Complex cell-state changes revealed by single cell RNA sequencing of 76,149 microglia throughout the mouse lifespan and in the injured brain
Open accessAbstract
Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, rapidly change states in response to their environment, but we lack molecular and functional signatures of different microglial populations. In this study, we analyzed the RNA expression patterns of more than 76,000 individual microglia during development, old age and after brain injury. Analysis uncovered at least nine transcriptionally distinct microglial states, which expressed unique sets of genes and were localized in the brain using specific markers. The greatest microglial heterogeneity was found at young ages; however, several states - including chemokine-enriched inflammatory microglia - persisted throughout the lifespan or increased in the aged brain. Multiple reactive microglial subtypes were also found following demyelinating injury in mice, at least one of which was also found in human MS lesions. These unique microglia signatures can be used to better understand microglia function and to identify and manipulate specific subpopulations in health and disease.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Single-cell RNA sequencing of 76,149 mouse microglia across development, aging, and demyelinating injury identifies at least nine transcriptionally distinct microglial states, with the greatest diversity early in development and state shifts in aging and injury. The study defines state-specific markers, validates several populations by in situ hybridization, and finds a Ccl4+ microglial subset in mouse lesions and human multiple sclerosis lesions.
Key findings
- Across all ages and conditions, clustering revealed nine unique microglial states, with cluster sizes ranging from 0.2% to 24% of all microglia; canonical microglial genes were not uniformly expressed, as only C1qa, Fcrls, and Trem2 were expressed in all clusters.
- Microglial diversity was greatest at E14.5 and P5 and lower at P30 and P100; aging and injury redistributed states, including increases in Clusters 8 and 9. In aged P540 versus P100 mice, there were 2–4 times more microglia in aging-enriched Clusters OA2 and OA3, with OA2 expressing inflammatory genes such as Ccl4, Ccl3, and Il1b and OA3 expressing interferon-response genes including Ifitm3, Rtp4, and Oasl2.
- In LPC-induced demyelination at 7 days post-lesion, injury-responsive Cluster IR2 was almost entirely composed of lesion microglia and subclustered into IR2.1–2.4; IR2.2 upregulated Cxcl10, and IR2.2/IR2.3 upregulated Ccl4. IRM shared a 12-gene core signature with disease-associated microglia (DAM), including Spp1, Lpl, and Apoe, but also had unique interferon-response genes.
- Sex had almost no effect on microglial diversity or cluster proportions across E14.5, P4/P5, and P100; the only observed difference was female enrichment of the small Cluster Sx6 (~0.5% of microglia, observed only at P4/P5, enriched for Cd74, Ccl24, and Arg1). In human MS lesions, approximately 30% of microglia in the lesion were Ccl4+.
Methods
- Microglia were FACS-purified from C57BL/6J mice at E14.5, P4/P5, P30, P100, and P540, plus adult P100 mice after focal LPC-induced demyelination at 7 days post-lesion; at least three to four biological replicates per age were collected, totaling 76,149 sequenced microglia from 41 animals.
- Cells were processed with a droplet-based RNA-seq approach (10× Genomics Chromium), sequenced to ~40,000–60,000 reads/cell, and analyzed using an independent component analysis (ICA)-based clustering pipeline, including subclustering and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) for comparison with published DAM data.
- Findings were validated with single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH), chromogenic in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry in mouse tissue, and with human MS tissue from the UK MS Tissue Bank; statistical analyses included ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc tests, t-tests, and gene-marker thresholds of >1.5 fold change and P < 1E-4 with Benjamini–Hochberg correction.
Limitations
- Stated: further analysis is needed to establish whether the identified states are transient or represent terminal differentiation; lineage tracing is needed to determine the origin of Cluster 6 microglia and whether they give rise to mature microglia; manipulation of aged inflammatory microglia is needed to test whether they contribute to age-related brain inflammation; the small female-enriched Cluster Sx6 requires further validation; and whether other mouse lesion-enriched genes translate to human microglia needs confirmation.
- Evident: the main dataset is mouse-based, and the injury analysis focuses on a single model (LPC-induced demyelination) at one time point (7 days post-lesion); human MS validation was limited to five control/patient samples and centered on Ccl4/Tmem119 staining.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Cluster 6 microglia also upregulate other Ms4a family members, including Ms4a6c, Ms4a6b, Ms4a6d, Tmem176a, and Tmem176b.
“In addition to Ms4a7, Cluster 6 microglia also expressed increased transcripts of other Ms4a family members including Ms4a6c, Ms4a6b, Ms4a6d, Tmem176a, and Tmem176b (Fig 2a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 6 microglia upregulate Ccr1.
“Cluster 6 microglia also upregulated chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1 (Ccr1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 marker genes Fabp5, Mif, Ldha, and Tpi1 are also upregulated, though less strongly, in P4/P5 Cluster 4 Spp1+ microglia.
“The top genes, including Fabp5, Mif, Ldha, and Tpi1, in Cluster 3 microglia were also upregulated in the Cluster 4 Spp1+ microglia found at P4/P5, albeit to a lower extent (Fig 4c, Fig S4b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At E14.5, about 10-15% of all microglia belong to Cluster 3.
“At E14.5, approximately 1015% of all microglia belonged to Cluster 3 (Fig 4b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ms4a6c is upregulated in microglia from injured tissue.
“Ms4a6c was also upregulated in microglia from the injured tissue (Fig 2c, Fig S4d)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The microglial states were localized in the brain using specific markers.
“and were localized in the brain using specific markers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At least one microglial subtype associated with demyelinating injury in mice is also present in human multiple sclerosis lesions.
“at least one of which was also found in human multiple sclerosis lesions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ms4a7+ microglia are most abundant at E14.5.
“Ms4a7+ microglia were most abundant at E14.5 (Fig 2e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
M-phase, S-phase, and G-phase pathways are enriched to different degrees in each proliferative subgroup.
“Indeed, pathway enrichment for M-phase, S-phase, and G-phase were represented to differing degrees in each subgroup (Fig S5a–c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Each of the transcriptionally distinct microglial states expressed a unique set of genes.
“which expressed unique sets of genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 microglia upregulate Mif, Ldha, and Tpi1.
“Cluster 3 microglia upregulate several other genes including macrophage migration inhibitory factor (Mif), lactate dehydrogenase A (Ldha), and triosephosphate isomerase 1 (Tpi1) (Fig 4a,c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Demyelinating injury in mice produces multiple reactive microglial subtypes.
“Multiple reactive microglial subtypes were also found following demyelinating injury in mice”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Several large microglial subpopulations in the embryonic and early postnatal brain express markers of metabolic activity, proliferation, growth, and motility.
“we uncovered several large microglial subpopulations in the embryonic and early postnatal brain that expressed markers associated with metabolic activity, cell proliferation, cell growth, and cell motility”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified genes that were strongly upregulated in or unique to specific microglial states.
“we also identified genes strongly upregulated in, if not completely unique to, specific microglial states (Fig 1f, Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aging and injury redistribute microglial states, increasing the proportion of cells in Clusters 8 and 9 relative to juveniles and adults.
“Both aging and injury caused a redistribution of microglial states, including an increase in the percent of cells occupying Clusters 8 and 9, as compared to juveniles and adults (Fig 1d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spp1+ microglia were located only in subcortical corpus callosum axon tracts and in distinct cerebellar axon tract clusters.
“smFISH for Spp1 showed that these cells only resided in the subcortical axon tracts of the corpus callosum in the forebrain, as well as in distinct clusters in the axon tracts of the cerebellum (Fig 3d–f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Metabolic pathways are upregulated in both Cluster 3 and Cluster 4 microglia.
“Metabolic pathways were also upregulated in both Clusters 3 and 4 (Fig S5d,e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ms4a7 expression in microglia is most concentrated at E14.5.
“Ms4a7 gene expression in microglia was most concentrated at E14.5 (Fig 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spp1 expression varied strikingly between neighboring microglia in these areas, with some cells high and adjacent cells undetectable.
“There was striking diversity of expression on a cell-to-cell basis in these areas, with some microglia expressing high transcript levels of Spp1 adjacent to neighbors that had no detectable Spp1 expression (Fig 3f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
smFISH quantification confirmed a decrease in Fabp5+Mif+ microglia from about 6% at E14.5 to less than 1% at P30.
“smFISH quantification confirmed the striking decrease in the number of Fabp5+Mif+ microglia between E14.5 and P30 (6% vs. <1% of all microglia) (Fig 4e,f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 microglia upregulate transcripts associated with glycolysis.
“Other upregulated transcripts in Cluster 3 microglia were associated with glycolysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 4 microglia also upregulate Igf1, Gpnmb, Lgals1, and Lgals3.
“Other upregulated genes included insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf1), glycoprotein (transmembrane) NMB (Gpnmb), and immunomodulators from the galectin family, galectin-1 (Lgals1) and galectin-3 (Lgals3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Juvenile and adult microglia were mostly assigned to three central clusters (7a-c) that lacked unique marker genes.
“Juvenile (P30) and adult (P100) microglia were largely assigned to three central clusters (Cluster 7a-c) that were not defined by any unique genes (Fig 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 microglia express increased levels of Spp1, Gpnmb, and Igf1.
“Conversely, Cluster 3 microglia also expressed increased levels of the Cluster 4 markers Spp1, Gpnmb, and Igf1 (Fig 3c, Fig S4c)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In developing-brain microglial clusters 3 and 4, P2ry12, Cx3cr1, and Tmem119 transcripts were much lower or absent.
“We found that P2ry12, Cx3cr1, and Tmem119 (not shown) transcripts were expressed at much lower levels or not at all in certain clusters of microglia from the developing brain (Clusters 3,4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 microglia are found almost exclusively at E14.5, with a small percentage at P4/P5.
“Cluster 3 microglia were found almost exclusively at E14.5, although a small percentage were also present at P4/P5 (Fig 4b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 microglia uniquely express Fabp5.
“The first subpopulation of microglia belong to Cluster 3 and uniquely express the gene Fabp5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Non-microglial macrophages and monocytes uniquely expressed F13a1, H2-Aa, Ccr2, Lyve1, and Mgl2, which microglia barely expressed.
“Non-microglial macrophages and monocytes uniquely expressed the genes coagulation factor XIII, A1 subunit (F13a1, macrophage), histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, alpha (H2-Aa, macrophage), chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 (Ccr2, monocyte), lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (Lyve1, macrophage), and macrophage galactose N-acetyl-galactosamine specific lectin 2 (Mgl2, macro”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The nine microglial clusters varied in size from 0.2% to 24% of all microglia.
“Cluster sizes ranged from 0.2% of all microglia to as many as 24% of all microglia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 4 microglia express Spp1 at very high transcript levels.
“These microglia expressed the gene secreted phosphoprotein 1 (Spp1), also known as osteopontin, at very high transcript levels (Fig 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mouse microglia across development, aging, and injury comprise at least nine transcriptionally distinct states.
“Our analysis uncovered at least nine transcriptionally distinct microglial states, which expressed unique sets of genes and were localized in the brain using specific markers.”
- Also stated in: another passage · plain
“Clustering analysis revealed nine unique microglial states across all ages and conditions, including injury (Fig 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: another passage · plain
- Findingown data
Microglial heterogeneity is greatest at young ages (E14.5 and P5) and lower in juveniles and adults.
“The greatest microglial heterogeneity was found at young ages”
- Also stated in: another passage · plain
“We found the greatest microglial diversity at the youngest ages (E14.5 and P5) and considerably less diversity in juveniles (P30) and adults (P100) (Fig 1d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: another passage · plain
- Findingown data
A microglial subpopulation enriched in aged mice is defined by Ccl4 expression (Cluster 8).
“One subpopulation that was highly concentrated in aged mice was defined by the gene chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 (Ccl4, Cluster 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Injury Responsive Cluster 1 consisted mainly of whole brain and saline-injected control microglia.
“Injury Responsive Cluster 1 (IR1) was composed mainly of whole brain and saline-injected control microglia”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
IRM uniquely upregulated interferon response genes, including Ifi27l2a and Cxcl10.
“IRM uniquely upregulated interferon response genes including Ifi27l2a and Cxcl10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ATM, IRM, and DAM share a common transcriptional signature of 12 core genes, including Spp1, Lpl, and Apoe.
“We found that all three groups shared a common transcriptional signature of 12 core genes including Spp1, Lpl, and Apoe (Fig S7b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
smFISH showed a large increase in Fcrls+ microglia throughout demyelinated tissue.
“A comparison of saline-injected controls and LPC-injected animals showed a large increase in the number of Fcrls+ microglia throughout the demyelinated tissue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster IR2-specific genes were upregulated to varying degrees among microglia.
“We found that Cluster IR2-specific genes were variably upregulated among the microglia (Fig 6d)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Male and female samples showed almost no difference in clustering by cell number per cluster or normalized cluster occupancy.
“We found almost no difference in the clustering between the male and female samples (Fig S6b–d), as measured by the number of cells per sample in each cluster (Fig S6c) and the normalized number of cells occupying each cluster (Fig S6d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After P30, only a few percent of microglia fall into proliferative clusters.
