Cited by 295Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Psychotropic medication use among Medicaid-enrolled children with autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Mandell, David S., Morales, Knashawn H., Marcus, Steven C., Stahmer, Aubyn C., Doshi, Jalpa, Polsky, Daniel E.·2008·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide national estimates of psychotropic medication use among Medicaid-enrolled children with autism spectrum disorders and to examine child and health system characteristics associated with psychotropic medication use. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used Medicaid claims for calendar year 2001 from all 50 states and Washington, DC, to examine 60,641 children with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. Logistic regression with random effects was used to examine the child, county, and state factors associated with psychotropic medication use. RESULTS: Of the sample, 56% used at least 1 psychotropic medication, 20% of whom were prescribed > or = 3 medications concurrently. Use was common even in children aged 0 to 2 years (18%) and 3 to 5 years (32%). Neuroleptic drugs were the most common psychotropic class (31%), followed by antidepressants (25%) and stimulants (22%). In adjusted analyses, male, older, and white children; those who were in foster care or in the Medicaid disability category; those who received additional psychiatric diagnoses; and those who used more autism spectrum disorder services were more likely to have used psychotropic drugs. Children who had a diagnosis of autistic disorder or who lived in counties with a lower percentage of white residents or greater urban density were less likely to use such medications. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic medication use is common among even very young children with autism spectrum disorders. Factors unrelated to clinical presentation seem highly associated with prescribing practices. Given the limited evidence base, there is an urgent need to assess the risks, benefits, and costs of medication use and understand the local and national policies that affect medication use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-0984

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mandell et al. reported that 56% were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication and 20% were prescribed three or more.

    “Mandell et al. reported that 56% were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication and 20% were prescribed three or more [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Findling R. Pharmacologic treatment of behavior symptoms in autism and pervasive developmental disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(suppl 10):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [26]Quality Resource Systems, Inc. Area Resource File. Fairfax, VA: Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. [30]Bonferroni C. The calculation for the protection against groups of tests. Studies in Honor of Professor Salvatore Ortu Carboni. [in Italian] Rome, Italy. 1935:13–60. [Google Scholar]
  4. [47]Kaiser Commission of Medicaid and the Uninsured. Health Coverage for Low-Income Populations: A Comparison of Medicaid and SCHIP. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2006. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mandell, D. S., Morales, K. H., Marcus, S. C., Stahmer, A. C., Doshi, J., & Polsky, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
e441-e448
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1980023413
Cited by
295
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH077000)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
psychotropic drug use, autism spectrum disorder, Medicaid, children, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, stimulants, prescribing patterns, foster care, county-level factors, racial and ethnic disparities, urban density
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Attitude of Health Personnel, Autistic Disorder, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Utilization, Eligibility Determination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Probability, Psychotropic Drugs, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review