CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 440

Response to ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’

Brown, T.W., Bischof-Niemz, T., Blok, K., Breyer, C., Lund, H., Mathiesen, B.V.·2018·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.113

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variable renewable energy technologies are likely to form the backbone of transitioning to net zero in most European countries.

    “Therefore, these variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies are likely to form the backbone of transitioning to net zero in most European countries1,8.”

    From Long-duration electricity storage needs for coping with Dunkelflaute events in Europe (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 175

  1. Core Writing Team, R. Pachauri, L. Meyer (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014. URL https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
  2. J. Cochran, T. Mai, M. Bazilian, Meta-analysis of high penetration re- newable energy scenarios, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 246 -253. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.089. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.089 · DOI
  3. M. Jacobson, M. Delucchi, Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials, Energy Policy 39 (3) (2011) 1154- 1169. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040. · DOI
  4. M. Delucchi, M. Jacobson, Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies, Energy Policy 39 (3) (2011) 1170-1190. doi:10.1016/j. enpol.2010.11.045. · DOI
  5. S. Teske, J. Muth, S. Sawyer, T. Pregger, S. Simon, T. Naegler, M. O'Sullivan, energy [r]evolution: a sustainable world energy outlook, 4th edition, Tech. rep., Greenpeace International, European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) (2012).
  6. M. Z. Jacobson, M. A. Delucchi, M. A. Cameron, B. A. Frew, Low- cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (49) (2015) 15060-15065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510028112. · DOI
  7. B. Elliston, M. Diesendorf, I. MacGill, Simulations of scenarios with 100% renewable electricity in the Australian National Electricity Mar- ket, Energy Policy 45 (2012) 606 -613. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2012.03.011. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.011 · DOI
  8. B. Elliston, I. MacGill, M. Diesendorf, Least cost 100% renewable elec- tricity scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market, Energy Policy 59 (0) (2013) 270 -282. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03. 038. · DOI
  9. H. Lund, B. Mathiesen, Energy system analysis of 100% renewable en- ergy systems -The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050, Energy 34 (5) (2009) 524 -531, 4th Dubrovnik Conference. doi:10.1016/j. energy.2008.04.003. · DOI
  10. D. Connolly, H. Lund, B. Mathiesen, M. Leahy, The first step to- wards a 100% renewable energy-system for Ireland, Applied Energy 88 (2) (2011) 502 -507, the 5th Dubrovnik Conference on Sustain- able Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, held in Dubrovnik September/October 2009. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2010.03.006. · DOI
  11. C. Budischak, D. Sewell, H. Thomson, L. Mach, D. E. Veron, W. Kemp- ton, Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and elec- trochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time, Journal of Power Sources 225 (2013) 60 -74. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour. 2012.09.054. · DOI
  12. W. D. Grossmann, I. Grossmann, K. W. Steininger, Distributed solar electricity generation across large geographic areas, Part I: A method to optimize site selection, generation and storage, Renewable and Sustain- able Energy Reviews 25 (2013) 831 -843. doi:10.1016/j.rser. 2012.08.018. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.018 · DOI
  13. G. Pleßmann, M. Erdmann, M. Hlusiak, C. Breyer, Global Energy Stor- age Demand for a 100% Renewable Electricity Supply, Energy Procedia 46 (2014) 22 -31, 8th International Renewable Energy Storage Confer- ence and Exhibition (IRES 2013). doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014. 01.154. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.154 · DOI
  14. D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, North-East Asian Super Grid for 100% renew- able energy supply: Optimal mix of energy technologies for electricity, gas and heat supply options, Energy Conversion and Management 112 (2016) 176 -190. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.019. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.019 · DOI
  15. M. Huber, A. Roger, T. Hamacher, Optimizing long-term investments for a sustainable development of the asean power system, Energy 88 (2015) 180 -193. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.065. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.065 · DOI
  16. G. Czisch, Szenarien zur zukünftigen Stromversorgung: Kostenopti- mierte Variationen zur Versorgung Europas und seiner Nachbarn mit Strom aus erneuerbaren Energien, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Kassel (2005). URL https://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/bitstream/ urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-200604119596/1/DissVersion0502. pdf