“By age P30 and onward, only a few percent of cells fell into these proliferative clusters (Fig 4h)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Subclustering of Cluster IR2 identified several small injury-responsive microglial subpopulations, IR2.1 to IR2.4.
“we performed a second level of clustering analysis, called subclustering, on only Cluster IR2 cells (Fig 6e) and found several small subpopulations of IRM (Clusters IR2.1-2.4, Fig 6e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster MC2.4 expressed high transcript levels of Spp1.
“and expressed high transcript levels of Spp1 (Fig S7h)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Microglia in Cluster IR2.2 upregulated the interferon response gene Cxcl10.
“Microglia from Cluster IR2.2 upregulated the interferon response gene Cxcl10 (Fig 6d,f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ccl4 staining was found in Tmem119+ cells.
“Ccl4 staining was found in Tmem119+ cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Injury Subclusters IR2.2 and IR2.3 specifically upregulated Ccl4.
“Two of the Injury Subclusters - IR2.2 and IR2.3 – specifically upregulated Ccl4 (Fig 6d,f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Aging enriched two microglial clusters (OA2 and OA3) and one monocyte/macrophage cluster expressing F13a1 and Mgl2.
“Two microglia clusters were identified as being enriched in aging mice (Aging Clusters (OA) 2 and 3), along with one monocyte and macrophage cluster (Mono/Mac), which expressed the macrophage-specific markers F13a1 and Mgl2 (Fig 1f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster OA2 microglia also upregulate Id2 and ATF3.
“Cluster OA2 microglia also upregulated expression of the transcriptional regulator DNA binding protein inhibitor 2 (Id2) and transcription factor activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) (Table S1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using canonical correlation analysis, DAM co-clustered with IRM in Microglia Comparison Cluster 2.
“Using this approach we found that DAM co-clustered with IRM in Microglia Comparison Cluster 2 (MC2) (Fig S7c,d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Subclustering of MC2 showed that DAM largely fell into Clusters MC2.1, MC2.4, and MC2.5.
“subclustering of Cluster MC2 revealed that DAM largely fell into Clusters MC2.1, MC2.4, and MC2.5 (Fig S7e,f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
OA2 microglia upregulate Lgals3, Cst7, Ccl4, Ccl3, and Il1b.
“They upregulated Lgals3, cystatin F (Cst7), chemokines Ccl4 and Ccl3, as well as the inflammatory cytokine interleukin 1 beta (Il1b) (Fig 5d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglia from whole brain, saline-injected, and LPC-injected conditions formed two major clusters.
“Analysis of microglia from these three conditions produced two major clusters (Fig 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster MC2.2 upregulated Cxcl10 and other interferon response genes.
“Cluster MC2.2 upregulated genes include Cxcl10 and other interferon response genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this dataset, microglia express Arg1 in vivo only in a very small subset of cells.
“we show in our dataset that microglia only express Arg1 in vivo in a very small subset of cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The only sex difference observed was enrichment of Cluster Sx6 in female samples.
“The only observed difference between the sexes was in Cluster Sx6, which was enriched in female samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Injury Subcluster 2.4 expressed cell proliferation markers, including Birc5.
“Injury Subcluster 2.4 expressed cell proliferation markers, including Birc5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster IR2 was almost entirely made up of microglia from LPC-injected demyelinated lesions.
“Cluster IR2 was almost entirely composed of microglia from LPC-injected demyelinated lesions (Fig 6c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster OA3 upregulates interferon-response genes including Ifitm3, Rtp4, and Oasl2.
“Cluster OA3 upregulated interferon-response genes including interferon induced transmembrane protein 3 (Ifitm3), receptor transporter protein 4 (Rtp4), and 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase-like 2 (Oasl2) (Fig 5d,e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ccl4+ cells formed patches within the lesions, similar to smFISH.
“which formed patches within the lesions, similarly to the smFISH analysis (Fig 7b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Each Injury Subcluster broadly upregulated Cluster IR2 genes, including Apoe.
“each Injury Subcluster broadly upregulated Cluster IR2 genes, including Apoe (Fig 6f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein staining showed an increase in the number of Ccl4+ cells.
“We also found an increase in the number of Ccl4+ cells (Fig 7d)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
smFISH showed that Ccl4 and Cxcl10 were confined to small patches within the larger lesion.
“smFISH showed that two of the selectively responsive genes – Ccl4 and Cxcl10 – were confined to small patches within the larger lesion (Fig 7b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Microglia in these states make up only a small proportion of all microglia.
“Even with the shift, the number of microglia that occupy these states form only a small fraction of microglia”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster MC2.2 contained almost no DAM.
“and contained almost no DAM (Fig S7f,g).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
IRM were evenly distributed across all five MC2 subclusters.
“IRM, however, were evenly distributed between all five subclusters (Fig S7f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, microglial diversity was largely unaffected by sex during normal development.
“overall these results showed that microglial diversity was largely unaffected by sex during normal development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aging causes a shift toward a more immunogenic profile, with more inflammatory and interferon-responsive microglia.
“Altogether, our data show that aging triggers a shift towards a more immunogenic profile including an increase in inflammatory microglia and interferon-responsive microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ATM uniquely upregulated developmental genes, including Gpnmb and Fabp5.
“ATM uniquely upregulated genes found in development, including Gpnmb and Fabp5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Each of ATM, IRM, and DAM also expressed unique genes.
“However, each group also expressed a number of unique genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Injury slightly upregulates some markers from proliferative clusters and Cluster 3.
“in response to injury, some markers from both the proliferative clusters as well as the metabolically active cluster (Cluster 3) were slightly upregulated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster MC2.4 was equally represented by IRM and DAM.
“Cluster 2.4 was equally represented by IRM and DAM”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
OA2 microglia express inflammatory signals not normally expressed by other microglial populations in vivo.
“The OA2 microglia expressed a number of inflammatory signals which were not normally expressed by other populations of microglia in vivo (Fig 5d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fcrls+Ccl4+ cells were found throughout the adult and aged brain.
“we performed smFISH and chromogenic ISH for Ccl4 and Fcrls on P30 and P540 brain sections and found evidence of Fcrls+Ccl4+ cells throughout the adult and aged brain (Fig 5f,g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-staining showed Ccl4 was upregulated in the core of active MS lesions compared with unaffected white matter in control patients.
“Co-staining with human anti-Ccl4 antibody showed that Ccl4 was upregulated in the core of active lesions, compared to unaffected white matter in control patients (Fig 7f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
P540 samples had 2-4 times more microglia in Clusters OA2 and OA3 than P100 controls.
“There were 2-4 times more microglia in Clusters OA2 and OA3 from the P540 samples versus P100 controls (Fig 5b,c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ccl4 and Cxcl10 colocalized with Fcrls in many, but not all, cases.
“Both markers colocalized with Fcrls in many, but not all cases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Protein staining showed a large increase in Tmem119+ microglia in the lesion core compared with saline-injected controls.
“We found a large increase in the number of Tmem119+ microglia in the core of the lesion, as compared to saline-injected controls (Fig 7d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Injury-responsive microglia in Cluster IR2 had reduced expression of P2ry12 and Cx3cr1.
“Injury responsive microglia (IRM) in Cluster IR2 had downregulated expression of the canonical microglial markers P2ry12 and Cx3cr1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Salter and Stevens, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
smFISH showed broad upregulation of Apoe in microglia.
“as well as a broad upregulation of Apoe in microglia (Fig 7a), which supports our sequencing data (Fig 6d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cell proliferation genes are upregulated to a smaller extent in Cluster 3 Fabp5+Mif+ microglia.
“The same is true for the cell proliferation genes, which were upregulated to a smaller extent in the Cluster 3 Fabp5+Mif+ microglia (Fig 4c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
IRM also uniquely upregulated Ifi204.
“They also uniquely upregulate interferon inducible protein 204 (Ifi204)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this dataset, the interferon-response profile is restricted to a small subset of microglia.
“but our findings indicate that this profile is actually restricted to a small subset of microglia (Fig 5a,c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Very few Ccl4+Fcrls+ and Cxcl10+Fcrls+ cells were found in saline-injected controls compared with LPC-injected lesions.
“Very few Ccl4+Fcrls+ and Cxcl10+Fcrls+ cells were found in saline-injected controls compared to LPC-injected lesions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These Cluster 6 genes are also enriched in brain border macrophages.
“which are also enriched in brain border macrophages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both groups upregulated similar genes, including Apoe, Lpl, and Spp1.
“Both groups of cells upregulated similar genes including Apoe, Lpl, and Spp1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Microglial diversity is highest during early development, when microglia are still differentiating.
“We found that microglial diversity is highest during early development, when microglia are still differentiating (Matcovitch-Natan et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matcovitch-Natan et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Ccl4+ cells were also found in blood vessels in control and MS samples.
“Ccl4+ cells were also found in blood vessels in control and MS samples (as seen at the bottom of the MS lesion image, Fig 7f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately 30% of microglia in the lesion were Ccl4+.
“In total, approximately 30% of microglia in the lesion were Ccl4+ (Fig 7g).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The percentage of Ccl4+ cells away from active lesions was comparable to control patient tissue.
“The percentage of Ccl4+ cells away from the active lesions was comparable to that seen in control patient tissue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
These cells had a distinct metabolic signature.
“Furthermore, these cells had a distinct metabolic signature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Previous bulk RNA-seq signatures for cell cycle, phagocytosis, and surveillance correspond to only three of the nine states presented here.
“These signatures - cell cycle, phagocytosis, and surveillance - correspond with only three of the nine states presented here (Matcovitch-Natan et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matcovitch-Natan et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The greatest similarity in cell state was between P5 Cluster 6 microglia and microglia in the demyelinated lesion.
“The greatest similarity in cell state was found between P5 Cluster 6 microglia and microglia in the demyelinated lesion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A subset of microglia selectively express Ccl4.
“A major finding in our study was the identification of a subset of microglia that selectively express the chemokine Ccl4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clusters 2 and 3 had considerable transcriptional overlap.
“Clusters 2 and 3 had considerable transcriptional overlap”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cluster 6 microglia represent an intermediate state between brain border macrophages and mature microglia.
“suggesting an intermediate state (Fig 2g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Each microglial state reflected a specific and definable transcriptional program, rather than a simple modulation of commonly expressed microglial genes.
“These unique gene expression patterns showed that each microglial state reflected a specific and definable transcriptional program, rather than a simple modulation of commonly expressed microglial genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These subpopulations could underlie the brain colonization process.
“that could underlie the brain colonization process (Fig 4, Fig S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Spp1+ microglial population is highly concentrated in the axon tracts of the pre-myelinated brain.
“In conclusion, this Spp1+ microglia population is highly concentrated specifically in the axon tracts of the pre-myelinated brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cluster 3 microglia have an altered metabolic profile.
“suggesting an altered metabolic profile in these cells (Fig S5d)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The proliferative clusters likely represent microglia at different stages of the cell cycle.
“because it is likely that each of the proliferative clusters represent microglia at different stages of the cell cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
ATM might engulf material in these regions.
“Their amoeboid morphology and their enrichment of genes associated with immune cell activation, lysosomal activity, and phagocytosis (Table S1, Fig S5e) suggest that ATM might engulf material in these regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The restricted tempo-spatial appearance of ATM suggests that their activity is highly regulated.
“their restricted tempo-spatial appearance suggests that their activity is highly regulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The small percentage of Ms4a7+ cells at P30 likely represents perivascular macrophages.
“the small percentage of Ms4a7+ cells at P30 likely represent perivascular macrophages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ms4a-related pathways may become reactivated in pathology.
“suggesting that these pathways might become reactivated in pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ifi204 could act as an upstream regulator of the IRM response to injury.
“a transcription factor which could act as an upstream regulator of the IRM response to injury.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These cells may flexibly enter and exit a proliferative state.
“which could indicate that these cells flexibly enter and exit a proliferative state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These two subpopulations of embryonic and early postnatal microglia likely play essential roles in controlling how microglia populate the brain.
“Together, these two subpopulations of embryonic and early postnatal microglia likely play essential roles in controlling how microglia populate the brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Microglia have a dynamic role in physiological and injury-induced remyelination.
“microglia play a dynamic role in physiological and injury-induced remyelination (Miron et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miron et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Cluster OA3 microglia may contribute to the inflammatory tone of the aged brain.
“so it is plausible that Cluster OA3 microglia also play a role in contributing to the inflammatory tone of the aged brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baruch et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Most microglia are unchanged or only mildly changed by aging.
“suggesting that the vast majority of microglia are unaltered or only slightly altered by aging”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ccl4 is upregulated in the brains of MS patients.
“Ccl4 is upregulated in the brains of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients (Szczucinski and Losy, 2007)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szczucinski and Losy, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Subpopulations exist within Cluster IR2.
“suggesting the existence of subpopulations within the cluster”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The sex-comparison clustering recognized all the same clusters as the larger analysis.
“We were able to recognize all of the same clusters that were identified in the larger analysis in Figure 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Developmental pathways may be reactivated after injury.
“suggesting possible reactivation of developmental pathways (Fig S3a,b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Detection of localized populations of microglia expressing interferon-response genes may assist in identifying foci of neuronal injury or degeneration.
