Cited by 35Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementService and Product InnovationSustainable Design and Development

Defining value creation in the context of circular PSS

Open access
Widmer, Tobias, Tjahjono, Benny, Bourlakis, Michael·2018·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

The concept of a circular economy (CE) can be regarded as a way to operationalise the aim of accomplishing sustainable development (SD) on a macro level. Product-Service Sytems (PSS), business models (BM) that combine tangible products with intangible services to jointly satisfy a customer’s needs, are well suited to align with CE principles. Whether applying CE principles leads to value creation for a broader group of stakeholders, however, is not yet sufficiently proven. The study presents CE principles, elements that govern the decision-making process of a firm and uses the example of PSS to demonstrate how these principles are applied in the design of the supply chain network. A definition of value creation for multiple stakeholders is presented, and the example of mobility as a service used to highlight the importance of system and life cycle (LC) thinking to prevent rebound-effects and fully understand the trade-offs of a circular PSS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.329

Cites

30 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PSS creates a financial incentive for more diligent material stewardship.

    “By doing so PSS creates a financial incentive for more diligent material stewardship (Widmer et al., 2018).”

    From Facades-as-a-Service: Systemic managerial, financial, and governance innovation to enable a circular economy for buildings. Lessons learnt from a full-scale pilot project in the Netherlands (2023) · cites this paper as Widmer et al., 2018

    Section 3 (The rationale for circular PSS; page unavailable) says that providers of use- and result-oriented PSS may retain ownership and take responsibility for recovery and other end-of-life strategies. Section 4 (Value creation in circular PSS; page unavailable) links the choice of recovery strategy to value creation. The paper does not explicitly establish that PSS creates a financial incentive for more diligent material stewardship, and its account applies to particular PSS arrangements rather than PSS generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. European Environment Agency EEA, Circular economy in Europe - Developing the knowledge base, Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. doi:10.2800/51444. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Widmer, T., Tjahjono, B., & Bourlakis, M.
Affiliations
Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Widmer, Tobias
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
73
Pages
142-147
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810722430
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission (721909, HORIZON2020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
circular economy, product-service systems, value creation, stakeholder value, business models, supply chain network design, Mobility as a Service, life cycle thinking, rebound effect, sustainable development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review