Cited by 176Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A meta-analysis of behavioral parent training for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Lee, Pei-chin, Niew, Wern-ing, Yang, Hao-jan, Chen, Vincent Chin-hung, Lin, Keh-chung·2012·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the effect of behavioral parent training on child and parental outcomes for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Meta-analytic procedures were used to estimate the effect of behavioral parent training on children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Variables moderating the intervention effect were examined. Forty studies were included and generated an overall moderate effect size at post-treatment and a small effect size at follow-up. The majority of outcome categories were associated with a moderate effect size at post-treatment that decreased to a small effect size at follow-up. Parenting competence was the only outcome that had a large effect, which decreased to moderate at follow-up. The strength of the effect differed between questionnaire and observation measures. Behavioral parent training is an effective intervention for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Sustainability of the effects over time is a problem that awaits further scrutiny. Recommendations for further research and clinical practices are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.011

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, P.-C., Niew, W.-I., Yang, H.-J., Chen, V. C.-H., & Lin, K.-C.
Affiliations
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (TW)
  • National Kaohsiung Normal University (TW)
  • Chung Shan Medical University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Keh-chung
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
2040-2049
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124620143
Cited by
176
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC (96-2413-H-040-004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
behavioral parent training, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, parenting competence, child behavior problems, parental outcomes, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Parents, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review