“Therefore, the detection of localized populations of microglia expressing interferon-response genes may assist in identifying foci of neuronal injury or degeneration (Mathys et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mathys et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Microglia divide at an extremely low rate at older ages.
“suggesting that microglia divide at an extremely low rate at older ages, an assertion supported by recent publications (Fuger et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fuger et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LPC-induced demyelination reproduces many features of demyelinated lesions in MS patients.
“LPC-induced demyelination is frequently used to study myelin repair and recapitulates many aspects of the demyelinated lesions found in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (Hammond et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hammond et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Local cues such as blood-brain barrier compromise or microinfarcts could drive microglial state changes instead of a brain-wide shift.
“local cues like blood brain barrier compromise (Montagne et al., 2015) or microinfarcts (Smith et al., 2012) could drive state changes rather than a brain-wide shift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Activated microglia can respond in diverse ways to different pathological conditions.
“Together, these results suggest that activated microglia can respond in a diverse way to underlying pathological conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Virtually all subpopulations were validated using smFISH and antibody staining.
“we validated virtually all of the subpopulations using smFISH and antibody staining”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The new cluster definitions reveal greater developmental complexity than was apparent from bulk sequencing.
“our new cluster definitions highlight the greater degree of developmental complexity that were covered up by dominating signatures in bulk sequencing experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matcovitch-Natan et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The temporally and spatially restricted nature of these cells suggests extrinsic forces shape this state.
“The temporally and spatially restricted nature of these cells suggests extrinsic forces shape this state”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These markers may be elements of a common activation pathway, since they are also upregulated in microglia surrounding plaques in an Alzheimer's disease model.
“These markers may comprise elements of a common activation pathway, since these genes are also upregulated in microglia that surround plaques in an Alzheimer’s disease model (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Cell clustering accurately represented the different microglial subpopulations in vivo.
“Our cell clustering accurately represented the different microglial subpopulations in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Detection of these cells in tissue using a different technique confirmed that cell isolation did not cause transcriptional artifacts.
“our detection of these cells in tissue using a different technique confirmed that the isolation of cells did not cause transcriptional artifacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These studies point to an important developmental role for these cells.
“These studies point to an important developmental role for these cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Microglia transition in and out of both states.
“suggesting that microglia transition in and out of both states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Microglia are an attractive target for biomarker development and monitoring clinical progression because they can sensitively respond to brain changes before physical symptoms.
“Microglia are an especially attractive target for biomarker development and to monitor clinical progression because they can sensitively respond to changes in the brain that emerge before physical symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Specific microglial subpopulations are similarly represented in mouse lesions and MS white matter lesions.
“These results suggest that specific subpopulations of microglia are similarly represented in mouse lesions and MS white matter lesions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This specific microglial subset is only present in the lesion.
“suggesting this specific subset of microglia is only present in the lesion (Fig 7g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Microglial activation is a dynamic response involving transcriptionally and spatially distinct subpopulations.
“Altogether, these results suggest that microglia ‘activation’ is a dynamic response involving transcriptionally and spatially distinct subpopulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These subpopulations are the predominant source of Ccl4 in MS lesions.
“and that they are the predominant source of Ccl4 in MS lesions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 65
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMs4a7+ microglia were sparsely distributed throughout the embryonic brain, and Ms4a7+ macrophages were present at brain borders.
“Ms4a7+ microglia were sparsely distributed throughout the embryonic brain (Fig 2d,f), with a population of Ms4a7+ macrophages at the brain borders (not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFabp5+Mif+ microglia were distributed throughout the E14.5 brain and often formed small clusters.
“Fabp5+Mif+ microglia were distributed throughout the E14.5 brain and often formed small clusters (Fig 4d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProliferative cluster markers were comparable in magnitude at E14.5 and P4/P5 and highly specific to those clusters.
“Markers for each of the proliferative populations were comparable in magnitude at E14.5 and P4/P5 and were highly specific to the proliferative clusters (Fig 4i, Fig S4a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 2a markers include Mcm6, Pcna, and Rrm2; 2b markers include Ube2c, Birc5, and H2afx; 2c markers include Hist1h2bc, Ccnb2, and Cenpa.
“The top cluster markers for Cluster 2a were minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (Mcm6), proliferating nuclear cell antigen (Pcna), and Rrm2. For Cluster 2b, they were Ube2c, baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 5 (Birc5), and H2A histone family, member X (H2afx), and for Cluster 2c they were histone cluster 1, H2bc (Hist1h2bc), cyclin B2 (Ccnb2), and Cenpa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 9 consists mainly of microglia from focal white matter injury and shows increased Ifi27l2a expression.
“Cluster 9 was composed predominantly of microglia from the focal white matter injury and had increased expression of the gene interferon, alpha-inducible protein 27 like protein 2A (Ifi27l2a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA major microglial state, Cluster 4, appears at P4/P5 and is barely present at other time points.
“At P4/P5, we found one major microglial state (Cluster 4) that was barely found at any other time point (Fig 3a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe axon tracts containing ATM later become heavily myelinated, but ATM largely disappear before myelination.
“The axon tracts where ATM were concentrated will eventually become heavily myelinated, but ATM are largely gone before myelination occurs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt E14.5, proliferative clusters 2a-2c together make up about 40% of microglia, and at P5 about 35%.
“At E14.5, the most populous microglial states were proliferative (Clusters 2a,2b,2c) and comprised a total of approximately 40% of all E14.5 microglia and 35% of P5 microglia (Fig 4g,h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome microglial states, including chemokine-enriched inflammatory microglia, persist throughout life or increase in the aged brain.
“several states – including chemokine-enriched inflammatory microglia – persisted throughout the lifespan or increased in the aged brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 6 microglia are predominantly from E14.5, comprising about 10% of E14.5 microglia and no more than 3% at other ages.
“Cluster 6 microglia were predominantly from E14.5 versus any other age or condition analyzed, as approximately 10% of all E14.5 microglia (but no more than 3% of microglia at any other age) fall into Cluster 6 (Fig 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost microglia expressed the canonical genes Fcrls, P2ry12, Cx3cr1, Trem2, and C1qa, but only C1qa, Fcrls, and Trem2 were uniformly expressed across all clusters.
“Gene expression analysis showed that the canonical microglial genes (Fcrls, P2ry12, Cx3cr1, Trem2, and C1qa) were highly expressed by most of the analyzed cells, but only three (C1qa, Fcrls, Trem2) were uniformly expressed in all clusters (Fig 1e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome microglial clusters were dominated by cells from specific ages, while others contained cells from multiple ages.
“Some clusters were dominated by microglia from specific ages, whereas others contained microglia from several ages”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNon-microglial monocytes and macrophages constituted 0-3% of cells and were retained in clustering as a reference.
“A small percentage (0-3%) of non-microglial monocytes and macrophage populations were also found (Cd45high cells) but were left in the clustering analysis to provide a point of reference for comparison with the various microglial states (Fig 1b,g, Mono/Mac cluster).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 4 microglia have an amoeboid morphology and upregulate the lysosomal markers Lamp1 and Cd68.
“These cells, which assume an amoeboid morphology (data not shown), also upregulate the lysosomal markers lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (Lamp1) and Cd68 (Table S1, Fig S5e)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt E14.5, a distinct microglial subpopulation (Cluster 6) uniquely expresses Ms4a7 and transcriptionally resembles brain border macrophages.
“At E14.5, we identified a distinct subpopulation of microglia that uniquely express Ms4a7 and share a similar transcriptional profile with brain border macrophages (Fig 2, Cluster 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Fabp5+Mif+ microglial population is found almost exclusively in the embryonic brain and is not restricted to a particular brain region.
“Together, these data show that this unique population of Fabp5+Mif+ microglia was found almost exclusively in the embryonic brain and were not restricted to a particular brain region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 8 cells occur at most ages in smaller numbers and peak developmentally at P5.
“Cluster 8 cells were found at most ages, albeit in smaller numbers, with a developmental peak at P5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAging did not add or remove microglial clusters but progressively expanded clusters that are rare in adolescent and adult samples.
“Aging did not lead to the appearance or disappearance of any clusters, but rather caused a progressive expansion of clusters that typically have few very cells in adolescent and adult samples (P30 and P100, Fig 1d) (Fig 5a–c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster Sx6 is the smallest microglial cluster (~0.5%), appears only at P4/P5, and is enriched for Cd74, Ccl24, and Arg1.
“Cluster Sx6 is the smallest identified microglial cluster (~0.5% of microglia), was observed only at P4/P5 (Fig S6c–d, Fig 1d), and was enriched for the genes Cd74, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 24 (Ccl24), and Arg1 (Fig S6e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMC2.1, MC2.4, and MC2.5 represented P2ry12-high, Spp1-high, and Ccl4-high microglia, respectively.
“These clusters represented P2ry12high (MC2.1, data not shown), Spp1high (MC2.4, Fig S7h), and Ccl4high (MC2.5, data not shown) microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChromogenic ISH showed a significant increase in Ccl4+Fcrls+ cells in P540 brains, with no significant regional distribution differences.
“we used chromogenic ISH and found a significant upregulation of doublepositive cells in P540 brains (Fig 5h), however no significant differences in regional distribution were found.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCcl4+Fcrls+ microglia were distributed among other microglia and were otherwise indistinguishable.
“Ccl4+Fcrls+ microglia were distributed amongst the other microglia but were otherwise indistinguishable (Fig 5f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMale microglia uniquely expressed Eif2s3y, and female microglia expressed Xist.
“microglia from males uniquely expressed the Y chromosome gene Eif2s3y and microglia from females expressed the X inactivation gene Xist (Fig S6f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCcl4+ microglia are rare in the healthy developing brain, peak slightly at P5, and increase substantially in P540 brain.
“There were very few Ccl4+ microglia in the healthy developing brain, with a small developmental peak at P5 but a large increase in the percentage of these cells was found in the P540 brain (Fig 1d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA portion of Cluster 3 microglia cluster with proliferative microglia and are enriched for degradation pathways for proliferation mediators.
“a portion of the Cluster 3 microglia physically cluster with the proliferative microglia (Fig 1b) and were also enriched for degradation pathways for mediators of proliferation (Fig S5d)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBirc5 is also expressed by proliferative microglia during early brain development.
“a gene also expressed by proliferative microglia during early brain development (Fig 4g)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClusters 2 and 3 share some transcriptional overlap, with Mif, Ldha, and Tpi1 also expressed at lower levels in proliferative microglia.
“The top cluster markers in Clusters 2 and 3 also shared some transcriptional overlap. For example, Mif, Ldha, and Tpi1 were also expressed by proliferative microglia but to a lesser degree (Fig 4c,i).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt least 9 microglial subpopulations were defined, with unique transcriptional and spatial signatures.
“We defined at least 9 subpopulations of microglia and provide unique transcriptional and spatial signatures that give us hints about their possible functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese microglia are present in small numbers during development and expand in aging and injury.
“These microglia are present in small numbers during development and expand in two different contexts: aging and injury.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA unique microglial state, Cluster 6, was enriched at E14.5 and defined by Ms4a7, Ccr1, and Mrc1.
“Here, we identified a unique microglial state (Cluster 6) that was enriched at E14.5 and defined by the genes Ms4a7, Ccr1, and Mrc1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInjury-responsive microglia upregulated other pathways found in developmental subpopulations, including proliferation (Birc5), metabolic activity (Mif), and Ms4a family (Ms4a6c) markers.
“we also found that injury-responsive microglia upregulated other pathways found in developmental subpopulations including markers of proliferation (Birc5), metabolic activity (Cluster 3 microglia [Mif]), and those belonging to the Ms4a family (Ms4a6c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicroglia responding to injury re-express developmental markers, but their transcriptional states do not completely overlap.
“We found that microglia responding to injury do re-express developmental markers, but their transcriptional states do not completely overlap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther early developmental microglial states were enriched for metabolism, growth, motility, and proliferation pathways and were scattered throughout the brain.
“Other key microglial states in early development were enriched for pathways associated with cell metabolism, growth, motility (Cluster 3) and proliferation (Clusters 2a-c) and were scattered throughout the brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe only microglia enriched for inflammatory signals are in Cluster 8/Cluster OA2/Cluster IR2.2 and IR2.3 and express Ccl3, Ccl2, Ccl7, Ccl9, Ccl12, Il1b, and Tnf.
“we found that the only microglia enriched for inflammatory signals are in Cluster 8/Cluster OA2/Cluster IR2.2, IR2.3 and express Ccl3, Ccl2, Ccl7, Ccl9, Ccl12, Il1b and Tnf.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCcl4 staining was predominantly in Tmem119+ microglia, although a small percentage of Ccl4+/Iba1+ amoeboid immune cells were also observed.
“Ccl4 staining was found predominantly in Tmem119+ microglia, although a small percentage of Ccl4+/Iba1+ amoeboid immune cells were also observed (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 4 was restricted to unmyelinated axon tracts at P4/P5 and had a highly activated profile.
