The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Users with experience in a technology-the lead users-are also able to shape subsequent technology development (than those originally intended) for further CE-I4.0 integration [140].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“Users of CE-I4.0 tools are expected to develop different interpretations of new technologies as they use them in practice, which can drive additional variation [140] and functions in the original design stage, for example, design for remanufactured DfRem.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“When existing I4.0 to CE approach technology reaches a point of diminishing returns, a new technology will emerge [140], e.g., from Bar code to RFID.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“Key reasons exist which emphasize the need for known technological infrastructure to support CE-DT integration. These include the turbulent and competitive markets [142] which industries and CE stakeholders operate from [140], the increasingly complex IT environment which organizations deal with, data complexity, and interconnected data networks [145].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
Gamson, W. A., & Goffman, E. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2064022 · Cited by 11,891
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,563
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 158 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Farrell, 1988, Coordination through committees and markets, The Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 235, 10.2307/2555702 · DOI
- Kaplan, S., Murray, F., in press. Technology, organizations and institutions in the construction of economic value: the case of biotechnology. In: Griffiths, D., Phillips, N., Sewell, G. (Eds.), Research on the Sociology of Organizations, Elsevier.
- Peteraf, 1997, Getting to know you: a theory of strategic group identity, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.3.CO;2-R · DOI
- Tripsas, 1997, Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S · DOI
- Tushman, 1992, Organizational determinants of technological-change – toward a sociology of technological evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 662
Kahl, S. J., & Grodal, S. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2453 · Cited by 94
A review of contemporary innovation literature: A Schumpeterian perspective
Tzeng, C.-H. (2009) · Innovation · doi:10.5172/impp.11.3.373 · Cited by 88
Entry-Timing Strategies: The Road Ahead
Fosfuri, A., Lanzolla, G., & Suárez, F. F. (2013) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.07.001 · Cited by 90
Anthony, C., Nelson, A. J., & Tripsas, M. (2016) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2016.0015 · Cited by 90
Self-citationThe Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Kallinikos, J., Gregory, R. W., Burtch, G., Chatterjee, S., & Sarker, S. (2024) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n4 · Cited by 90
Lakhani, K. R., Lifshitz‐Assaf, H., & Tushman, M. L. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1980118 · Cited by 89
The Fifth Facet: The Ecosystem as an Organizational Field
Thomas, L. D. W., & Autio, E. (2014) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2014.10306abstract · Cited by 88
Rogge, K. S., & Dütschke, E. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.009 · Cited by 97
Technological Frames in the Digital Age: Theory, Measurement Instrument, and Future Research Areas
Spieth, P., Röth, T., Clauß, T., & Klos, C. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12720 · Cited by 86
Schulze, A., MacDuffie, J. P., & Taübe, F. (2015) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtv015 · Cited by 81
Platforms, Open/User Innovation, and Ecosystems: A Strategic Leadership Perspective
Altman, E. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-332220170000037007 · Cited by 86
Gröschl, S., Gabaldón, P., & Hahn, T. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3508-4 · Cited by 85
Transformative governance of innovation ecosystems
Коннола, Т., Eloranta, V., Turunen, T., & Salo, A. A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121106 · Cited by 81
Engås, K. G., Raja, J. Z., & Neufang, I. F. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122405 · Cited by 88
Beyond Prototypes: Drivers of Market Categorization in Functional Foods and Nanotechnology
Granqvist, N., & Ritvala, T. A.-M. (2015) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12164 · Cited by 76
Kaplan, S., & Radin, J. (2011) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312711402722 · Cited by 74
Self-citationCabeza-Pullés, D., Fernández‐Pérez, V., & Bravo, M. I. R. (2019) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.008 · Cited by 79
Malhotra, A., Zhang, H., Beuse, M., & Schmidt, T. S. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104318 · Cited by 76
Hiatt, S. R., & Carlos, W. C. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2989 · Cited by 71
Omidvar, O., Safavi, M., & Glaser, V. (2022) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12819 · Cited by 81
Kriechbaum, M., Posch, A., & Hauswiesner, A. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104262 · Cited by 68
Framing Innovation Opportunities While Staying Committed to an Organizational Epistemic Stance
Fayard, A., Gkeredakis, E., & Levina, N. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0623 · Cited by 72
Entrepreneurial learning and innovation
El-Awad, Z., Gabrielsson, J., & Politis, D. (2017) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-06-2016-0177 · Cited by 69
Embedding Social Innovation: Shaping Societal Norms and Behaviors Throughout the Innovation Process
Purtik, H., & Arenas, D. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650317726523 · Cited by 81
Category Strategy for Firm Advantage
Pontikes, E. (2018) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2018.0070 · Cited by 65