  17. F. Steinke, P. Wolfrum, C. Hoffmann, Grid vs. storage in a 100% renew- able Europe, Renewable Energy 50 (2013) 826 -832. doi:10.1016/ j.renene.2012.07.044. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.044 · DOI
  18. M. G. Rasmussen, G. B. Andresen, M. Greiner, Storage and balancing synergies in a fully or highly renewable pan-European power system, Energy Policy 51 (2012) 642 -651, renewable Energy in China. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.009. URL 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.009 · DOI
  19. S. Hagspiel, C. Jägemann, D. Lindenburger, T. Brown, S. Cherevatskiy, E. Tröster, Cost-optimal power system extension under flow-based mar- ket coupling, Energy 66 (2014) 654-666. doi:10.1016/j.energy. 2014.01.025. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 · DOI
  20. D. Connolly, H. Lund, B. Mathiesen, Smart Energy Europe: The techni- cal and economic impact of one potential 100% renewable energy sce- nario for the European Union, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re- views 60 (2016) 1634 -1653. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.025. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.025 · DOI
  21. C. Bussar, P. Stöcker, Z. Cai, L. M. Jr., D. Magnor, P. Wiernes, N. van Bracht, A. Moser, D. U. Sauer, Large-scale integration of renewable en- ergies and impact on storage demand in a European renewable power system of 2050-Sensitivity study, Journal of Energy Storage 6 (2016) 1 -10. doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004 · DOI
  22. D. Dominković, I. Bačeković, B. Ćosić, G. Krajačić, T. Pukšec, N. Duić, N. Markovska, Zero carbon energy system of south east europe in 2050, Applied Energy 184 (2016) 1517 -1528. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2016.03.046. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.046 · DOI
  23. W. D. Grossmann, I. Grossmann, K. W. Steininger, Solar electricity gen- eration across large geographic areas, Part II: A Pan-American energy system based on solar, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 32 (2014) 983 -993. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.003. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.003 · DOI
  24. M. Huber, C. Weissbart, On the optimal mix of wind and solar genera- tion in the future Chinese power system, Energy 90 (2015) 235 -243. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.146. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.146 · DOI
  25. S. Becker, B. A. Frew, G. B. Andresen, T. Zeyer, S. Schramm, M. Greiner, M. Z. Jacobson, Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: Optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions, Energy 72 (2014) 443 -458. doi:10.1016/j.energy. 2014.05.067. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.067 · DOI
  26. M. Child, C. Breyer, Vision and initial feasibility analysis of a recar- bonised Finnish energy system for 2050, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 66 (2016) 517 -536. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016. 07.001. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.001 · DOI
  27. B. Mathiesen, H. Lund, D. Connolly, H. Wenzel, P. Østergaard, B. Möller, S. Nielsen, I. Ridjan, P. Karnøe, K. Sperling, F. Hvelplund, Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and trans- port solutions, Applied Energy 145 (2015) 139 -154. doi:10.1016/ j.apenergy.2015.01.075. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.075 · DOI · Paper page
  28. A. Palzer, H.-M. Henning, A comprehensive model for the German electricity and heat sector in a future energy system with a dominant contribution from renewable energy technologies -Part II: Results, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30 (2014) 1019 -1034. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.032. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.032 · DOI
  29. D. Connolly, B. Mathiesen, A technical and economic analysis of one potential pathway to a 100% renewable energy system, International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 1 (0) (2014) 7-28. doi:10.5278/ijsepm.2014.1.2. URL https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2014.1.2 · DOI
  30. L. Fernandes, P. Ferreira, Renewable energy scenarios in the Portuguese electricity system, Energy 69 (2014) 51 -57. doi:10.1016/j. energy.2014.02.098. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.098 · DOI
  31. C. Moeller, J. Meiss, B. Mueller, M. Hlusiak, C. Breyer, M. Kast- ner, J. Twele, Transforming the electricity generation of the Berlin-Brandenburg region, Germany, Renewable Energy 72 (2014) 39 -50. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.042. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.042 · DOI
  32. C. Breyer, D. Bogdanov, A. Gulagi, A. Aghahosseini, L. S. Barbosa, O. Koskinen, M. Barasa, U. Caldera, S. Afanasyeva, M. Child, J. Farfan, P. Vainikka, On the role of solar photovoltaics in global energy transition scenarios, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 25 (8) (2017) 727-745, pIP-16-176.R2. doi:10.1002/pip.2885. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.2885 · DOI
  33. C. Breyer, D. Bogdanov, A. Aghahosseini, A. Gulagi, M. Child, A. S. Oyewo, J. Farfan, K. Sadovskaia, P. Vainikka, Solar photovoltaics de- mand for the global energy transition in the power sector, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications n/a-n/aPIP-17-137.R1. doi: 10.1002/pip.2950. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.2950 · DOI