“The other microglial subpopulation in the developing brain, Cluster 4, was restricted to unmyelinated axon tracts at P4/P5 and assumed a highly activated profile”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataClusters 3 and 4 have an overlapping transcriptional signature and possible relationship.
“suggesting an overlapping transcriptional signature and possible relationship between the two states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationBatch and replicate effects were removed from the clustering analysis by excluding independent components that captured them.
“For both rounds of analysis, independent components that captured batch or replicate effects were removed before clustering analysis (Fig S2d), as previously described (Saunders et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saunders et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese data demonstrate that microglia exist in multiple definable states that change over development, aging, and injury.
“Together, these data demonstrate that microglia exist in multiple definable states that change over the course of development, aging, and injury.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCluster 6 microglia reside in the embryonic brain parenchyma and bear considerable transcriptional overlap with brain border macrophages.
“Altogether, these results identify Cluster 6 microglia as a subpopulation that reside in the embryonic brain parenchyma and bears considerable transcriptional overlap with brain border macrophages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSome microglial states are present across development while others are more transitional.
“indicating that some microglial states are present across development while others are more transitional (Fig 1c,d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataExisting tools and marker definitions may need to be updated.
“suggesting that existing tools and marker definitions may need to be updated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPercoll purification did not alter the microglial subpopulations recovered, with only a slight shift in the relative percentage of one of the nine clusters.
“To ensure this step did not affect our recovery of microglial subpopulations, we Percoll purified microglia at P5, when we see considerable microglial diversity, and compared these microglia to those isolated without Percoll – finding no change in the subpopulations present and only a slight shift in the relative percentages of microglia in one of the nine clusters (Fig S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese data provide a comprehensive map of microglial state changes and identify genes that define several specific microglial states.
“these data provide a comprehensive map of these changes and identify genes that define several of these specific microglial states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe dataset includes at least three to four biological replicates per age, totaling 76,149 microglia from 41 animals.
“at least three to four biological replicates per age were collected for a total of 76,149 sequenced microglia from 41 total animals (Fig 1b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSequencing depth and median UMI and gene counts were comparable across all ages and conditions.
“Cells were sequenced to comparable sequencing depths (~40,000–60,000 reads/cell), and had a similar median unique molecular identifier (UMI) count and median gene number in all ages and conditions (Fig S2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown datasmFISH quantification closely matched the sequencing percentages and confirmed the presence of Ms4a7+ microglia in the developing brain.
“These differences found by smFISH closely mimic the percentages of Ms4a7+ microglia found in our sequencing data and confirm that these cells are present in the developing brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFcrls was uniformly expressed by all microglia in every cluster and was used as a microglial marker.
“Microglia were marked by Fcrls, which was uniformly expressed by all microglia in every cluster (Fig 2d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe widespread distribution of both proliferative and metabolically active microglia suggests that both cell subtypes give rise to mature microglia in the adult brain.
“The widespread distribution of both proliferative and metabolically active microglia suggests that both cell subtypes give rise to mature microglia in the adult brain, but lineage tracing studies will be needed to track their progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMicroglial activation is a tailored response involving both generalized and selective transcriptional programs.
“These results suggest that microglial activation is a tailored response in which microglia activate both generalized and selective transcriptional programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationreasoningThis small subpopulation of microglia contributes to age-related brain inflammation.
“suggests that this small subpopulation of microglia contributes to age-related brain inflammation; however manipulation of these microglia will be essential for testing this hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Franceschi et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuman Tmem119 expression is maintained by resident microglia in MS lesions and is not expressed by infiltrating immune cells.
“since its expression is maintained by resident human microglia in MS lesions and is not expressed by infiltrating immune cells (Zrzavy et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zrzavy et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThis quantification supports the sequencing data and shows an increase in the number of Cluster OA2 microglia with aging.
“This quantification supports our sequencing data and shows an increase in the number of Cluster OA2 microglia with aging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese effects were in response to demyelination and not a consequence of injection.
“suggesting that these effects were in response to demyelination and were not a consequence of the injection (Fig 7c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningCcl4 staining was perinuclear, most likely in the Golgi.
“and was perinuclear, most likely in the Golgi, where cytokines are often packaged into vesicles for release.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDisease Associated Microglia were recently identified in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.
“Another major class of activated microglia called Disease Associated Microglia (DAM) were recently identified in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (5xFAD) (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDemyelinated mouse lesions and human MS tissue trigger diverse microglial activation responses.
“Diverse microglial activation responses are triggered in demyelinated mouse lesions and human MS tissue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe sex-comparison analysis clustered 49,445 cells across ages and sexes.
“A total of 49,445 cells were clustered together across all the ages and sexes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataOther cells might also upregulate these pathways.
“suggesting other cells might also upregulate these pathways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor chromogenic in situ quantification, sample and probe identities were concealed from the researcher, who counted cells under blinded conditions.
“The images were coded to obscure the identity of each sample as well as the probes used. A blinded researcher used the manual counting feature in ImageJ to count cells labeled with green substrate (Ccl4+) or co-labeled with green and red substrate (Ccl4+Fcrls+).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMicroglia assume many distinctive states that change over time.
“Our results suggest that microglia assume many distinctive states that change over time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRe-expression of these markers could be an integral part of the activation process and might be necessary to stimulate a quick response to pathology.
“Re-expression of these markers could be an integral part of the activation process and might be necessary to stimulate a quick response to pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlocking TGF-beta signaling has no major effect on microglial cell number but causes a drastic gene-expression shift, including widespread upregulation of genes found in Cluster 6 and brain border macrophages, including Mrc1.
“blocking TGF-beta signaling (which helps to confer microglia identity, (Butovsky et al., 2014)) has no major effect on microglia cell number, but causes a drastic shift in their gene expression including widespread upregulation of (or failure to downregulate) genes found in Cluster 6 microglia and in brain border macrophages, including Mrc1 (Wong et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMicroglia become activated and aberrantly remove synapses in early stages of pathology in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease, well before cognitive decline and plaque formation.
“microglia become activated and aberrantly remove synapses in the early stages of pathology in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease, well before cognitive decline and plaque formation (Hong et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hong et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIdentification of robust markers for different microglia states in disease will allow development of tools to more specifically track and visualize microglial activation, inflammation, and disease progression.
“identification of robust markers for different microglia states in disease will allow for the development of tools to more specifically track and visualize microglial activation, inflammation, and disease progression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMarkers of these unique and potentially pathogenic microglia could be used as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.
“which could mean that markers of these unique – and potentially pathogenic – microglia could be used as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvidence of aberrant microglial activation has been found in many neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases, but the diversity and specificity of these responses need further exploration.
“evidence of aberrant microglia activation has been found in many forms of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disease, but the diversity of these responses and specificity of the microglia response to each disease needs further exploration (Salter and Stevens, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salter and Stevens, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPathway enrichment analysis used hypergeometric testing with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing.
“Pathway analysis was performed using Hypergeometric testing and a Benjamini Hochberg correction for multiple testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIndependent components linked to batch or sample replicate were excluded before clustering the remaining cells.
“ICs corresponding to batch or replicate effects were removed from analysis, and the cells were then clustered based on their values for the remaining ICs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenHuman MS brain tissue was obtained through a UK prospective donor scheme with full ethical approval from the UK MS Tissue Bank.
“Brain tissue was obtained through a UK prospective donor scheme with full ethical approval from the UK Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Tissue Bank (MREC/02/2/39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent PET imaging ligands, including TSPO, are not selective for microglia and are better markers of neuroinflammation.
“Current PET imaging ligands, including TSPO, are not selective for microglia and are better markers of neuroinflammation (Politis et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Politis et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAn ACD 3-plex negative control probe was used on one section per slide to confirm signal specificity.
“Additionally, the ACD 3-plex negative control probe was used on one section per slide to confirm signal specificity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSpectral gating was performed on the LSM 710 microscope to narrow emission spectra for Alexa 488 and Atto 550 dyes and minimize autofluorescence.
“We performed spectral gating on the LSM 710 microscope to narrow the collected emission spectra for the Alexa 488 and Atto 550 dyes and to minimize the autofluorescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese microglia could also arise from ontologically distinct progenitors.
“These microglia could also arise from ontologically distinct progenitors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent transplantation experiments suggest that Ms4a7 and other Cluster 6 markers are specific to hematopoietic-derived cells rather than yolk-sac progenitors.
“recent transplantation experiments suggest that Ms4a7 and other markers in Cluster 6 are specific to hematopoietic derived cells versus those derived from yolk-sac progenitors (Bennett et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Ccl4 antibody's specificity was verified using secondary-antibody-only controls and preadsorption with recombinant Ccl4 protein, following a previously described method.
“Ccl4 antibody specificity was tested using secondary antibody only controls as well as with antibody preadsorption using recombinant Ccl4 protein, as previously described (Sekar et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sekar et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal experiments were reviewed and overseen by the institutional animal use and care committee at Boston Children's Hospital in accordance with NIH guidelines.
“All experiments were reviewed and overseen by the institutional animal use and care committee at Boston Children’s Hospital in accordance with all NIH guidelines for the humane treatment of animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese microglial states can be defined by unique markers and localized within the brain.
“states that can be defined by unique markers and localized within the brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnother group showed that these microglia were the predominant source of Igf1 in the early postnatal brain, and Igf1 conditional knockout in microglia affected developing cortical neuron health at the same age.
“Another group showed that these microglia were the predominant source of Igf1 in the early postnatal brain, and Igf1 conditional knockout in microglia affected the health of developing cortical neurons at the same age (Ueno et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ueno et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMetabolic state is directly manipulated by cytokine and pattern-recognition receptors, and elevated glycolytic activity has been linked to immune cell activation.
“Metabolic state is directly manipulated by cytokine and pattern-recognition receptors, and elevated glycolytic activity has been tied to immune cell activation (Everts et al., 2014; O’Neill and Pearce, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Everts et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O’Neill and Pearce, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLipofuscin accumulates in the aged brain and causes autofluorescence, which motivated using chromogenic RNAscope detection for 18-month-old mice.
“The RNAscope® 2.5 HD Duplex Detection Kit (Chromogenic) was used in experiments involving 18 month-old mice to avoid autofluorescence from lipofuscin accumulation in the aged brain (Xu et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany signals expressed in this subpopulation can be highly damaging to the brain; Il1b and Tnf can cause neurotoxicity, and chemokines can attract infiltrating immune cells that exacerbate pathology.
“Many of the signals expressed in this subpopulation can be highly damaging to the brain. For example, Il1b and Tnf can both cause neurotoxicity (Takeuchi et al., 2006; Ye et al., 2013), and infiltrating immune cells attracted by the chemokines expressed in the Ccl4+ subpopulation can exacerbate pathology (Gadani et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA negative control probe (ACD 2-plex) was included on one section per slide in the chromogenic in situ experiments.
“The ACD 2-plex negative control probe was used on one section per slide for control purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenCluster-defining genes had to exceed a 1.5-fold change and a P value below 1E-4, and were adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction.
“Genes that define each cluster of microglia exceed a minimum threshold of 1.5 fold change and a P-value less than 1E-4 and were adjusted using Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis small subpopulation may be a specialized group uniquely primed to produce an inflammatory response.
“it is possible that they are a specialized group uniquely primed to produce an inflammatory response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese parenchymal microglia could be microglia that have not fully differentiated.
“These microglia, which were present in the brain parenchyma, could be microglia that have yet to fully differentiate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Microglia rapidly change states in response to their environment.
“Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, rapidly change states in response to their environment”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of molecular and functional signatures of different microglial populations.
“but we lack molecular and functional signatures of different microglial populations”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microglia have historically been characterized as resting, M1, or M2 based on simple in vitro stimulation methods.
“microglia have historically been characterized as ‘resting’, ‘M1’ (proinflammatory), or ‘M2’ (anti-inflammatory) - based on simple in vitro stimulation methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is still unclear when microglia diverge from brain border neighbors and how quickly they differentiate.
“However, it is still unclear when microglia diverge from their brain border neighbors and how quickly they differentiate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not until microglia infiltrate the brain parenchyma and are exposed to brain-derived signals that they achieve their unique identity.
“It is not until microglia infiltrate the brain parenchyma and are exposed to brain-derived signals that they achieve their unique identity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The extent of the microglial response to aging has not been comprehensively studied, and it remains unclear how, where, and to what extent microglia change with normal aging.
“However, the extent of the microglial response to aging has not been comprehensively studied, and it remains unclear how, where (in the brain), and to what extent microglia change with normal aging.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is unclear whether microglia tailor their responses to specific injury types or whether distinct microglial populations exist in pathological tissue.
“However, it is still unclear whether or how microglia tailor their response to specific injury types or whether distinct populations of microglia exist in pathological tissue, as we lack both the markers and tools to identify and characterize different activation states, should they exist.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microglia respond robustly and rapidly to demyelination in the LPC model.
“third, microglia respond robustly and rapidly to demyelination in this model”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microglial activation is largely confined to the lesion where demyelination occurred.
“microglial activation is largely confined to the lesion where the demyelination has occurred.”
The paper relies on this without support.
