Cited by 51Family and Disability Support ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The effectiveness of a group triple P with Chinese parents who have a child with developmental disabilities: a randomized controlled trial

Leung, Cynthia, Fan, Angel, Sanders, Matthew R.·2013·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

The study examined the effectiveness of Group Triple P, a Level 4 variant of the Triple P multilevel system of parenting support, with Chinese parents who had a preschool aged child with a developmental disability, using randomized controlled trial design. Participants (Intervention group: 42; Waitlist Control group: 39) completed measures on child behaviour, parental stress, dysfunctional discipline styles and parental conflict before and after program completion by the Intervention group. Intervention group participants also completed these same measures six months after program completion. Compared to the Waitlist Control group, parents receiving Group Triple P reported significantly lower levels of child behaviour problems, parental stress, dysfunctional discipline style and parental conflict scores. The Intervention group participants maintained their gains six months after program completion. The results provided promising evidence for the Level 4 Group Triple P as an effective intervention program for Chinese parents who have preschool aged children with developmental disabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.023

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leung, C., Fan, A., & Sanders, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Leung, Cynthia
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
976-984
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089517827
Cited by
51
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
parenting support, developmental disabilities, Chinese parents, preschool children, child behavior problems, parental stress, parental conflict, intervention effectiveness, maintenance of gains
MeSH terms
Adult, Child Behavior, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, China, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review