, J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35666-8 · Cited by 45
Zentner, Y., Rovira, G., Margarit, N., Ortega, J., Casals, D., Medrano, A., Pagès‐Escolà, M., Aspillaga, E., Capdevila, P., Figuerola‐Ferrando, L., et al. (2023) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110048 · Cited by 46
Joyce, P. W. S., Tong, C. B., Yip, Y. L., & Falkenberg, L. J. (2023) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-023-04340-y · Cited by 41
Duan, Z., Gao, W., Cheng, G., Zhang, Y., & Chang, X. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130971 · Cited by 41
Wang, B., Hua, L., Mei, H., Wu, X., Kang, Y., & Zhao, N. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10072-z · Cited by 52
Marcos, M., Amores, Á., Agulles, M., Robson, J. I., & Feng, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2413505122 · Cited by 46
Drivers of the extreme North Atlantic marine heatwave during 2023
England, M. H., Li, Z., Huguenin, M. F., Kiss, A. E., Gupta, A. S., Holmes, R. M., & Rahmstorf, S. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08903-5 · Cited by 42
Record-breaking 2023 marine heatwaves
Dong, T., Zeng, Z., Pan, M., Wang, D., Chen, Y., Liang, L., Yang, S., Jin, Y., Luo, S., Liang, S., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adr0910 · Cited by 50
Carneiro, A. P., Soares, C. H. L., Manso, P. R. J., & Pagliosa, P. R. (2020) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104898 · Cited by 43
Depth Structure of Ningaloo Niño/Niña Events and Associated Drivers
Ryan, S., Ummenhofer, C. C., Gawarkiewicz, G. G., Wagner, P. L., Scheinert, M., Biastoch, A., & Böning, C. W. (2020) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-1020.1 · Cited by 44
Alongshore upwelling modulates the intensity of marine heatwaves in a temperate coastal sea
Izquierdo, P., Taboada, F. G., González‐Gil, R., Arrontes, J., & Rico, J. M. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155478 · Cited by 45
Exploring Potential Links Between Co-occurring Coastal Terrestrial and Marine Heatwaves in Australia
Pathmeswaran, C., Gupta, A. S., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E., & Hart, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.792730 · Cited by 42
Sea level extremes and compounding marine heatwaves in coastal Indonesia
Han, W., Zhang, L., Meehl, G. A., Kido, S., Tozuka, T., Li, Y., McPhaden, M. J., Hu, A., Cazenave, A., Rosenbloom, N. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34003-3 · Cited by 53
The Continuum of Northeast Pacific Marine Heatwaves and Their Relationship to the Tropical Pacific
Xu, T., Newman, M., Capotondi, A. M., & Lorenzo, E. D. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl090661 · Cited by 42
Extremes, Abrupt Changes and Managing Risks
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157964.014 · Cited by 44
Straub, S. C., Wernberg, T., Marzinelli, E. M., Vergés, A., Kelaher, B. P., & Coleman, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.13222 · Cited by 43
Mandal, S., Susanto, R. D., & Ramakrishnan, B. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14071745 · Cited by 38
Du, Y., Wang, F., Wang, T., Liu, W., Liang, L., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Wu, W., Yu, K., et al. (2023) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104313 · Cited by 42
Rosselló, P., Pascual, A., & Combes, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1168368 · Cited by 46
Seasonal forecasting of subsurface marine heatwaves
McAdam, R., Masina, S., & Gualdi, S. (2023) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00892-5 · Cited by 41
Multispecies population-scale emergence of climate change signals in an ocean warming hotspot
Mills, K. E., Kemberling, A. A., Kerr, L. A., Lucey, S. M., McBride, R. S., Nye, J. A., Pershing, A. J., Barajas, M., & Lovas, C. S. (2023) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsad208 · Cited by 43
Summer heatwaves on the Baltic Sea seabed contribute to oxygen deficiency in shallow areas
Safonova, K., Meier, H. E. M., & Gröger, M. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01268-z · Cited by 42
Large potential impacts of marine heatwaves on ecosystem functioning
de Luzinais, V. G., Gascuel, D., Reygondeau, G., & Cheung, W. W. L. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17437 · Cited by 47
Anastasiadi, D., Shao, C., Chen, S., & Piferrer, F. (2020) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15764 · Cited by 44
Multiple climate-driven cascading ecosystem effects after the loss of a foundation species
Sarà, G., Giommi, C., Giacoletti, A., Conti, E., Mulder, C., & Mangano, M. C. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144749 · Cited by 38
On the uncertainty of future projections of Marine Heatwave events in the North Atlantic Ocean
Plecha, S. M., Soares, P. M. M., Silva-Fernandes, S. M., & Cabos, W. (2021) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05529-3 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobday, A. J., Alexander, L. V., Perkins, S. E., Smale, D. A., Straub, S. C., Oliver, E. C. J., Benthuysen, J. A., Burrows, M. T., Donat, M. G., Feng, M., Holbrook, N. J., Moore, P. J., Scannell, H. A., Sen Gupta, A., & Wernberg, T.
- Affiliations
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hobday, Alistair J.
- Venue
- Progress in Oceanography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 227-238
- ISSN
- 0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2230443456
- Semantic Scholar
- 08446f63a48c06f446c5b35fa80aa5d2250e9d08
- Cited by
- 2,377
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 410 · 2025: 466 · 2024: 422 · 2023: 341 · 2022: 261 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 46.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress In Oceanography (acceptedVersion)
- Marine Biological Association (acceptedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- University of Western Australia Research Collaboration Award
- UWA School of Plant Biology
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science
- ARC (DE140100952)
- MGD (DE150100456)
- LVA (CE110001028)
- NERC (NE/J024082/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Keywords
- marine heatwaves, ocean temperature anomalies, climate change impacts, range shifts, fisheries impacts, aquaculture impacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-16, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-16 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review