At 7 days post-lesion, microglia are highly responsive and the lesion is transitioning from myelin debris cleanup to initial remyelination.
“We focused our analysis on 7 days post-lesion (7 dpl), a time point at which microglia are highly responsive and the lesion is undergoing a transition from myelin debris cleanup to the initial phases of remyelination (Fig 6a).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Demyelinated lesions contain a high density of activated microglia, generally in the core, where they can remove myelin debris and release factors into the lesion microenvironment.
“Demyelinated lesions contain a high density of activated microglia, generally in the core, where they can remove myelin debris and release factors into the lesion microenvironment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In MS, infiltrating immune cells specifically target myelin and cause white matter lesions.
“In MS, infiltrating immune cells specifically target myelin and cause white matter lesions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microglia migrate, grow, and proliferate in response to injury.
“Because microglia migrate, grow, and proliferate in response to injury”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aging-related cell states exhibited upregulation of genes (e.g., B2m and Trem2 in Micro-3, Xdh in Endo-3, Gfap and C4b in Astro-2) previously shown to be enriched in activated microglia, endothelial cells, and astrocytes.
“These aging-related cell states exhibit upregulation of genes (e.g., B2m and Trem2 in Micro-3, Xdh in Endo-3, and Gfap and C4b in Astro-2) (Figure 2C) that have been previously shown to be enriched in microglia, endothelial cells, and astrocytes activated by inflammation and/or aging.”
From Molecular and spatial signatures of mouse brain aging at single-cell resolution (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results section on inflammatory and interferon-responsive microglia in the aged brain (page unavailable) reports age-enriched microglial states that upregulate inflammatory genes. It does not identify B2m or Trem2 as markers of those states, or report the claimed Xdh enrichment in endothelial cells or Gfap and C4b enrichment in astrocytes. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious transcriptomic studies have revealed widespread changes in cell state in specific cell types with age, with many highlighting increased inflammation as a key aspect of brain aging.
“Previous transcriptomic studies have revealed widespread changes in cell state in specific cell types with age, with many of these studies highlighting a role for increased inflammation as a key aspect of brain aging.17–20,25–30”
From Molecular and spatial signatures of mouse brain aging at single-cell resolution (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results section reports an age-related increase in inflammatory and interferon-responsive microglial states, supporting the inflammation aspect of the claim. It also says these states comprise only a small fraction of microglia and that the vast majority are unaltered or only slightly altered by aging, so this study does not support describing its cell-state changes as widespread. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMicroglial and astrocytic activation has also been reported in aged rodent and human brains.
“Microglial and astrocytic activation has also been reported in aged rodent and human brains”
From Molecular and spatial signatures of mouse brain aging at single-cell resolution (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results section, “Small populations of inflammatory and interferon-responsive microglia emerge in the aged brain” (page not specified), reports an increase in these microglial states in aged mice, supporting the rodent microglia portion of the claim. It says these cells remain a small fraction of microglia; the passages do not report astrocytic activation or activation in aged human brains. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFor microglia and astrocytes, genes highly upregulated with age overlapped substantially with genes previously reported as upregulated in activated (reactive) states (e.g., Gfap and C4b for astrocytes; B2m and Lyz2 for microglia).
“For microglia and astrocytes, we observed that the genes highly upregulated with age overlapped substantially with genes that have been previously reported as being upregulated in the activated (or “reactive”) state of these cell types (e.g., Gfap and C4b for astrocytes; B2m and Lyz2 for microglia)”
From Molecular and spatial signatures of mouse brain aging at single-cell resolution (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results section, “Small populations of inflammatory and interferon-responsive microglia emerge in the aged brain” (page unavailable), reports that aging increases small populations of microglia with inflammatory or interferon-response gene expression. It does not establish substantial overlap between age-upregulated and reactive-state genes across microglia and astrocytes, or identify the cited examples B2m, Lyz2, Gfap, and C4b as such genes. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSingle-cell deep sequencing methods revealed regional-, age- and sex-dependent differences of the microglial population and various expression profiles defining microglial subpopulations.
“Recent progress in single-cell deep sequencing methods allowed for more refined differentiation and revealed regional-, age- and sex-dependent differences of the microglial population, and a growing number of studies demonstrate various expression profiles defining microglial subpopulations.”
From Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes (2021) · cites this paper as [102]
The Results sections on developmental subpopulations and axon tract–associated microglia report age-dependent transcriptional states and a subpopulation localized to particular brain regions. But the Results section on sex says clustering differed almost not at all between males and females, with only one very small female-enriched cluster; it concludes that diversity was largely unaffected by sex. Thus the sex-dependent part overstates this paper's findings. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Deep sequencing experiments revealed microglial differences depending on brain region, age, gender, and pathology.
“Recent experiments using deep sequencing revealed differences not only depending on the brain region, but also on age, gender, and pathology [28,39,99,102,108,109].”
From Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes (2021) · cites this paper as [102]
The Results report a regionally restricted microglial state in developing axon tracts, and the Abstract reports changes with age and after demyelinating injury. But the Results section on sex finds almost no difference in microglial clustering between males and females; only one very small cluster was enriched in females. Thus, the paper does not support gender as a comparable source of microglial differences. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIFN signalling, assessed by nuclear phospho-STAT1, was only active at 7 dpl in vivo and was selective to 58 ± 7% of PU.1+ nuclei.
“IFN signalling, assessed by nuclear phospho-STAT1, was only active at 7 dpl in vivo and was selective to 58 ± 7% of PU.1+ nuclei (Fig. 3N,O), consistent with the largest microglia subpopulation in this model having an interferon signature 16.”
From Central nervous system regeneration is driven by microglia necroptosis and repopulation (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
The Results section on demyelinated mouse lesions reports interferon-response genes in injury-responsive microglia, including Cxcl10 in subcluster IR2.2. It describes IR2.2 as one of several small subpopulations, however, and does not establish that the largest microglial subpopulation had an interferon signature. The phospho-STAT1 timing and 58 ± 7% measurement are attributed to the citing paper’s own Fig. 3N,O, not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPresence of a type I IFN signature in brain cells, in particular microglia, is increasingly associated with ageing and neurodegenerative disease in various species.
“The presence of a type I IFN signature in brain cells, in particular in microglia, is increasingly being associated with ageing and neurodegenerative disease in various species13,15,39,44–50.”
From cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
The Results section on aged microglia (page unavailable) reports interferon-response genes in a small subset of aged mouse microglia and suggests those cells may mark sites of neuronal injury or degeneration. It does not establish a type I IFN signature associated with neurodegenerative disease across various species; its human MS-lesion findings concern a different marker. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a model of demyelination, proliferative microglia cluster as a population (Birc5+) independent of other pathological microglia in scRNA-seq.
“While a previous study reported that in a model of demyelination, proliferative microglia cluster as a population (Birc5+) independent of other pathological microglia in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) (67)”
From Arresting the bad seed: HDAC3 regulates proliferation of different microglia after ischemic stroke (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
A cold mechanical dissociation protocol isolates microglia for scRNA-seq with minimal ex vivo transcriptional alterations.
“Previously, we optimized a cold mechanical dissociation protocol to isolate microglia for scRNA-seq with minimal ex vivo transcriptional alterations15.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Adult microglia are largely homogenous.
“In line with our previous work15, we find that adult microglia are largely homogenous.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Inflammatory cytokines have been seen previously in a sub-set of microglia in aged C57BL/6 mice.
“inflammatory cytokines have been seen previously in a sub-set of microglia in aged C57BL/6 mice”
From Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Divergence of the Primate Microglia Program (2019) · cites this paper as Hammond et al., 2019
Most markers of developmental diversity are robustly expressed across all clusters of primary cultured microglia rather than in a cluster-specific fashion, except macrophage cluster (cluster 0) and proliferative cluster (cluster 6).
“We plotted markers associated with microglia in the developing mouse brain from Hammond et al. 2018 [22] and found that most markers of developmental diversity are robustly expressed across all clusters rather than in a cluster-specific fashion, except macrophage cluster (cluster 0) and proliferative cluster (cluster 6) (Fig. 1D).”
From Culture shock: microglial heterogeneity, activation, and disrupted single-cell microglial networks in vitro (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Both the activated and interferon-related clusters increased expression of genes upregulated in injury response microglia seen following focal demyelination from lysolecithin injection.
“both the activated and the interferon-related cluster increased expression of genes upregulated in injury response microglia seen following focal demyelination from lysolecithin injection [22]”
From Culture shock: microglial heterogeneity, activation, and disrupted single-cell microglial networks in vitro (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
The microglia population is highly heterogeneous, comprised of cells in discrete transcriptional dynamic substates that appear in defined contexts and brain regions.
“Indeed, the microglia population is highly heterogeneous, comprised of cells in discrete transcriptional dynamic “substates” that appear in defined contexts and brain regions [333,334,335,336].”
From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [335]
Single cell RNA sequencing has identified at least 9 distinct microglial signatures with varying predominance depending on the health status of the neuronal tissue.
“Single cell RNA sequencing has been particularly useful, with at least 9 distinct microglial signatures identified with varying predominance, depending on the health status of the neuronal tissue [73,74].”
From Risk mitigation of immunogenicity: a key to personalized retinal gene therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Single-cell transcriptomic studies reveal a relatively homogeneous adult microglia population and greater heterogeneity of microglia states at different developmental stages, during aging, and in pathological conditions.
“Single-cell transcriptomic studies reveal a relatively homogeneous adult microglia population, and greater heterogeneity of microglia states at different developmental stages, during aging and in pathological conditions (Hammond et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019; Masuda et al., 2019).”
From What is a cell type and how to define it? (2022) · cites this paper as Hammond et al., 2019
Some microglial populations are selectively dependent on Trem2, as shown by single-cell RNA-seq.
“Differences in gene expression profiles of different microglial populations have been recently described using single cell RNA-seq showing some microglial populations are selectively dependent on Trem2 (58–62).”
From <i>Trem2</i> promotes anti-inflammatory responses in microglia and is suppressed under pro-inflammatory conditions (2020) · cites this paper as [62]
A distinct subpopulation of microglia that reside in white matter are selectively activated by systemic insults such as exposure to the chemotherapy drug methotrexate.
“A distinct subpopulation of microglia that reside in white matter (Hammond et al., 2019) are selectively activated by systemic insults such as exposure to the chemotherapy drug methotrexate (Gibson et al., 2019).”
From Mild respiratory COVID can cause multi-lineage neural cell and myelin dysregulation (2022) · cites this paper as Hammond et al., 2019
The overlapping phenotypes of reactive and senescent microglia, together with heterogeneity of microglial phenotypes in aging and disease, present a challenge to defining senescent microglia and parsing their contribution to dysfunction.
“The overlapping phenotypes of reactive and senescent microglia together with the heterogeneity of microglial phenotypes described in aging and disease [45,46] present a nuanced challenge to defining senescent microglia and parsing out their contribution to dysfunction.”
From Untangling senescent and damage‐associated microglia in the aging and diseased brain (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
In a reactionary or dystrophic state, microglia contribute to the pathogenesis of various NDs and post-TBI syndromes.
“However, in a reactionary or dystrophic state, microglia also contribute to the pathogenesis of various NDs and post-TBI syndromes [43–45].”
From Untangling senescent and damage‐associated microglia in the aging and diseased brain (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
A study by Hammond et al. identified two microglial populations highly concentrated in aged mice - one defined by Ccl4, and another enriched in several interferon-response genes - and a cluster predominantly in injured mice characterized by Ifi27l2a.
“For example, a study by Hammond et al. compared microglia from developing, aged, and mice injured from a focal white matter injury and identified two populations highly concentrated in aged mice – one defined by Ccl4, and another enriched in several interferon-response genes [45]. In addition, a cluster predominantly in injured mice characterized by Ifi27l2a was also identified [45].”
From Untangling senescent and damage‐associated microglia in the aging and diseased brain (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
TMEM119 has been shown to be stably and selectively expressed in adult microglia.
“TMEM119 has been shown to be stably and selectively expressed in adult microglia (9, 95)”
From The Transcriptional Landscape of Microglial Genes in Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [95]
Several publications within the last 2 years have employed scRNAseq and mass cytometry of microglia and other CNS immune cells to understand global alterations in immunological gene expression and dynamic changes in immune cell-type abundance as a function of brain anatomy, aging, and neurodegeneration.
“Several publications within the last 2 years have begun to employ scRNAseq and mass cytometry of microglia and other CNS immune cells as ways to understand (i) global alterations in immunological gene expression and (ii) dynamic changes in immune cell-type abundance as a function of brain anatomy, aging, and neurodegeneration (87, 95, 107, 108).”
From The Transcriptional Landscape of Microglial Genes in Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [95]
Differentially expressed genes between macrophage states included Lyve1, Spp1, Slc40a1, and Spic.
“Differentially expressed genes between states included the hyaluronan receptor Lyve1 (Jordão et al., 2019a; Lim et al., 2018); Spp1, a potential regulator of phagocytosis in the brain (Hammond et al., 2019); Slc40a1, an iron transporter; and Spic, which marks red pulp macrophages (Haldar et al., 2014) and bone marrow macrophages (Kohyama et al., 2009) that we confirmed by IHC (Figure 5C, S5C).”
