The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Users with experience in a technology-the lead users-are also able to shape subsequent technology development (than those originally intended) for further CE-I4.0 integration [140].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“Users of CE-I4.0 tools are expected to develop different interpretations of new technologies as they use them in practice, which can drive additional variation [140] and functions in the original design stage, for example, design for remanufactured DfRem.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“When existing I4.0 to CE approach technology reaches a point of diminishing returns, a new technology will emerge [140], e.g., from Bar code to RFID.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“Key reasons exist which emphasize the need for known technological infrastructure to support CE-DT integration. These include the turbulent and competitive markets [142] which industries and CE stakeholders operate from [140], the increasingly complex IT environment which organizations deal with, data complexity, and interconnected data networks [145].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
Gamson, W. A., & Goffman, E. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2064022 · Cited by 11,891
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,563
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 158 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Farrell, 1988, Coordination through committees and markets, The Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 235, 10.2307/2555702 · DOI
- Kaplan, S., Murray, F., in press. Technology, organizations and institutions in the construction of economic value: the case of biotechnology. In: Griffiths, D., Phillips, N., Sewell, G. (Eds.), Research on the Sociology of Organizations, Elsevier.
- Peteraf, 1997, Getting to know you: a theory of strategic group identity, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.3.CO;2-R · DOI
- Tripsas, 1997, Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S · DOI
- Tushman, 1992, Organizational determinants of technological-change – toward a sociology of technological evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 662
Klos, C., & Spieth, P. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120428 · Cited by 35
Bohn, S., & Rogge, J.-C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132499 · Cited by 36
Framing innovation success, failure, and transformation: A systematic literature review
Reynolds, O., O’Dochartaigh, A., Secchi, E., Marshall, D., & Prothero, A. (2023) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12706 · Cited by 38
Nacke, L., Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2022) · Oxford Open Energy · doi:10.1093/ooenergy/oiac002 · Cited by 35
Organizational Culture and Institutional Theory
Aten, K. J., Howard-Grenville, J. A., & Ventresca, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492611419790 · Cited by 37
The Aesthetic Evolution of Product Categories
Krabbe, A. D., & Grodal, S. (2023) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392231173677 · Cited by 37
Dutt, N., & Mitchell, W. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3159 · Cited by 31
Anchor entrepreneurship and industry catalysis: The rise of the Italian Biomedical Valley
Ferriani, S., Lazerson, M. H., & Lorenzoni, G. G. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104045 · Cited by 32
Fang, S., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111612 · Cited by 36
Product Meaning in Digital Product Innovation
Wang, G., Henfridsson, O., Nandhakumar, J., & Yoo, Y. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/15252 · Cited by 36
Li, D., Heimeriks, G. J., & Alkemade, F. (2020) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1839639 · Cited by 30
Gonzalez, J. S., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2021) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2021.1938578 · Cited by 32
Where and how does a product evolve? Product innovation pattern in product lineage
Jeong, D., & Lee, J. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102958 · Cited by 29
de Groote, J. K., Conrad, W., & Hack, A. (2020) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-020-00424-x · Cited by 31
Chai, S., Doshi, A. R., & Silvestri, L. P. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1467 · Cited by 26
Progress and setbacks: The two faces of technology emergence
Kapoor, R., & Klueter, T. M. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103874 · Cited by 28
The impact of demand-pull and technology-push policies on firms’ knowledge search
Hoppmann, J., Wu, G., & Johnson, J. A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120863 · Cited by 28
The micro-foundations of a dynamic technological capability in the automotive industry
Bağış, M., Kryeziu, L., Akbaba, Y., Ramadani, V., Karagüzel, E. S., & Krasniqi, B. A. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102060 · Cited by 28
Papachristos, G., Papadonikolaki, E., & Morgan, B. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102967 · Cited by 31
Uncertainty, vision, and the vitality of the emerging smart grid
Tricoire, A. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.028 · Cited by 28
Great Expectations: Discourse and Affect During Field Emergence
Grodal, S., & Granqvist, N. (2014) · Research on emotion in organizations · doi:10.1108/s1746-979120140000010014 · Cited by 27
Regulatory Pathways For Smart Grid Development in China
Brunekreeft, G., Luhmann, T., Menz, T., Müller, S.-U., & Recknagel, P. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-08463-9 · Cited by 27
The impact of the EU ETS on firms' investment decisions: evidence from a survey
Brohé, A., & Burniaux, S. (2015) · Carbon Management · doi:10.1080/17583004.2015.1131384 · Cited by 27
Wang, S., & Liang, Z. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101939 · Cited by 34
Dynamics of user engagement: AI mastery goal and the paradox mindset in AI–employee collaboration
Marvi, R., Foroudi, P., & AmirDadbar, N. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102908 · Cited by 35
Polidoro, F. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3196 · Cited by 26
Raffaelli, R. L., DeJordy, R., & McDonald, R. M. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0764 · Cited by 28
Sustainable city development from the perspective of corporate green innovation and governance
He, J., Wang, Q., & Wu, L. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105216 · Cited by 31
An Integrated Model of Dynamic Problem Solving Within Organizational Constraints
Cromwell, J. R., Amabile, T. M., & Harvey, J. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813238-8.00003-6 · Cited by 27
Building a bridge to the future: Prospective legitimation in nascent markets
Harmon, D. J., Rhee, E. Y., & Cho, Y. H. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3506 · Cited by 26
Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context
Yildiz, H. E., Murtic, A., & Zander, U. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123039 · Cited by 33
Valuing Virtual Worlds: The Role of Categorization in Technology Assessment
Nardon, L., & Aten, K. J. (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00311 · Cited by 25
Ravasi, D., & Canato, A. (2010) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000029011 · Cited by 25
Digital Technologies: Carrier or Trigger for Institutional Change in Digital Transformation?
