Cited by 64Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Slow sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms are associated with poorer academic performance in children with ADHD

Open access
Tamm, Leanne, Garner, Annie A., Loren, Richard E.A., Epstein, Jeffery N., Vaughn, Aaron J., Ciesielski, Heather A., Becker, Stephen P.·2016·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) symptoms may confer risk for academic impairment in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We investigated SCT in relation to academic performance and impairment in 252 children (ages 6–12, 67% boys) with ADHD. Parents and teachers completed SCT and academic impairment ratings, and achievement in reading, math, and spelling was assessed. Simultaneous regressions controlling for IQ, ADHD, and comorbidities were conducted. Total SCT predicted parent-rated impairments in writing, mathematics, and overall school but not reading. Parent-rated SCT Slow predicted poorer reading and spelling, but not math achievement. Teacher-rated SCT Slow predicted poorer spelling and math, but not reading achievement. Parent-rated SCT Slow predicted greater academic impairment ratings across all domains, whereas teacher-rated SCT Slow predicted greater impairment in writing only. Age and gender did not moderate these relationships with the exception of math impairment; SCT slow predicted math impairment for younger but not older children. Parent and teacher SCT Sleepy and Daydreamy ratings were not significant predictors. SCT Slow appears to be uniquely related to academic problems in ADHD, and may be important to assess and potentially target in intervention. More work is needed to better understand the nature of SCT Slow symptoms in relation to inattention and amotivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.054

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an RCT with middle school students, a school-based organization/homework intervention reduced SCT symptoms per parent report but not per adolescent report.

    “In an RCT with middle school students, school-based organization/homework intervention reduced SCT symptoms per parent but not adolescent report.147”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [147]

    The Methods (Subjects and Procedures; page unavailable) describe 252 children aged 6–12 recruited through an outpatient ADHD clinic, with parent and teacher ratings and academic testing—not an RCT with middle school students. The Discussion (Limitations and future directions; page unavailable) says the study did not have information on homework completion or organization and recommends adding child self-reports in future studies. It reports no intervention or parent-versus-adolescent treatment effect. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - Text revision (4th ed., text rev ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamm, L., Garner, A. A., Loren, R. E. A., Epstein, J. N., Vaughn, A. J., Ciesielski, H. A., & Becker, S. P.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tamm, Leanne
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
242
Pages
251-259
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2418810549
Cited by
64
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio Department of Mental Health (ODMH#12.1281)
  • NIMH (K24MH064478, K23MH108603)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, academic performance, academic impairment, children, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, spelling, writing, parent and teacher ratings, inattention, amotivation
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Achievement, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Schools, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review