From A cellular and spatial map of the choroid plexus across brain ventricles and ages (2021) · cites this paper as Hammond et al., 2019
Most choroid plexus macrophages were Sall1 negative.
“and were Sall1 negative (Hammond et al., 2019).”
From A cellular and spatial map of the choroid plexus across brain ventricles and ages (2021) · cites this paper as Hammond et al., 2019
Our dataset and others have reported a minimal effect of sex even in young adult cells (8 weeks).
“However, our dataset and others have reported a minimal effect of sex even in young adult cells (8 weeks)16,20.”
From Mouse microglia express unique miRNA-mRNA networks to facilitate age-specific functions in the developing central nervous system (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
Microglial functions vary across different ages, disease pathologies, and between sexes.
“In addition, microglial functions vary across different ages, disease pathologies, and between sexes10–16.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890 · see citing works
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174 · see citing works
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
Choi, D. W. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 8,152 · see citing works
Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia
Liddelow, S. A., Guttenplan, K. A., Clarke, L. E., Bennett, F. C., Bohlen, C. J., Schirmer, L., Bennett, M. L., Münch, A. E., Chung, W.-S., Peterson, T. C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21029 · Cited by 7,971 · see citing works
Self-citationMassively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353 · see citing works
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data
Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F., & Regev, A. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3192 · Cited by 7,055 · see citing works
Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines
Murray, P. J., Allen, J. E., Biswas, S. K., Fisher, E. A., Gilroy, D. W., Goerdt, S., Gordon, S., Hamilton, J. A., Ivashkiv, L. B., Lawrence, T., et al. (2014) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008 · Cited by 6,337 · see citing works
A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease
Keren-Shaul, H., Spinrad, A., Weiner, A., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Dvir-Szternfeld, R., Ulland, T. K., David, E., Baruch, K., Lara-Astaiso, D., Toth, B., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 · Cited by 5,493 · see citing works
Fate Mapping Analysis Reveals That Adult Microglia Derive from Primitive Macrophages
Ginhoux, F., Greter, M., Leboeuf, M., Nandi, S., See, P., Gokhan, S., Mehler, M. F., Conway, S. J., Ng, L. G., Stanley, E. R., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194637 · Cited by 5,175 · see citing works
Self-citationCellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes
Carpenter, A. E., Jones, T. R., Lamprecht, M. R., Clarke, C., Kang, I. H., Friman, O., Guertin, D. A., Chang, J. H., Lindquist, R. A., Moffat, J., et al. (2006) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 · Cited by 5,172 · see citing works
Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells
Klein, A. M., Mazutis, L., Akartuna, I., Tallapragada, N., Veres, A., Li, V., Peshkin, L., Weitz, D. A., & Kirschner, M. W. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · Cited by 3,356 · see citing works
Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models
Hong, S., Beja-Glasser, V. F., Nfonoyim, B. M., Frouin, A., Li, S., Ramakrishnan, S., Merry, K. M., Shi, Q., Rosenthal, A., Barres, B. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8373 · Cited by 3,343 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, microglia become activated and aberrantly remove synapses in the early stages of pathology in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease, well before cognitive decline and plaque formation (Hong et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIdentification of a unique TGF-β–dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia
Butovsky, O., Jedrychowski, M. P., Moore, C. S., Cialic, R., Lanser, A. J., Gabriely, G., Koeglsperger, T., Dake, B., Wu, P. M., Doykan, C. E., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3599 · Cited by 2,543 · see citing works
Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4
Sekar, A., Bialas, A. R., de Rivera, H., Davis, A., Hammond, T. R., Kamitaki, N., Tooley, K., Presumey, J., Baum, M., Van Doren, V., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16549 · Cited by 2,394 · see citing works
Self-citationMills, E. L., Kelly, B., Logan, A., Costa, A. S. H., Varma, M., Bryant, C. E., Tourlomousis, P., Däbritz, J. H. M., Gottlieb, E., Latorre, I., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.064 · Cited by 2,291 · see citing works
Tissue-Resident Macrophage Enhancer Landscapes Are Shaped by the Local Microenvironment
Lavin, Y., Winter, D., Blecher-Gonen, R., David, E., Keren-Shaul, H., Merad, M., Jung, S., & Amit, I. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.018 · Cited by 2,167 · see citing works
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus
Montagne, A., Barnes, S. R., Sweeney, M. D., Halliday, M. R., Sagare, A. P., Zhao, Z., Toga, A. W., Jacobs, R. E., Liu, C. Y., Amezcua, L., et al. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.032 · Cited by 2,102 · see citing works
Franceschi, C., Capri, M., Monti, D., Giunta, S., Olivieri, F., Sevini, F., Panourgia, M. P., Invidia, L., Celani, L., Scurti, M., et al. (2007) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.016 · Cited by 2,087 · see citing works
Jha, A. K., Huang, S. C.-C., Sergushichev, A., Lampropoulou, V., Ivanova, Y., Loginicheva, E., Chmielewski, K., Stewart, K. M., Ashall, J., Everts, B., et al. (2015) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.005 · Cited by 2,066 · see citing works
Initiative, T. A. D. N., Hollingworth, P., CHARGE consortium, EADI1 consortium, Harold, D., Sims, R., Gerrish, A., Lambert, J.-C., Carrasquillo, M. M., Abraham, R., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.803 · Cited by 1,997 · see citing works
Elmore, M. R. P., Najafi, A. R., Koike, M. A., Dagher, N. N., Spangenberg, E. E., Rice, R. A., Kitazawa, M., Matusow, B., Nguyen, H., West, B. L., et al. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.040 · Cited by 1,968 · see citing works
Naj, A. C., Jun, G., Beecham, G. W., Wang, L.-S., Vardarajan, B. N., Buros, J., Gallins, P. J., Buxbaum, J. D., Jarvik, G. P., Crane, P. K., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.801 · Cited by 1,901 · see citing works
Molecular diversity and specializations among the cells of the adult mouse brain
Saunders, A., Macosko, E. Z., Wysoker, A., Goldman, M., Krienen, F. M., de Rivera, H., Bien, E., Baum, M., Bortolin, L., Wang, S., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.028 · Cited by 1,847 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For both rounds of analysis, independent components that captured batch or replicate effects were removed before clustering analysis (Figure S2D), as previously described (Saunders et al., 2018).”
MethodSelf-citationNew tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS
Bennett, M. L., Bennett, F. C., Liddelow, S. A., Ajami, B., Zamanian, J. L., Fernhoff, N. B., Mulinyawe, S. B., Bohlen, C. J., Adil, A., Tucker, A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525528113 · Cited by 1,804 · see citing works
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity
Calandra, T., & Roger, T. (2003) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1200 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
M2 microglia and macrophages drive oligodendrocyte differentiation during CNS remyelination
Miron, V. E., Boyd, A., Zhao, J.-W., Yuen, T. J., Ruckh, J. M., Shadrach, J. L., van Wijngaarden, P., Wagers, A. J., Williams, A., Franklin, R. J. M., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3469 · Cited by 1,788 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroglia emerge as central players in brain disease
Salter, M. W., & Stevens, B. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4397 · Cited by 1,767 · see citing works
Self-citationImmunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function
O'Neill, L. A. J., & Pearce, E. J. (2015) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20151570 · Cited by 1,715 · see citing works
The Impact of Age on Cognition
Murman, D. (2015) · Seminars in Hearing · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555115 · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist?
Ransohoff, R. M. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4338 · Cited by 1,573 · see citing works
The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides
Haynes, S. E., Hollopeter, G., Yang, G., Kurpius, D., Dailey, M. E., Gan, W.-B., & Julius, D. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1805 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing
Hickman, S. E., Kingery, N. D., Ohsumi, T. K., Borowsky, M. L., Wang, L.-C., Means, T. K., & El Khoury, J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3554 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice
Sorge, R. E., Mapplebeck, J. C. S., Rosen, S., Beggs, S., Taves, S., Alexander, J. K., Martin, L. J., Austin, J.-S., Sotocinal, S. G., Chen, D., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4053 · Cited by 1,442 · see citing works
Gosselin, D., Link, V. M., Romanoski, C. E., Fonseca, G. J., Eichenfield, D. Z., Spann, N. J., Stender, J. D., Chun, H. B., Garner, H., Geissmann, F., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.023 · Cited by 1,307 · see citing works
Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces
Goldmann, T., Wieghofer, P., Jordão, M. J. C., Prutek, F., Hagemeyer, N., Frenzel, K., Amann, L., Staszewski, O., Kierdorf, K., Krueger, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3423 · Cited by 1,209 · see citing works
Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis
Matcovitch-Natan, O., Winter, D. R., Giladi, A., Vargas Aguilar, S., Spinrad, A., Sarrazin, S., Ben-Yehuda, H., David, E., Zelada González, F., Perrin, P., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8670 · Cited by 1,180 · see citing works
Microglial brain region-dependent diversity and selective regional sensitivities to aging
Grabert, K., Michoel, T., Karavolos, M. H., Clohisey, S., Baillie, J. K., Stevens, M. P., Freeman, T. C., Summers, K. M., & McColl, B. W. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4222 · Cited by 1,151 · see citing works
Everts, B., Amiel, E., Huang, S. C.-C., Smith, A. M., Chang, C.-H., Lam, W. Y., Redmann, V., Freitas, T. C., Blagih, J., van der Windt, G. J. W., et al. (2014) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2833 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Specification of tissue-resident macrophages during organogenesis
Mass, E., Ballesteros, I., Farlik, M., Halbritter, F., Günther, P., Crozet, L., Jacome-Galarza, C. E., Händler, K., Klughammer, J., Kobayashi, Y., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf4238 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Systems biology approaches identify ATF3 as a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 4
Gilchrist, M., Thórsson, V., Li, B., Rust, A. G., Korb, M., Kennedy, K., Hai, T., Bolouri, H., & Aderem, A. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04768 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Layer V cortical neurons require microglial support for survival during postnatal development
Ueno, M., Fujita, Y., Tanaka, T., Nakamura, Y., Kikuta, J., Ishii, M., & Yamashita, T. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3358 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Microbiome Influences Prenatal and Adult Microglia in a Sex-Specific Manner
Thion, M. S., Low, D., Silvin, A., Chen, J., Grisel, P., Schulte-Schrepping, J., Blecher, R., Ulas, T., Squarzoni, P., Hoeffel, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.042 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Takeuchi, H., Jin, S., Wang, J., Zhang, G., Kawanokuchi, J., Kuno, R., Sonobe, Y., Mizuno, T., & Suzumura, A. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m600504200 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Temporal Tracking of Microglia Activation in Neurodegeneration at Single-Cell Resolution
Mathys, H., Adaikkan, C., Gao, F., Young, J. Z., Manet, E., Hemberg, M., De Jager, P. L., Ransohoff, R. M., Regev, A., & Tsai, L.-H. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.039 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Loss of ‘homeostatic’ microglia and patterns of their activation in active multiple sclerosis
Zrzavy, T., Hametner, S., Wimmer, I., Butovsky, O., Weiner, H. L., & Lassmann, H. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx113 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Microglia Modulate Wiring of the Embryonic Forebrain
Squarzoni, P., Oller, G., Hoeffel, G., Pont‐Lezica, L., Rostaing, P., Low, D., Bessis, A., Ginhoux, F., & Garel, S. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.042 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Aging-induced type I interferon response at the choroid plexus negatively affects brain function
Baruch, K., Deczkowska, A., David, E., Castellano, J. M., Miller, O., Kertser, A., Berkutzki, T., Barnett-Itzhaki, Z., Bezalel, D., Wyss-Coray, T., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1252945 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Rademakers, R., Baker, M., Nicholson, A. M., Rutherford, N. J., Finch, N., Soto-Ortolaza, A., Lash, J., Wider, C., Wojtas, A., DeJesus-Hernandez, M., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1027 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Hagemeyer, N., Hanft, K.-M., Akriditou, M.-A., Unger, N., Park, E. S., Stanley, E. R., Staszewski, O., Dimou, L., & Prinz, M. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1747-1 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
A novel microglial subset plays a key role in myelinogenesis in developing brain
Wlodarczyk, A., Holtman, I. R., Krueger, M., Yogev, N., Bruttger, J., Khorooshi, R., Benmamar‐Badel, A., de Boer‐Bergsma, J. J., Martin, N. A., Karram, K., et al. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201696056 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
A combination of ontogeny and CNS environment establishes microglial identity
Bennett, F. C., Bennett, M. L., Yaqoob, F., Mulinyawe, S. B., Grant, G. A., Hayden Gephart, M., Plowey, E. D., & Barres, B. A. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.014 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Quantitating the subtleties of microglial morphology with fractal analysis
Karperien, A., Ahammer, H., & Jelinek, H. F. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00003 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Pearce, E. J., & Everts, B. (2014) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3771 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Loss-of-function mutations in TYROBP (DAP12) result in a presenile dementia with bone cysts
Paloneva, J., Kestilä, M., Wu, J., Salminen, A., Böhling, T., Ruotsalainen, V., Hakola, P., Bakker, A. B. H., Phillips, J. H., Pekkarinen, P., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/77153 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Cerebral microinfarcts: the invisible lesions
Smith, E. E., Schneider, J. A., Wardlaw, J. M., & Greenberg, S. M. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70307-6 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Microglia turnover with aging and in an Alzheimer’s model via long-term in vivo single-cell imaging
Füger, P., Hefendehl, J. K., Veeraraghavalu, K., Wendeln, A.-C., Schlosser, C., Obermüller, U., Wegenast-Braun, B. M., Neher, J. J., Martus, P., Kohsaka, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4631 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Hanamsagar, R., Alter, M. D., Block, C. S., Sullivan, H., Bolton, J. L., & Bilbo, S. D. (2017) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.23176 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Ye, L., Huang, Y., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Sun, L., Zhou, Y., Qian, G., & Zheng, J. (2013) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.12263 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Microglia Function in Central Nervous System Development and Plasticity
