CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 662Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingInnovation and Knowledge ManagementEconomic Theory and Institutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change

Open access
Kaplan, Sarah, Tripsas, Mary·2008·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 158 references

10 of the 158 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Farrell, 1988, Coordination through committees and markets, The Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 235, 10.2307/2555702 · DOI
  2. Kaplan, S., Murray, F., in press. Technology, organizations and institutions in the construction of economic value: the case of biotechnology. In: Griffiths, D., Phillips, N., Sewell, G. (Eds.), Research on the Sociology of Organizations, Elsevier.
  3. Peteraf, 1997, Getting to know you: a theory of strategic group identity, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.3.CO;2-R · DOI
  4. Tripsas, 1997, Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S · DOI
  5. Tushman, 1992, Organizational determinants of technological-change – toward a sociology of technological evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 662

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Sarah
ORCID
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
790-805
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
OpenAlex
W3124736729
Cited by
661
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard Business School
  • Dartmouth College
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
technological trajectories, technology life cycle, technological frames, co-evolutionary model, dominant design, incremental change, discontinuities, technological change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review