Cited by 54Coffee research and impactsPregnancy and Medication ImpactReproductive System and Pregnancy

Changes in caffeine consumption as a signal of pregnancy

Lawson, Christina C, LeMasters, Grace K, Wilson, Kimberly A·2004·Reproductive Toxicology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this prospective study was to examine caffeine consumption and other signals of early pregnancy.Study design One hundred and five pregnant, nonsmoking, coffee drinkers ages 18-40 were enrolled by the ninth week after their last menstrual period (LMP). Participants kept daily diaries of beverage and caffeine consumption and symptoms. Urine samples were collected to assess hormone metabolites. Descriptive statistics were generated.Results During the first trimester, 96% of subjects decreased or quit drinking coffee, 65% of whom reported a unique aversion to coffee. The mean daily caffeine consumption at LMP from coffee alone was 119 mg (S.D., 105), with a range 1-574 mg. There was a 59% decrease of mean daily consumption of caffeine from coffee between weeks 4 and 6, from 96 to 39 mg. The vast majority of subjects experienced nausea (98%) and appetite loss (93%); vomiting was less prevalent (54%). The most common dietary aversions included meat, coffee, spicy foods, and dairy products. Hormone metabolite patterns are reported.Conclusion Signals of early pregnancy included an aversion to coffee in addition to nausea and vomiting, which resulted in decreased caffeine consumption. These symptoms often interfered with daily life and lasted beyond the first trimester for many. Consideration should be given that a decrease in caffeine consumption may be a signal for a healthy pregnancy and acting as a confounder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.03.004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a small cohort of 105 women who drank coffee before pregnancy, 65% reported an aversion to coffee during the first trimester, and 95% voluntarily reduced their consumption during this trimester.

    “in a small cohort of 105 women who drank coffee before pregnancy, 65% reported an aversion to coffee during the first trimester, and 95% voluntarily reduced their consumption during this trimester (171)”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [171]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawson, C. C., LeMasters, G. K., & Wilson, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Lawson, Christina C
Venue
Reproductive Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
625-633
ISSN
0890-6238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037249143
Cited by
54
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES006096, ESO6096-07)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
caffeine consumption, coffee consumption, early pregnancy, pregnancy symptoms, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, first trimester, hormone metabolites
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Black or African American, Caffeine, Coffee, Female, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Nausea, Ohio, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vomiting, Prevalence, White People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review