Schafer, D. P., & Stevens, B. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a020545 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Self-citationDealing with danger in the CNS: the response of the immune system to injury
Gadani, S. P., Walsh, J. T., Lukens, J. R., & Kipnis, J. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.019 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Chou, R. C., Kim, N. D., Sadik, C. D., Seung, E., Lan, Y., Byrne, M. H., Haribabu, B., Iwakura, Y., & Luster, A. D. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.07.018 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Hanamsagar, R., Alter, M. D., Block, C. L., Sullivan, H. K., Bolton, J. L., & Bilbo, S. D. (2017) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.23277 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Poon, H. F., Calabrese, V., Scapagnini, G., & Butterfield, D. A. (2004) · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cger.2004.02.005 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
A Starring Role for Microglia in Brain Sex Differences
Lenz, K. M., & McCarthy, M. M. (2015) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858414536468 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Xu, H., Chen, M., Manivannan, A., Lois, N., & Forrester, J. V. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00351.x · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Hall, S. (1972) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.10.2.535 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Weber, C., Weber, K. S. C., Klier, C. M., Gu, S., Wank, R., Horuk, R., & Nelson, P. J. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v97.4.1144 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Chemokines and chemokine receptors in multiple sclerosis. Potential targets for new therapies
Szczuciński, A., & Losy, J. (2006) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00749.x · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Astrocyte-derived endothelin-1 inhibits remyelination through notch activation
Hammond, T. R., Gadea, A., Dupree, J., Kerninon, C., Nait-Oumesmar, B., Aguirre, A., & Gallo, V. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.015 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationFatty acid binding proteins in brain development and disease
Liu, R., Mita, R., Beaulieu, M., Gao, Z., & Godbout, R. (2010) · The International Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1387/ijdb.092976rl · Cited by 170 · see citing works
A family of non-GPCR chemosensors defines an alternative logic for mammalian olfaction
Greer, P. L., Bear, D. M., Lassance, J.-M., Bloom, M. L., Tsukahara, T., Pashkovski, S. L., Masuda, F. K., Nowlan, A. C., Kirchner, R., Hoekstra, H. E., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.001 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Kreshuk, A., Straehle, C., Sommer, C., Köthe, U., Cantoni, M., Knott, G. W., & Hamprecht, F. A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024899 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The MS4A family: counting past 1, 2 and 3
Kuek, L. E., Leffler, M., Mackay, G. A., & Hulett, M. D. (2015) · Immunology and Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/icb.2015.48 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Pappatà, S., Cornu, P., Samson, Y., Prenant, C., Bénavidès, J., Scatton, B., Crouzel, C., Hauw, J., & Syrota, A. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Imaging of microglia in patients with neurodegenerative disorders
Politis, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2012.00096 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Furuichi, K., Gao, J.-L., Horuk, R., Wada, T., Kaneko, S., & Murphy, P. M. (2008) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.12.8670 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Kannan-Thulasiraman, P., Seachrist, D. D., Mahabeleshwar, G. H., Jain, M. K., & Noy, N. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.099770 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Mahad, D., Trebst, C., Kivisäkk, P., Staugaitis, S. M., Tucky, B. H., Wei, T., Lucchinetti, C. F., Lassmann, H., & Ransohoff, R. M. (2004) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/63.3.262 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Mice deficient in NRROS show abnormal microglial development and neurological disorders
Wong, K., Noubade, R., Manzanillo, P., Ota, N., Foreman, O., Hackney, J. A., Friedman, B. A., Pappu, R., Scearce-Levie, K., & Ouyang, W. (2017) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3743 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Inflammation links ageing to the brain
Gabuzda, D. H., & Yankner, B. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12100 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
MS4A Cluster in Alzheimer’s Disease
Ma, J., Yu, J., & Tan, L. (2014) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-014-8800-z · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Saunders, A., Macosko, E., Wysoker, A., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/299081 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads
Paolicelli, R. C., Sierra, A., Stevens, B., Tremblay, M.-E., Aguzzi, A., Ajami, B., Amit, I., Audinat, E., Bechmann, I., Bennett, M., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020 · Cited by 1,973 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroglia Biology: One Century of Evolving Concepts
Prinz, M., Jung, S., & Priller, J. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.053 · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
Marschallinger, J., Iram, T., Zardeneta, M., Lee, S. E., Lehallier, B., Haney, M. S., Pluvinage, J. V., Mathur, V., Hahn, O., Morgens, D. W., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0566-1 · Cited by 1,384 · see citing works
“…in aging40, ALS41, and AD42, and of microglia subpopulations recently identified in development, aging and disease, including “disease-associated microglia” (DAM)12, “neurodegenerative microglia” (MGnD)11, and microglia clusters revealed by Li et al. (2019) and Hammond et al. (2019)14, 15.”
BackgroundInfluentialA single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse
The Tabula Muris Consortium, Almanzar, N., Antony, J., Baghel, A. S., Bakerman, I., Bansal, I., Barres, B. A., Beachy, P. A., Berdnik, D., Bilen, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2496-1 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution
Masuda, T., Sankowski, R., Staszewski, O., Böttcher, C., Amann, L., Sagar, Scheiwe, C., Nessler, S., Kunz, P., van Loo, G., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0924-x · Cited by 1,310 · see citing works
Van Hove, H., Martens, L., Scheyltjens, I., De Vlaminck, K., Pombo Antunes, A. R., De Prijck, S., Vandamme, N., De Schepper, S., Van Isterdael, G., Scott, C. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0393-4 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration
Gulen, M. F., Samson, N., Keller, A., Schwabenland, M., Liu, C., Glück, S., Thacker, V. V., Favre, L., Mangeat, B., Kroese, L. J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06373-1 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
Sala Frigerio, C., Wolfs, L., Fattorelli, N., Thrupp, N., Voytyuk, I., Schmidt, I., Mancuso, R., Chen, W.-T., Woodbury, M. E., Srivastava, G., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.099 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Johnson, E. C. B., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Ping, L., Zhou, M., Yin, L., Higginbotham, L. A., Guajardo, A., White, B., Troncoso, J. C., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6 · Cited by 1,001 · see citing works
Overview of General and Discriminating Markers of Differential Microglia Phenotypes
Jurga, A. M., Paleczna, M., & Kuter, K. Z. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.00198 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation
Jordão, M. J. C., Sankowski, R., Brendecke, S. M., Sagar, Locatelli, G., Tai, Y.-H., Tay, T. L., Schramm, E., Armbruster, S., Hagemeyer, N., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7554 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
GD2-CAR T cell therapy for H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas
Majzner, R. G., Ramakrishna, S., Yeom, K. W., Patel, S., Chinnasamy, H., Schultz, L. M., Richards, R. M., Jiang, L., Barsan, V. V., Mancusi, R. A., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04489-4 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Microglia: Immune and non-immune functions
Borst, K., Dumas, A. A., & Prinz, M. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.014 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Microglia Heterogeneity in the Single-Cell Era
Masuda, T., Sankowski, R., Staszewski, O., & Prinz, M. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.010 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain
Ximerakis, M., Lipnick, S. L., Innes, B. T., Simmons, S. K., Adiconis, X., Dionne, D., Mayweather, B. A., Nguyen, L., Niziolek, Z., Ozek, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0491-3 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Microglia-mediated T cell infiltration drives neurodegeneration in tauopathy
Chen, X., Firulyova, M., Manis, M., Herz, J., Smirnov, I., Aladyeva, E., Wang, C., Bao, X., Finn, M. B., Hu, H., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05788-0 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Tissue-specific macrophages: how they develop and choreograph tissue biology
Mass, E., Nimmerjahn, F., Kierdorf, K., & Schlitzer, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-023-00848-y · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19
Yang, A. C., Kern, F., Losada, P. M., Agam, M. R., Maat, C. A., Schmartz, G. P., Fehlmann, T., Stein, J. A., Schaum, N., Lee, D. P., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03710-0 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Microglia and Central Nervous System–Associated Macrophages—From Origin to Disease Modulation
Prinz, M., Masuda, T., Wheeler, M. A., & Quintana, F. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-110159 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer disease
Heneka, M. T., van der Flier, W. M., Jessen, F., Hoozemanns, J., Thal, D. R., Boche, D., Brosseron, F., Teunissen, C., Zetterberg, H., Jacobs, A. H., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-024-01104-7 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Microglia in Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration: From Understanding to Therapy
Muzio, L., Viotti, A., & Martino, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.742065 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Microglia in depression: an overview of microglia in the pathogenesis and treatment of depression
Wang, H., He, Y., Sun, Z., Ren, S., Liu, M., Wang, G., & Yang, J. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02492-0 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Microglial regional heterogeneity and its role in the brain
Tan, Y.-L., Yuan, Y., & Tian, L. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0609-8 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Type I interferon response drives neuroinflammation and synapse loss in Alzheimer disease
Roy, E. R., Wang, B., Wan, Y.-W., Chiu, G., Cole, A., Yin, Z., Propson, N. E., Xu, Y., Jankowsky, J. L., Liu, Z., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci133737 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Molecular architecture of the developing mouse brain
La Manno, G., Siletti, K., Furlan, A., Gyllborg, D., Vinsland, E., Mossi Albiach, A., Mattsson Langseth, C., Khven, I., Lederer, A. R., Dratva, L. M., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03775-x · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Microglial subtypes: diversity within the microglial community
Stratoulias, V., Venero, J. L., Tremblay, M., & Joseph, B. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019101997 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Astrocytes in chronic pain and itch
Ji, R., Donnelly, C. R., & Nedergaard, M. (2019) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0218-1 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Functional roles of reactive astrocytes in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration
Patani, R., Hardingham, G. E., & Liddelow, S. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00822-1 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Mild respiratory COVID can cause multi-lineage neural cell and myelin dysregulation
Fernández-Castañeda, A., Lu, P., Geraghty, A. C., Song, E., Lee, M.-H., Wood, J., O’Dea, M. R., Dutton, S., Shamardani, K., Nwangwu, K., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.008 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Molecularly defined and spatially resolved cell atlas of the whole mouse brain
Zhang, M., Pan, X., Jung, W., Halpern, A. R., Eichhorn, S. W., Lei, Z., Cohen, L., Smith, K. A., Tasic, B., Yao, Z., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06808-9 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Microglia regulate central nervous system myelin growth and integrity
McNamara, N. B., Munro, D. A. D., Bestard-Cuche, N., Uyeda, A., Bogie, J. F. J., Hoffmann, A., Holloway, R. K., Molina-Gonzalez, I., Askew, K. E., Mitchell, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05534-y · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Human microglial state dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease progression
Sun, N., Victor, M. B., Park, Y. P., Xiong, X., Scannail, A. N., Leary, N., Prosper, S., Viswanathan, S., Luna, X., Boix, C. A., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.037 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
What is a cell type and how to define it?
Zeng, H. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.031 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer's disease
Sims, R., Hill, M., & Williams, J. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0599-5 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Myelin dysfunction drives amyloid-β deposition in models of Alzheimer’s disease
Depp, C., Sun, T., Sasmita, A. O., Spieth, L., Berghoff, S. A., Nazarenko, T., Overhoff, K., Steixner-Kumar, A. A., Subramanian, S., Arinrad, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06120-6 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
White matter aging drives microglial diversity
Safaiyan, S., Besson-Girard, S., Kaya, T., Cantuti-Castelvetri, L., Liu, L., Ji, H., Schifferer, M., Gouna, G., Usifo, F., Kannaiyan, N., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.027 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Divergence of the Primate Microglia Program
Geirsdottir, L., David, E., Keren-Shaul, H., Weiner, A., Bohlen, S. C., Neuber, J., Balic, A., Giladi, A., Sheban, F., Dutertre, C.-A., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.010 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond
Baudouin, C., Kolko, M., Parsadaniantz, S. M., & Messmer, E. S. B. M. (2020) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100916 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Astrocytes and microglia: In sickness and in health
Vainchtein, I. D., & Molofsky, A. V. (2020) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.01.003 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Mapping microglia states in the human brain through the integration of high-dimensional techniques
Sankowski, R., Böttcher, C., Masuda, T., Geirsdottir, L., Sagar, Sindram, E., Seredenina, T., Muhs, A., Scheiwe, C., Shah, M. J., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0532-y · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Molecular and spatial signatures of mouse brain aging at single-cell resolution
Allen, W. E., Blosser, T. R., Sullivan, Z. A., Dulac, C., & Zhuang, X. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.010 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
“for astrocytes; B2m and Lyz2 for microglia).(25,29,40,43) These activated astrocytes and microglia have been observed in both healthy and diseased brains, often responding to brain injury, inflammation, or degeneration.”
