The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0
Open accessAbstract
Concerning current approaches to planning of manufacturing processes, the acquisition of a sufficient data basis of the relevant process information and subsequent development of feasible layout options requires 74% of the overall time-consumption. However, the application of fully automated techniques within planning processes is not yet common practice. Deficits are to be observed in the course of the use of a fully automated data acquisition of the underlying process data, a key element of Industry 4.0, as well as the evaluation and quantification and analysis of the gathered data. As the majority of the planning operations are conducted manually, the lack of any theoretical evaluation renders a benchmarking of the results difficult. Current planning processes analyze the manually achieved results with the aid of simulation. Evaluation and quantification of the planning procedure are limited by complexity that defies manual controllability. Research is therefore required with regard to automated data acquisition and selection, as the near real-time evaluation and analysis of a highly complex production systems relies on a real-time generated database. The paper presents practically feasible approaches to a multi-modal data acquisition approach, its requirements and limitations. The further concept of the Digital Twin for a production process enables a coupling of the production system with its digital equivalent as a base for an optimization with a minimized delay between the time of data acquisition and the creation of the Digital Twin. Therefore a digital data acquisition approach is necessary. As a consequence a cyber-physical production system can be generated, that opens up powerful applications. To ensure a maximum concordance of the cyber-physical process with its real-life model a multimodal data acquisition and evaluation has to be conducted. The paper therefore presents a concept for the composition of a database and proposes guidelines for the implementation of the Digital Twin in production systems in small and medium-sized enterprises.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uhlemann et al. emphasized the overall cost reductions resulting from improved operational efficiency.
“Additionally, Uhlemann et al. [113] emphasized the overall cost reductions resulting from improved operational efficiency.”
From Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [113]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2873186 · Cited by 4,391 · see citing works
Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 · Cited by 3,612 · see citing works
A survey on digital twin: definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., & Fogli, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953499 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 · Cited by 1,440 · see citing works
Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering
Madni, A. M., Madni, C. C., & Lucero, S. D. (2019) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems7010007 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models
Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.2998530 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Construction with digital twin information systems
Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., Xie, H. S., & Girolami, M. (2020) · Data-Centric Engineering · doi:10.1017/dce.2020.16 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Fabris, M., Abbriano, R. M., Pernice, M., Sutherland, D. L., Commault, A. S., Hall, C. C., Labeeuw, L., McCauley, J. I., Kuzhiuparambil, U., Ray, P., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00279 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
A survey of smart product-service systems: Key aspects, challenges and future perspectives
Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Chen, C.-H., & Pheng Khoo, L. (2019) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2019.100973 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
A Survey on Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Things: Applications, Technologies and Tools
Xu, H., Wu, J., Pan, Q., Guan, X., & Guizani, M. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3297395 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
IoT and digital twin enabled smart tracking for safety management
Zhao, Z., Shen, L., Yang, C., Wu, W., Zhang, M., & Huang, G. Q. (2021) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2020.105183 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Additive Manufacturing Cyber-Physical System: Supply Chain Cybersecurity and Risks
Gupta, N., Tiwari, A., Bukkapatnam, S. T. S., & Karri, R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2978815 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
“One of the main research thrusts of the manufacturing community for the past 30 years has been to harness the digital thread to create a computational framework—nowadays known as a digital twin— to emulate and analyze the product and the process before (for design and process planning), during (for quality assurance)…”
BackgroundConsistency check to synchronize the Digital Twin of manufacturing automation based on anchor points
Talkhestani, B. A., Jazdi, N., Schloegl, W., & Weyrich, M. (2018) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.166 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Warke, V., Kumar, S., Bongale, A., & Kotecha, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131810139 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Digital twin for integration of design-manufacturing-maintenance: an overview
Fu, Y., Zhu, G., Zhu, M., & Xuan, F. (2022) · Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1186/s10033-022-00760-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review
Ba, L., Tangour, F., El Abbassi, I., & Absi, R. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17083560 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Walton, R. B., Ciarallo, F. W., & Champagne, L. E. (2024) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110241 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Civil Infrastructure Digital Twins: Multi-Level Knowledge Map, Research Gaps, and Future Directions
Naderi, H., & Shojaei, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3223557 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Vertical data continuity with lean edge analytics for Industry 4.0 production
Küfner, T., Schönig, S., Jasinski, R., & Ermer, A. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103389 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Prasath, N., Arun, A., Saravanan, B., & Kamaraj, K. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology · doi:10.3233/jifs-233495 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Retracted
- Authors
- Uhlemann, T. H.-J., Lehmann, C., & Steinhilper, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Uhlemann, Thomas H.-J.
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 335-340
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2607234710
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 176 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 88.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- digital twin, cyber-physical production systems, Industry 4.0, process planning, automated data collection, multimodal data acquisition, real-time analytics, production system optimization, small and medium-sized enterprises
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review