Cited by 14Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The contribution of sluggish cognitive tempo to processing speed in survivors of pediatric brain tumors

Open access
Peterson, Rachel K., Jones, Kelly, Jacobson, Lisa A.·2021·Child Neuropsychology

Abstract

Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) describes a pattern of under-activity, poor initiation, and slowness. It was first reported within the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) literature and found to be positively associated with the inattentive symptoms of ADHD and negatively or not significantly associated with the hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms of ADHD. SCT has since been considered applicable to the pediatric oncology population given the emergence of inattentive, sluggish symptoms secondary to cancer treatment. The present study examined the unique contribution of SCT to various processing speed skills in a clinical sample of pediatric brain tumor (BT) survivors in order to determine the degree to which SCT explained timed “cognitive” processing components. Measures included speeded naming, graphomotor speed, and speeded inhibition. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to predict performance-based measures of processing speed. After controlling for verbal ability and inattention, SCT, particularly Daydreamy SCT (β = −0.698, p = 0.023), explained 28% of variance in speeded inhibition. SCT did not add significantly to the prediction of speeded naming or graphomotor speed. Findings suggest that the “daydreamy” aspect of SCT, rather than “sluggishness” per se, may be related to more complex, cognitively-demanding tasks with greater executive functioning burdens in BT survivors. Implications for intervention for oncology survivors as well as future research directions are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09297049.2021.1917529

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inattention, depression, anxiety, somatic complaints, excessive or reduced sleep, cognitive problems, and autism symptoms have been found uniquely associated with SCT as predictors.

    “Studies examining potential psychopathology correlates as predictors of SCT have found inattention, depression, anxiety, somatic complaints, excessive or reduced sleep, cognitive problems, and autism symptoms to be uniquely associated with SCT.62–64”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that inattentive ADHD symptoms were strongly associated with SCT subscales in pediatric brain-tumor survivors. The paper does not establish inattention as a unique predictor of SCT or report the claimed associations with depression, anxiety, somatic complaints, excessive or reduced sleep, cognitive problems, or autism symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, & Reid R (2016). ADHD rating Scale–IV for children and adolescents. Guilford Press.
  2. Wechsler D (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (Fourth ed.). Psychological Corp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, R. K., Jones, K., & Jacobson, L. A.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Rachel K.
Venue
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2021-04-18
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
960-972
ISSN
  • 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4136
OpenAlex
W3155688453
Cited by
14
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH111965)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, processing speed, pediatric brain tumor survivors, executive function, inattention, cancer treatment effects, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Cognition, Humans, Survivors, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review