Berente, N., & Seidel, S. (2022) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20220000083008 · Cited by 24
Nelson, A. J., Anthony, C., & Tripsas, M. (2023) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392231163178 · Cited by 28
Self-citationEMERGENCE OF CLOUD COMPUTING : AN INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION PERSPECTIVE
Su, N. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 24
Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2018) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2018.1520971 · Cited by 24
Kratochvil, R. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105107 · Cited by 26
Vecchiato, R., Favato, G., Maddaloni, F., & Hang, D. (2020) · Futures & Foresight Science · doi:10.1002/ffo2.25 · Cited by 20
Choosing Technology: An Entrepreneurial Strategy Approach
Gans, J. S., Kearney, M., Scott, E. L., & Stern, S. (2020) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2020.0115 · Cited by 23
Category innovation in the software industry: 1990–2002
Pontikes, E. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3383 · Cited by 23
Schildt, H., Lahdenranta, K., Demir, R., & Turunen, T. (2023) · The Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2022.2162530 · Cited by 19
Jacobides, M. G., Candelon, F., Krayer, L., Round, K., & Chen, W. (2023) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2023.2279051 · Cited by 23
A value perspective on relationship portfolios
Corsaro, D., Fiocca, R., Henneberg, S. C. M., & Tunisini, A. (2013) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593113483766 · Cited by 23
Hameed, T., von Staden, P., & Kwon, K.-S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10051397 · Cited by 25
Peine, A. (2011) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-011-9180-4 · Cited by 21
Moretti, D., Baum, C. M., Ehlers, M., Finger, R., & Bröring, S. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122270 · Cited by 24
Lu, C., & Li, B. (2023) · Journal of Digital Economy · doi:10.1016/j.jdec.2023.06.001 · Cited by 22
Tschang, F. T., & Ertug, G. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1067 · Cited by 21
Components, systems and discontinuities: The case of magnetic recording and playback equipment
Funk, J. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.007 · Cited by 22
Petkova, A. P. (2016) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2015.24 · Cited by 22
Vecchiato, R. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103958 · Cited by 23
The processes of ecosystem emergence
Thomas, L. D. W., & Autio, E. (2015) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.10453abstract · Cited by 22
Bunduchi, R., Sitar‐Tăut, D., & Mican, D. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124095 · Cited by 27
Strategic reframing as a multi-level process enabled with scenario research
Mukherjee, M., Ramírez, R., & Cuthbertson, R. W. (2019) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101933 · Cited by 23
MacPherson, J., Rosman, A., Helming, K., & Burkhard, B. (2024) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104222 · Cited by 28
A model of cognitive and operational memory of organizations in changing worlds
Giovanni Dosi, A., Luigi Marengo, B., Paraskevopoulou, E., & Valente, M. (2016) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bew067 · Cited by 20
Technology Legitimation: A Product‐Level Examination Across the Technology Lifecycle
Bunduchi, R., & Candi, M. (2021) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12562 · Cited by 22
The framing of product ideas in the making: a case study of the development of an energy saving pump
Gish, L., & Clausen, C. (2013) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.832746 · Cited by 21
An Introduction to the Field of Technology Entrepreneurship: Editorial to the Special Issue
Harms, R., & Walsh, S. T. (2015) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12159 · Cited by 20
Leo, E. M. (2019) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12515 · Cited by 21
Institutional pioneers and articulation work in digital platform infrastructure-building
Palmer, M., Toral, İ., Truong, Y., & Lowe, F. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.067 · Cited by 22
Catching-up during technological windows of opportunity: An industry product categories perspective
Giachetti, C., & Mensah, D. T. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104677 · Cited by 19
Disentangling the automotive technology structure: a patent co-citation analysis
Castriotta, M., & Guardo, M. C. D. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1862-0 · Cited by 19
A new perspective on the innovator's dilemma - exploring the role of entrepreneurial incentives
Berglund, H., & Sandström, C. G. (2017) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2017.085692 · Cited by 19
Why and How Firms Implement Internal Crowdsourcing Platforms
Beretta, M., Frederiksen, L., Wallin, M. W., & Kulikovskaja, V. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3045118 · Cited by 21
Plantec, Q., Masson, P. L., & Weil, B. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120782 · Cited by 19
Chen, P., Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Tan, D. (2017) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1251 · Cited by 19
Attoh, E. M. N. A. N., & Amarnath, G. (2025) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2025.100689 · Cited by 20
Overcoming the Incumbent Dilemma: The Dual Roles of Multimarket Contact During Disruption
