Cited by 113Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Prevalence and Correlates of Psychotropic Medication Use in Adolescents with an Autism Spectrum Disorder with and without Caregiver-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
Frazier, Thomas W., Shattuck, Paul T., Narendorf, Sarah Carter, Cooper, Benjamin P., Wagner, Mary, Spitznagel, Edward L.·2011·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many youths with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) benefit from psychotropic medication treatment of co-morbid symptom patterns consistent with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The lack of clear indications and algorithms to direct clinical practice has led to a very poor understanding of overall medication use for these youths. The present study examined the prevalence of psychotropic medication use compared across individuals with an ASD without a caregiver-reported ADHD diagnosis (ASD-only), ADHD without ASD (ADHD-only), and an ASD with co-morbid ADHD (ASD+ADHD). Correlates of medication use were also examined. METHODS: Data on psychotropic medication from the first wave of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2, a nationally representative study of adolescents ages 13-17 in special education, were used to compare the prevalence of medication use across the three groups, overall and by class. Separate logistic regression models were constructed for each group to examine the correlates of psychotropic medication use. Poisson regression models were used to examine correlates of the number of medications. RESULTS: Youths with ASD+ADHD had the highest rates of use (58.2%), followed by youths with ADHD-only (49.0%) and youths with ASD-only (34.3%). Youths with an ASD, both ASD-only and ASD+ADHD, used medications across a variety of medication classes, whereas stimulants were dominant among youths with ADHD-only. African American youths with ASD-only and with ASD+ADHD were less likely to receive medication than white youths, whereas race was not associated with medication use in the ADHD-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Clearer practice parameters for ADHD have likely contributed to more consistency in treatment, whereas treatment for ASD reflects a trial and error approach based on associated symptom patterns. Additional studies examining the treatment of core and associated ASD symptoms are needed to guide pharmacologic treatment of these youths. Interventions targeting African American youths with ASD and the physicians who serve them are also warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2011.0057

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Andersen RM, Davidson PL: Improving access to care in America: Individual and contextual indicators. In: Changing the US Healthcare System: Key Issues in Health Services Policy and Manage- ment, edited by R.M. Andersen, T.H. Rice, G.F. Kominsky. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 3-31, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frazier, T. W., Shattuck, P. T., Narendorf, S. C., Cooper, B. P., Wagner, M., & Spitznagel, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • SRI International (US)
Corresponding author
Frazier, Thomas W.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-12
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
571-579
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W1967703564
Cited by
113
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Organization for Autism Research
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Case Western Reserve University (UL1RR024989)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01mh086489-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH086489)., R01-MH086489-01, T32 MH19960, T32MH019960)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 024989, UL1RR024989)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
psychotropic drug use, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, comorbidities, adolescents, stimulants, racial disparities, African American youth, special education, National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, drug use prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Drug Utilization, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychotropic Drugs, United States, Models, Statistical, Caregivers, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review