Cited by 23Tryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and CortisolHealth disparities and outcomes

Inflammatory markers and incident depression: evidence in a population-based prospective study

Shi, Rong, Gwee, Xinyi, Chua, Denise QL, Tan, Crystal TY, Yap, Keng Bee, Larbi, Anis, Lu, Yanxia, Ng, Tze Pin·2022·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

The association between pro-inflammatory cytokines and depression is widely acknowledged. However, longitudinal data that show they lead to depression are few. In a community-based sample of older individuals (n = 2761, ages = 55-98 y) in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study (SLAS), we analyzed the associations between inflammatory markers (CRP, IL6, TNFα, and inflammation risk score) and depression (defined as the presence of depressive symptoms, depression history or treatment). Cross-sectional analysis showed that CRP, IL-6 and TNFα were significantly associated with depression at baseline. Longitudinal analysis controlling for a host of potentially confounding risk factors and initial depression revealed that IL-6, TNFα, and inflammation risk score were associated with elevated risk of depression at follow-ups. However, there was no significant association between CRP and subsequent depression after adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyles and inflammatory medical condition variables. In summary, this prospective study shows that inflammation predicts depression in older adults, and suggests that the heterogeneous findings among studies may be due to differences in study population characteristics, depression, inflammatory markers, and the extent of adjusting for confounders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105806

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with elevated inflammatory markers often show better outcomes with anti-inflammatory treatments and poorer responses to psychotherapy.

    “Patients with elevated inflammatory markers often show better outcomes with anti-inflammatory treatments and poorer responses to psychotherapy, supporting stratified therapeutic approaches (Shi et al., 2022; Jha et al., 2017; Orsolini et al., 2022; Pan et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, R., Gwee, X., Chua, D. Q., Tan, C. T., Yap, K. B., Larbi, A., Lu, Y., & Ng, T. P.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Lu, Yanxia
  • Ng, Tze Pin
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
142
Pages
105806
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281392218
Cited by
23
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
depression, inflammatory markers, inflammatory cytokines, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, TNF-α, older adults, incident depression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, C-Reactive Protein, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Humans, Inflammation, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review