Cited by 51Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The neurocognitive nature of children with ADHD comorbid sluggish cognitive tempo: Might SCT be a disorder of vigilance?

Baytunca, Muharrem Burak, Inci, Sevim Berrin, Ipci, Melis, Kardas, Burcu, Bolat, Gul Unsel, Ercan, Eyup Sabri·2018·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) refers to a clinical construct including several symptoms such as sluggishness, absentmindedness, low energy. In the present study, we compared neurocognitive laboratory outcomes of ADHD children with or without SCT.Method The CNS Vital Signs Battery was utilized to measure neurocognitive measure of the participants. The SCT+ADHD group comprised of 42 subjects, ADHD group was 41 subjects and control group was 24 subjects.Results The cognitive flexibility score was found to be more severely impaired in ADHD children with SCT in comparison to the ADHD-only. Additionally, greater deficits in the Shifting Attention Test (p = 0.014) and the Continuous Performance Test (reaction time score, p < 0.01) were found in the SCT+ADHD group relative to ADHD group. Processing speed, visual/auditory memory, psychomotor speed and reaction time were not found to more impaired in those comorbid with SCT.Conclusion Impairments in the cognitive flexibility and more specifically shifting attention and continuous performance may be indicative of vigilance and orientation problems rather than executive functions for the SCT construct.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.038

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baytunca, M. B., Inci, S. B., Ipci, M., Kardas, B., Bolat, G. U., & Ercan, E. S.
Affiliations
Ege University (TR)
Corresponding author
Baytunca, Muharrem Burak
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
270
Pages
967-973
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793255303
Cited by
51
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi - AVESİS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, comorbidities, cognitive flexibility, attentional shift, sustained attention, continuous performance, reaction time, executive function, children
MeSH terms
Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Arousal, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Comorbidity, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review