Ströbl, A., Matzler, K., Nketia, B. A., & Veider, V. (2018) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0309-9 · Cited by 70
Kummitha, R. K. R. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120087 · Cited by 72
Made in Academia: The Effect of Institutional Origin on Inventors’ Attention to Science
Bikard, M. A. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1206 · Cited by 66
Minkkinen, M., Zimmer, M. P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10269-2 · Cited by 67
Zhang, N., You, D., Tang, L., & Ke, W. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104738 · Cited by 63
Sosa, M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2012 · Cited by 50
Changing the view of wind power development: More than “bricolage”
Hendry, C., & Harborne, P. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.001 · Cited by 63
Seidel, V. P., Hannigan, T. R., & Phillips, N. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0425 · Cited by 64
Technology and Innovation Management
Altman, E. J., Nagle, F., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0025 · Cited by 62
Effects of CEO duality and tenure on innovation
Li, M., & Yang, J. (2019) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-04-2019-0049 · Cited by 63
Robinson, D. K. R., Lagnau, A., & Boon, W. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.012 · Cited by 60
A social model of opportunity development: Building and engaging communities of inquiry
Shepherd, D. A., Sattari, R., & Patzelt, H. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106033 · Cited by 59
Ambidextrous Idea Generation—Antecedents and Outcomes*
Gurtner, S., & Reinhardt, R. (2016) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12353 · Cited by 58
Corporate spinoffs and analysts' coverage decisions: The implications for diversified firms
Feldman, E. R. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2397 · Cited by 57
Why matter matters: How technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies
Hoppmann, J., Anadón, L. D., & Narayanamurti, V. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103882 · Cited by 56
Valor, C., Ronda, L., & Abril, C. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.027 · Cited by 69
Keeping Steady as She Goes: A Negotiated Order Perspective on Technological Evolution
Dokko, G., Nigam, A., & Rosenkopf, L. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612443624 · Cited by 53
Lee, J., & Berente, N. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.004 · Cited by 55
The organization of technological platforms
Gawer, A. (2010) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000029022 · Cited by 55
Research on Markets for Inventions and Implications for R&D Allocation Strategies
Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.787709 · Cited by 54
Offshore oil and gas firms’ involvement in offshore wind: Technological frames and undercurrents
Hansen, G. H., & Steén, M. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.001 · Cited by 53
Corporate Innovation Strategy, Analyst Forecasting Activities and the Economic Consequences
Jia, N. (2017) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/jbfa.12242 · Cited by 51
Ernkvist, M. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.001 · Cited by 54
The means of managing momentum: Bridging technological paths and organisational fields
Schubert, C., Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.004 · Cited by 52
Measuring Up? Persistence and Change in Analysts’ Evaluative Schemas Following Technological Change
Benner, M. J., & Ranganathan, R. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1140 · Cited by 52
Institution‐Infused Sensemaking of Discontinuous Innovations: The Case of the Sharing Economy
Weber, F., Lehmann, J., Graf‐Vlachy, L., & Konig, A. S. (2019) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12499 · Cited by 59
Legal barriers to 3D cadastre implementation: What is the issue?
Ho, S., Rajabifard, A., Stoter, J., & Kalantari, M. (2013) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.010 · Cited by 51
Theeke, M., Polidoro, F., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2017) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839217747269 · Cited by 52
Vega, A., & Chiasson, M. W. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.06.001 · Cited by 51
Penttilä, K., Ravald, A., Dahl, J., & Björk, P. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.008 · Cited by 60
The Discursive Perspective of Market Categorization: Interaction, Power, and Context
Grodal, S., & Kahl, S. J. (2017) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20170000051004 · Cited by 50
Laurell, C., & Sandström, C. G. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.038 · Cited by 52
Scenario planning, cognition, and strategic investment decisions in a turbulent environment
Vecchiato, R. (2019) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.01.002 · Cited by 50
Antecedents to cognitive business model evaluation: a dynamic managerial capabilities perspective
Heubeck, T., & Meckl, R. (2021) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-021-00503-7 · Cited by 56
Grodal, S., Krabbe, A. D., & Chang-Zunino, M. (2022) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2021.0086 · Cited by 48
Ferraro, F., & Gürses, K. (2009) · European Management Review · doi:10.1057/emr.2009.24 · Cited by 48
1 Technology and Industry Evolution
Agarwal, R., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Cited by 47
Self-citationDanneels, E., Verona, G., & Provera, B. (2017) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtx049 · Cited by 50
Priem, R. L., Walters, B. A., & Li, S. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310372258 · Cited by 47
Mäntymäki, M., Hyrynsalmi, S., & Koskenvoima, A. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09913-1 · Cited by 45
Miranda, S., Wang, D., & Tian, C. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/15736 · Cited by 46
How to Accelerate Learning: Entrepreneurial Ventures Participating in Accelerator Programs
Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B. (2013) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.14803abstract · Cited by 38
Perceptions of Change in Business Relationships and Networks
Corsaro, D., & Snehota, I. (2012) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.002 · Cited by 46
Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., Milakis, D., Pangbourne, K., & Givoni, M. (2020) · Advances in transport policy and planning · doi:10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.01.001 · Cited by 53
Özcan, P., & Hannah, D. P. (2020) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2020.1366 · Cited by 46
Peering into a crystal ball: Forecasting behavior and industry foresight
Kapoor, R., & Wilde, D. U. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3450 · Cited by 43
Knowledge recombination along the technology life cycle
Kalthaus, M. (2020) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-020-00661-z · Cited by 43
Galperin, R. V. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1314 · Cited by 42
Institutional intermediaries as legitimizing agents for social enterprise in China and India
Kerlin, J. A., Lall, S., Peng, S., & Cui, T. S. (2021) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1865441 · Cited by 42
Institutional Innovation: Novel, Useful, and Legitimate
Raffaelli, R. L., & Glynn, M. A. (2015) · Cited by 41
The emergent role of value representation in managing business relationships
Corsaro, D. (2014) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.05.011 · Cited by 41
Branching and Anchoring: Complementary Asset Configurations in Conditions of Knightian Uncertainty
Lampert, C. M., Kim, M., & Polidoro, F. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0238 · Cited by 40
Bunduchi, R., Crișan-Mitra, C., Salanță, I.-I., & Crișan, E. L. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121343 · Cited by 43
Chattopadhyay, S., & Bercovitz, J. E. L. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3140 · Cited by 41
Knowing Me, Knowing You: Inventor Mobility and the Formation of Technology-oriented Alliances
Wagner, S., & Goossen, M. C. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0818 · Cited by 41
Agogué, M., Masson, P. L., & Robinson, D. K. R. (2012) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.693672 · Cited by 50
Familiarity, Creativity, and the Adoption of Category Labels in Technology Industries
Zunino, D., Suárez, F. F., & Grodal, S. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1238 · Cited by 41
Achieving a strategic fit in fintech collaboration – A case study of Nordea Bank
Riikkinen, M., & Pihlajamaa, M. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.049 · Cited by 38
Shepherd, D. A., Seyb, S., & Williams, T. A. (2023) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106290 · Cited by 46
Dominant Cognitive Frames and the Innovative Power of Social Networks
D’Andreta, D., Marabelli, M., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. A. (2016) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840615613374 · Cited by 38
Strategic thinking and business innovation: Abduction as cognitive element of leaders’ strategizing
Calabrese, A., & Costa, R. M. D. S. (2015) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.06.001 · Cited by 38
Shao, D., Zhao, S., Wang, S., & Jiang, H. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12187442 · Cited by 37
CEO research orientation, organizational context, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry
van de Wal, N., Boone, C., Gilsing, V. A., & Walrave, B. (2019) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12394 · Cited by 37
Wu, H., Han, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101756 · Cited by 36
Beyond a better mousetrap: A cultural analysis of the adoption of ethanol in Brazil
Nardon, L., & Aten, K. J. (2008) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.008 · Cited by 36
Do Market Leaders Lead in Business Process Innovation? The Case(s) of E-Business AdoptionPreprint
McElheran, K. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1618840 · Cited by 36
Cumming, D. J., Drobetz, W., Momtaz, P. P., & Schermann, N. (2024) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106450 · Cited by 35
Barros, H. M. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104097 · Cited by 35
Zhao, S., Zhang, B., Shao, D., & Wang, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132011453 · Cited by 36
Khan, S. S., Timotijević, L., Newton, R., Coutinho, D., Llerena-Ruiz, J. L., Ortega, S. T., Benighaus, L., Hofmaier, C., Xhaferri, Z., de Boer, A., et al. (2016) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.04.004 · Cited by 34
Bossink, B. A. G. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110025 · Cited by 34
Electric vehicles and rural business: Findings from the Warwickshire rural electric vehicle trial
Jones, A., Begley, J., Berkeley, N., Jarvis, D., & Bos, E. P. (2020) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.007 · Cited by 34
Luo, Z., Callaert, J., Zeng, D., & Looy, B. V. (2022) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-10-2021-0517 · Cited by 34
Klueter, T., Monteiro, L. F., & Dunlap, D. R. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.013 · Cited by 35
Corporate innovation strategy and disclosure policy
Jia, N. (2018) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-018-0709-6 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaplan, Sarah
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 790-805
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124736729
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 31.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Harvard Business School
- Dartmouth College
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- technological trajectories, technology life cycle, technological frames, co-evolutionary model, dominant design, incremental change, discontinuities, technological change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review