Cited by 290Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsChild Therapy and Development

A comparison of three family therapy programs for treating family conflicts in adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Barkley, Russell A., Guevremont, David C., Anastopoulos, Arthur D., Fletcher, Kenneth E.·1992·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Sixty-one 12- to 18-year-olds were randomized to 8-10 sessions of behavior management training (n = 20), problem-solving and communication training (n = 21), or structural family therapy (n = 20). Families were assessed at pre- and posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. All treatments resulted in significant reductions in negative communication, conflicts, and anger during conflicts and improved ratings of school adjustment, reduced internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and decreased maternal depressive symptoms. Most outcomes remained stable between posttreatment and follow-up, and some continued to improve over this time. Despite group improvements, analyses of clinically significant change and clinical recovery within Ss showed that only 5-30% reliably improved from treatment and only 5-20% recovered following treatment. The three treatments did not differ in these rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.60.3.450

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkley, R. A., Guevremont, D. C., Anastopoulos, A. D., & Fletcher, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1992-06
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
450-462
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2082284232
Cited by
290
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh041583-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 41583)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adolescents, family therapy, family conflict, behavior management training, structural family therapy, negative communication, anger, school adjustment, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, maternal depressive symptoms, treatment outcome comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Conflict, Psychological, Family, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Language Tests, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Parents, Personality Inventory, Socioeconomic Factors, Video Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review