Hsu, S. T., & Cohen, S. K. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12719 · Cited by 18
Being ethically resilient during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study of Indian supply chain companies
Verma, S., Garg, N., & Arumugam, T. (2022) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-05-2022-0203 · Cited by 21
Convergence Research as a ‘System-of-Systems’: A Framework and Research Agenda
Gajary, L. C., Misra, S., Desai, A., Evasius, D. M., Frechtling, J. A., Pendlebury, D., Schnell, J. D., Silverstein, G., & Wells, J. (2023) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-023-09503-1 · Cited by 21
The industrial emergence of commercial inkjet printing
Ford, S. J., Routley, M. J., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2014) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-01-2013-0002 · Cited by 18
Mechanisms of Technology Re-Emergence and Identity Change in a Mature Field: Swiss Watchmaking
Raffaelli, R. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.13784abstract · Cited by 18
Introduction to ‘Markets in sustainability transitions’
Boon, W., Magnusson, T., & Hyysalo, S. (2022) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.08.006 · Cited by 18
Strategic framing of enabling technologies: Insights from firms digitizing smell and taste
Bojovic, N. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104469 · Cited by 20
Won, S., & Bidwell, M. J. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3502 · Cited by 17
Startup category membership and boundary expansion in the field of artificial intelligence
Truong, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-08-2022-0773 · Cited by 20
Lo, J. Y.-C., Nag, R., Xu, L., & Istri, S. D. A. A. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103911 · Cited by 17
Ojansivu, I. T., Medlin, C. J., Andersen, P. H., & Kim, W. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.10.008 · Cited by 17
The Influence of Analysts on Innovation: An Evolutionary View of Evaluative Frames
Benner, M. J., & Beunza, D. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0122 · Cited by 16
The half-life of knowledge and strategic human capital
Knudsen, E. S., & Lien, L. B. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100989 · Cited by 16
The Road Not Taken: Technological Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Innovations
Tan, D. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1567 · Cited by 17
Digital consumption and socio-normative vulnerability
Kanungo, R. P., Gupta, S., Patel, P., Prikshat, V., & Liu, R. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121808 · Cited by 19
Modic, D., & Rončević, B. (2018) · Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1163/15691330-12341452 · Cited by 16
Platforms, Open/User Innovation, and Ecosystems: A Strategic Leadership PerspectivePreprint
Altman, E. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2915213 · Cited by 18
Chen, X., & Lloyd, A. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-05-2021-0379 · Cited by 20
Poplawska, J., Labib, A., & Reed, D. M. (2016) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0028-z · Cited by 15
The Role of Trade Associations in Market Discourse and Cognition
Kahl, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492616688855 · Cited by 15
Grimm, V., Kretschmer, S., & Mehl, S. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111474 · Cited by 15
Daneshjoovash, S. K., Jafari, P., & Khamseh, A. (2020) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2020.1789825 · Cited by 16
Unleashing creative potential: The role of stable institutional ownership in exploratory innovation
Deng, X., Ali, H., & Aboelkheir, H. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105166 · Cited by 14
Yue, L. Q., & Wang, J. (2023) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503231182666 · Cited by 14
Kumar, A., & Operti, E. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3543 · Cited by 14
Learning from Inconsistent Performance Feedback
Chambers, C. R., Alves, M. F. R., & Aceves, P. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.16833 · Cited by 17
Sköld, M., Freij, Å., & Frishammar, J. (2019) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12345 · Cited by 14
Assessing the technology contribution to value added
Fernandes, A. S. C. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.05.010 · Cited by 14
CUTTING YOUR TEETH: LEARNING FROM ENTREPRENEURIAL EXPERIENCES.
Eesley, C. E., & Roberts, E. B. (2010) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2010.54493446 · Cited by 14
The growth of hidden champions in China: a cognitive explanation from integrated view
Lei, L., Wu, X., & Tan, Z. (2020) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-06-2019-0206 · Cited by 14
Wang, C., Medaglia, R., & Jensen, T. B. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10050-3 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaplan, Sarah
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 790-805
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124736729
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 31.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Harvard Business School
- Dartmouth College
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- technological trajectories, technology life cycle, technological frames, co-evolutionary model, dominant design, incremental change, discontinuities, technological change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review