Cited by 123Retinal Development and DisordersRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; 22 of the 87 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina

Open access
Tang, Peter H., Kono, Masahiro, Koutalos, Yiannis, Ablonczy, Zsolt, Crouch, Rosalie K.·2013·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research

Abstract

Review of recent findings regarding transport of retinoids, mechanisms supplying chromophore to rods and cones, and metabolism of retinoids within the posterior segment of the eye.

Verified 2026-10-05 · 1 reference not checked yet

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes evidence that retinal chromophore supply involves both the classic RPE-based visual cycle and a cone-specific cycle involving Müller cells. It also highlights unexpected findings on RPE65 localization in cones and on A2E/lipofuscin distribution that challenge older models of retinoid metabolism and retinal degeneration.

Key findings

  • Two retinoid cycles are proposed: the classic visual cycle in the RPE supplies both rods and cones, while a cone-specific cycle involving Müller cells supplies cones, with DES1 proposed as an isomerase and 11-cis retinol as a cone-usable intermediate.
  • RPE65 is present in cones, but its role there is not isomerization; localization varies by species and cone type—mouse cone outer segments, human red/green cone outer segments but not blue cones, and the inner-segment paraboloid in cone-dominant Anolis lizard.
  • In mice, MALDI imaging showed A2E distribution correlated with lipofuscin fluorescence, with stronger correlation at older ages and in Abca4−/− mice; the oxidized A2E fraction was constant at 0.17 ± 0.03 oxygen per A2E. In human eyes, A2E did not correlate with lipofuscin and was 50–100-fold more abundant in the far periphery than in the center, independent of age.
  • 11-cis retinal itself can generate lipofuscin precursors without light, challenging the view that A2E and lipofuscin arise mainly from light-generated all-trans retinal.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review integrating biochemical, electrophysiological, imaging, genetic, and structural studies rather than reporting a single new experiment.
  • Data/sample: cited work across species and preparations, including mouse, salamander, frog, gecko, zebrafish, chicken, lizard, and human retina/RPE, as well as mouse models such as Rpe65−/−, Lrat−/−, Nrl−/−, Irbp−/−, and Abca4−/−.
  • Main analysis: thematic synthesis comparing classic and cone visual cycles, RPE65 localization and function, IRBP roles, retinoid reduction, lipofuscin/A2E formation, and therapeutic implications.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: many mechanisms remain unclear, including the role of RPE65 in cones, details of IRBP function in cone pigment regeneration, cone opsin trafficking, why human posterior pole fluorescence lacks high A2E, and how best to model the human retina.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, conclusions depend on cited studies that differ in species, mouse strain, antibodies, and methods; RPE65 detection in cones is noted as controversial because strain-dependent RPE65 levels and antibody affinity affect immunostaining.
  • Evident from the text: human A2E/lipofuscin findings come from postmortem eyes, and murine models may not fully represent human retinal organization or disease.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.09.002

Cites

181 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

22 of 87 cited sources checked · 18 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 52 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 37
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 3
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No evidence exists for RPE65 within Müller cells.

    “There is no evidence for the presence of RPE65 within Müller cells”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    When light is present, the all-trans retinal formed by light absorption is taken to be converted to all-trans retinol and moved to the RPE for ester storage.

    “Under light conditions, the all-trans retinal produced from the absorption of light is assumed to be reduced to all-trans retinol and then transported to the RPE where it is stored as the ester.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Retinol dehydrogenases are assigned opposite reaction directions

    Minor

    The paper says RDH8 and RDH12 reduce all-trans retinal to all-trans retinol, but later describes retinol dehydrogenases as oxidizing all-trans retinol to retinal. Those descriptions reverse the direction of the reaction attributed to the enzymes.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 194 references

12 of the 194 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, P. H., Kono, M., Koutalos, Y., Ablonczy, Z., & Crouch, R. K.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Crouch, Rosalie K.
Venue
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
32
Pages
48-63
ISSN
1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046951190
Cited by
122
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1c06rr015455-01a1)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY019065, R01EY014850, R21EY020661, R01EY019515, R01EY004939)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06 RR-015455, P41RR008605)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
retinoid cycle, 11-cis-retinal, vitamin A metabolism, chromophore regeneration, photoreceptors, rods, cones, RPE65, retinoid transport, visual pigments, G protein-coupled receptors, posterior segment of the eye
MeSH terms
Animals, Eye Proteins, Humans, Retina, Retinal Pigments, Retinoids, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review