BackgroundCrosstalk Between Astrocytes and Microglia: An Overview
Matejuk, A., & Ransohoff, R. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01416 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Early Fate Defines Microglia and Non-parenchymal Brain Macrophage Development
Utz, S. G., See, P., Mildenberger, W., Thion, M. S., Silvin, A., Lutz, M., Ingelfinger, F., Rayan, N. A., Lelios, I., Buttgereit, A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.021 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Microglia-organized scar-free spinal cord repair in neonatal mice
Li, Y., He, X., Kawaguchi, R., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Monavarfeshani, A., Yang, Z., Chen, B., Shi, Z., Meng, H., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2795-6 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Marsh, S. E., Walker, A. J., Kamath, T., Dissing-Olesen, L., Hammond, T. R., de Soysa, T. Y., Young, A. M. H., Murphy, S., Abdulraouf, A., Nadaf, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01022-8 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Self-citationTreg cell-derived osteopontin promotes microglia-mediated white matter repair after ischemic stroke
Shi, L., Sun, Z., Su, W., Xu, F., Xie, D., Zhang, Q. C., Dai, X., Iyer, K., Hitchens, T. K., Foley, L. M., et al. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.022 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
The neurobiology of long COVID
Monje, M., & Iwasaki, A. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.006 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Microglia morphophysiological diversity and its implications for the CNS
Vidal-Itriago, A., Radford, R. A. W., Aramideh, J. A., Maurel, C., Scherer, N. M., Don, E. K., Lee, A., Chung, R. S., Graeber, M. B., & Morsch, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.997786 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Immune cell regulation of glia during CNS injury and disease
Greenhalgh, A. D., David, S., & Bennett, F. C. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0263-9 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Microglia and astrocyte dysfunction in parkinson's disease
Kam, T., Hinkle, J. T., Dawson, T. M., & Dawson, V. L. (2020) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105028 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
A cellular and spatial map of the choroid plexus across brain ventricles and ages
Dani, N., Herbst, R. H., McCabe, C., Green, G. S., Kaiser, K., Head, J. P., Cui, J., Shipley, F. B., Jang, A., Dionne, D., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.003 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
The pro-remyelination properties of microglia in the central nervous system
Lloyd, A. F., & Miron, V. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0184-2 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Microglia Require CD4 T Cells to Complete the Fetal-to-Adult Transition
Pasciuto, E., Burton, O. T., Roca, C. P., Lagou, V., Rajan, W. D., Theys, T., Mancuso, R., Tito, R. Y., Kouser, L., Callaerts-Vegh, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.026 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationSilvin, A., Uderhardt, S., Piot, C., Da Mesquita, S., Yang, K., Geirsdottir, L., Mulder, K., Eyal, D., Liu, Z., Bridlance, C., et al. (2022) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2022.07.004 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroglia: Agents of the CNS Pro-Inflammatory Response
Rodríguez-Gómez, J. A., Kavanagh, E., Engskog-Vlachos, P., Engskog, M. K. R., Herrera, A. J., Espinosa-Oliva, A. M., Joseph, B., Hajji, N., Venero, J. L., & Burguillos, M. A. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071717 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Dysmaturation of Premature Brain: Importance, Cellular Mechanisms, and Potential Interventions
Volpe, J. J. (2019) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.02.016 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Immune Signaling in Neurodegeneration
Hammond, T. R., Marsh, S. E., & Stevens, B. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.016 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationOsorio, D., Zhong, Y., Li, G., Xu, Q., Yang, Y., Hillhouse, A., Chen, J., Davidson, L. A., Tian, Y., Chapkin, R. S., et al. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100434 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Microglia in Alzheimer's disease at single-cell level. Are there common patterns in humans and mice?
Chen, Y., & Colonna, M. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20202717 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Neuron-glia signaling in synapse elimination
Wilton, D. K., Dissing-Olesen, L., & Stevens, B. (2019) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050306 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Self-citationGABA-Receptive Microglia Selectively Sculpt Developing Inhibitory Circuits
Favuzzi, E., Huang, S., Saldi, G.-A., Binan, L., Ibrahim, L. A., Fernández-Otero, M., Cao, Y., Zeine, A., Sefah, A., Zheng, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.018 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroglia and Inflammatory Responses in Diabetic Retinopathy
Kinuthia, U. M., Wolf, A., & Langmann, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.564077 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: deciphering brain complexity in health and disease
Piwecka, M., Rajewsky, N., & Rybak-Wolf, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00809-y · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Central nervous system regeneration is driven by microglia necroptosis and repopulation
Lloyd, A. F., Davies, C. L., Holloway, R. K., Labrak, Y., Ireland, G., Carradori, D., Dillenburg, A., Borger, E., Soong, D., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0418-z · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Microglia coordinate cellular interactions during spinal cord repair in mice
Brennan, F. H., Li, Y., Wang, C., Ma, A., Guo, Q., Li, Y., Pukos, N., Campbell, W. A., Witcher, K. G., Guan, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31797-0 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Novel Hexb-based tools for studying microglia in the CNS
Masuda, T., Amann, L., Sankowski, R., Staszewski, O., Lenz, M., d´Errico, P., Snaidero, N., Costa Jordão, M. J., Böttcher, C., Kierdorf, K., et al. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-0707-4 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Central Nervous System Targets: Glial Cell Mechanisms in Chronic Pain
Donnelly, C. R., Andriessen, A. S., Chen, G., Wang, K., Jiang, C., Maixner, W. D., & Ji, R. (2020) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-020-00905-7 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Damisah, E. C., Hill, R. A., Rai, A., Chen, F., Rothlin, C. V., Ghosh, S., & Grutzendler, J. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba3239 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Kopp, K. O., Glotfelty, E. J., Li, Y., & Greig, N. H. (2022) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106550 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Microglia in Alzheimer Disease: Well-Known Targets and New Opportunities
Hemonnot, A.-L., Hua, J., Ulmann, L., & Hirbec, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00233 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
De Schepper, S., Ge, J. Z., Sierksma, A., Crowley, G., Ferreira, L. S. S., Garceau, D., Toomey, C. E., Sokolova, D., Rueda-Carrasco, J., Shin, S.-H., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01257-z · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Trem2 restrains the enhancement of tau accumulation and neurodegeneration by β-amyloid pathology
Lee, S.-H., Meilandt, W. J., Xie, L., Gandham, V. D., Ngu, H., Barck, K. H., Rezzonico, M. G., Imperio, J., Lalehzadeh, G., Huntley, M. A., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.02.010 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Specification of CNS macrophage subsets occurs postnatally in defined niches
Masuda, T., Amann, L., Monaco, G., Sankowski, R., Staszewski, O., Krueger, M., Del Gaudio, F., He, L., Paterson, N., Nent, E., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04596-2 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis in Plants: Advances and Challenges
Shaw, R., Tian, X., & Xu, J. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.10.012 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Immunometabolism in the Brain: How Metabolism Shapes Microglial Function
Bernier, L., York, E. M., & MacVicar, B. A. (2020) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.08.008 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis of the cellular heterogeneity and interactions in the injured mouse spinal cord
Milich, L. M., Choi, J. S., Ryan, C. B., Cerqueira, S. R., Benavides, S., Yahn, S. L., Tsoulfas, P., & Lee, J. K. (2021) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20210040 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Fernández-Calle, R., Konings, S. C., Frontiñán-Rubio, J., García-Revilla, J., Camprubí-Ferrer, L., Svensson, M., Martinson, I., Boza-Serrano, A., Venero, J. L., Nielsen, H. M., et al. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00566-4 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes
Lier, J., Streit, W. J., & Bechmann, I. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10092236 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Lopes, K. D. P., Snijders, G. J. L., Humphrey, J., Allan, A., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Navarro, E., Schilder, B. M., Vialle, R. A., Parks, M., Missall, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00976-y · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Cytokines in CAR T Cell–Associated Neurotoxicity
Gust, J., Ponce, R. A., Liles, W. C., Garden, G. A., & Turtle, C. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.577027 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
To Kill a Microglia: A Case for CSF1R Inhibitors
Green, K. N., Crapser, J. D., & Hohsfield, L. A. (2020) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2020.07.001 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Losurdo, M., Pedrazzoli, M., D’Agostino, C., Elia, C., Massenzio, F., Lonati, E., Mauri, M., Rizzi, L., Molteni, L., Bresciani, E., et al. (2020) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/sctm.19-0327 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Questions and (some) answers on reactive astrocytes
Escartin, C., Guillemaud, O., & Carrillo‐de Sauvage, M. (2019) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.23687 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
The Ageing Brain: Molecular and Cellular Basis of Neurodegeneration
Azam, S., Haque, M. E., Balakrishnan, R., Kim, I., & Choi, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.683459 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
A CRISPRi/a platform in human iPSC-derived microglia uncovers regulators of disease states
Dräger, N. M., Sattler, S. M., Huang, C. T.-L., Teter, O. M., Leng, K., Hashemi, S. H., Hong, J., Aviles, G., Clelland, C. D., Zhan, L., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01131-4 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Priming Microglia for Innate Immune Memory in the Brain
Neher, J. J., & Cunningham, C. M. (2019) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2019.02.001 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Microglia
Loving, B. A., & Bruce, K. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00393 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Moonen, S., Koper, M. J., Schoor, E. V., Schaeverbeke, J. M., Vandenberghe, R. R., Arnim, C. A. F. V., Tousseyn, T., Strooper, B. D., & Thal, D. R. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-022-02528-y · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Innate immunity at the crossroads of healthy brain maturation and neurodevelopmental disorders
Zengeler, K. E., & Lukens, J. R. (2021) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00487-7 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Shao, F., Wang, X., Wu, H., Wu, Q., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.825086 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Mossad, O., Batut, B., Yilmaz, B., Dokalis, N., Mezö, C., Nent, E., Nabavi, L. S., Mayer, M., Maron, F. J. M., Buescher, J. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01027-3 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Human brain organogenesis: Toward a cellular understanding of development and disease
Kelley, K. W., & Pașca, S. P. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.003 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Impact of the Human Cell Atlas on medicine
Rood, J. E., Maartens, A., Hupalowska, A., Teichmann, S. A., & Regev, A. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02104-7 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Microglia in Brain Development, Homeostasis, and Neurodegeneration
Bohlen, C. J., Friedman, B. A., Dejanovic, B., & Sheng, M. (2019) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043515 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Popova, G., Soliman, S. S., Kim, C. N., Keefe, M. G., Hennick, K. M., Jain, S., Li, T., Tejera, D., Shin, D. S., Chhun, B. B., et al. (2021) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.08.015 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationMacrophages and microglia: the cerberus of glioblastoma
Buonfiglioli, A., & Hambardzumyan, D. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-021-01156-z · Cited by 236 · see citing works
A Map of Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Regulatory Variation in Human Microglia
Young, A. M. H., Kumasaka, N., Calvert, F., Hammond, T. R., Knights, A., Panousis, N., Park, J. S., Schwartzentruber, J., Liu, J., Kundu, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00875-2 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationCien Años de Microglía: Milestones in a Century of Microglial Research
Sierra, A., Paolicelli, R. C., & Kettenmann, H. (2019) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.09.004 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Roy, E. R., Chiu, G., Li, S., Propson, N. E., Kanchi, R., Wang, B., Coarfa, C., Zheng, H., & Cao, W. (2022) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2022.03.018 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Astrocyte-immune cell interactions in physiology and pathology
Han, R. T., Kim, R. D., Molofsky, A. V., & Liddelow, S. A. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.01.013 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hammond, T. R., Dufort, C., Dissing-Olesen, L., Giera, S., Young, A., Wysoker, A., Walker, A. J., Segel, M., Nemesh, J., Saunders, A., Macosko, E., Franklin, R. J. M., Piao, X., McCarroll, S., & Stevens, B.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stevens, Beth
- ORCID
- Venue
- Immunity
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-08-31
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 253-271.e6
- ISSN
- 1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6655561
- OpenAlex
- W2901838561
- Cited by
- 2,225
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 257 · 2025: 312 · 2024: 304 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 351 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 218 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 72.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Immunity (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Simons Foundation
- International Rett Syndrome Foundation
- Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
- Rosetrees Trust
- Lundbeckfonden (R182-2014-2844)
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH112491)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Keywords
- microglia, microglial heterogeneity, microglial states, brain aging, brain injury, multiple sclerosis, reactive microglia, microglial development, single-cell RNA sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Aging, Animals, Brain, Brain Injuries, Cell Differentiation, Demyelinating Diseases, Humans, Longevity, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Multiple Sclerosis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Microglia, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review