Cited by 994Digital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0

Open access
Uhlemann, Thomas H.-J., Lehmann, Christian, Steinhilper, Rolf·2017·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

Concerning current approaches to planning of manufacturing processes, the acquisition of a sufficient data basis of the relevant process information and subsequent development of feasible layout options requires 74% of the overall time-consumption. However, the application of fully automated techniques within planning processes is not yet common practice. Deficits are to be observed in the course of the use of a fully automated data acquisition of the underlying process data, a key element of Industry 4.0, as well as the evaluation and quantification and analysis of the gathered data. As the majority of the planning operations are conducted manually, the lack of any theoretical evaluation renders a benchmarking of the results difficult. Current planning processes analyze the manually achieved results with the aid of simulation. Evaluation and quantification of the planning procedure are limited by complexity that defies manual controllability. Research is therefore required with regard to automated data acquisition and selection, as the near real-time evaluation and analysis of a highly complex production systems relies on a real-time generated database. The paper presents practically feasible approaches to a multi-modal data acquisition approach, its requirements and limitations. The further concept of the Digital Twin for a production process enables a coupling of the production system with its digital equivalent as a base for an optimization with a minimized delay between the time of data acquisition and the creation of the Digital Twin. Therefore a digital data acquisition approach is necessary. As a consequence a cyber-physical production system can be generated, that opens up powerful applications. To ensure a maximum concordance of the cyber-physical process with its real-life model a multimodal data acquisition and evaluation has to be conducted. The paper therefore presents a concept for the composition of a database and proposes guidelines for the implementation of the Digital Twin in production systems in small and medium-sized enterprises.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhlemann, T. H.-J., Lehmann, C., & Steinhilper, R.
Affiliations
University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Uhlemann, Thomas H.-J.
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
61
Pages
335-340
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607234710
Cited by
994
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 176 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 6
FWCI
88.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
digital twin, cyber-physical production systems, Industry 4.0, process planning, automated data collection, multimodal data acquisition, real-time analytics, production system optimization, small and medium-sized enterprises

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review