  34. M. Z. Jacobson, M. A. Delucchi, Z. A. Bauer, S. C. Goodman, W. E. Chapman, M. A. Cameron, C. Bozonnat, L. Chobadi, H. A. Clonts, P. Enevoldsen, J. R. Erwin, S. N. Fobi, O. K. Goldstrom, E. M. Hen- nessy, J. Liu, J. Lo, C. B. Meyer, S. B. Morris, K. R. Moy, P. L. O'Neill, I. Petkov, S. Redfern, R. Schucker, M. A. Sontag, J. Wang, E. Weiner, A. S. Yachanin, 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World, Joule 1 (2017) 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  35. M. Z. Jacobson, M. A. Delucchi, M. A. Cameron, B. V. Mathiesen, Matching demand with supply at low cost in 139 countries among 20 world regions with 100% intermittent wind, water, and sunlight (wws) for all purposes, Renewable Energydoi:10.1016/j.renene.2018. 02.009. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  36. A. Gulagi, D. Bogdanov, M. Fasihi, C. Breyer, Can Australia Power the Energy-Hungry Asia with Renewable Energy?, Sustainability 9 (2). doi:10.3390/su9020233. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020233 · DOI · Paper page
  37. A. Gulagi, D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, A Cost Optimized Fully Sustainable Power System for Southeast Asia and the Pacific Rim, Energies 10 (5). doi:10.3390/en10050583. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/en10050583 · DOI
  38. G. Pleßmann, P. Blechinger, How to meet EU GHG emission reduction targets? A model based decarbonization pathway for Europe's electricity supply system until 2050, Energy Strategy Reviews 15 (2017) 19 -32. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003 · DOI
  39. D. Schlachtberger, T. Brown, S. Schramm, M. Greiner, The benefits of cooperation in a highly renewable European electricity network, Energy 134 (2017) 469 -481. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.004. · DOI
  40. J. Hörsch, T. Brown, The role of spatial scale in joint optimisations of generation and transmission for European highly renewable scenarios, in: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on the European En- ergy Market (EEM 2017), 2017. doi:10.1109/EEM.2017.7982024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07617 · DOI
  41. H. C. Gils, Y. Scholz, T. Pregger, D. L. de Tena, D. Heide, Integrated modelling of variable renewable energy-based power supply in Europe, Energy 123 (2017) 173 -188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.01.115. URL 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.115 · DOI
  42. E. H. Eriksen, L. J. Schwenk-Nebbe, B. Tranberg, T. Brown, M. Greiner, Optimal heterogeneity in a simplified highly renewable European elec- tricity system, Energy 133 (2017) 913 -928. doi:10.1016/j. energy.2017.05.170. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.170 · DOI
  43. F. Cebulla, T. Naegler, M. Pohl, Electrical energy storage in highly re- newable european energy systems: Capacity requirements, spatial dis- tribution, and storage dispatch, Journal of Energy Storage 14 (2017) 211 -223. doi:10.1016/j.est.2017.10.004. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2017.10.004 · DOI
  44. T. Brown, D. Schlachtberger, A. Kies, S. Schramm, M. Greiner, Syner- gies of sector coupling and transmission extension in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05290 · arXiv
  45. G. Pleßmann, P. Blechinger, Outlook on South-East European power system until 2050: Least-cost decarbonization pathway meeting EU mit- igation targets, Energydoi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.076. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.076 · DOI
  46. L. d. S. N. S. Barbosa, D. Bogdanov, P. Vainikka, C. Breyer, Hydro, wind and solar power as a base for a 100% renewable energy supply for South and Central America, PLOS ONE 12 (3) (2017) 1-28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173820. URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173820 · DOI
  47. A. Aghahosseini, D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, A Techno-Economic Study of an Entirely Renewable Energy-Based Power Supply for North America for 2030 Conditions, Energies 10 (8). doi:10.3390/en10081171. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081171 · DOI
  48. A. Gulagi, D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, The role of storage technologies in energy transition pathways towards achieving a fully sustainable en- ergy system for India, Journal of Energy Storagedoi:10.1016/j.est. 2017.11.012. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2017.11.012 · DOI
  49. A. Gulagi, P. Choudhary, D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, Electricity system based on 100% renewable energy for India and SAARC, PLOS ONE 12 (7) (2017) 1-27. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180611. URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180611 · DOI
  50. A. Blakers, B. Lu, M. Stocks, 100% renewable electricity in Australia, Energy 133 (2017) 471 -482. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.05. 168. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.168 · DOI
  51. B. Lu, A. Blakers, M. Stocks, 90-100% renewable electricity for the South West Interconnected System of Western Australia, Energy 122 (2017) 663 -674. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.077. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.077 · DOI
  52. L. de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, J. F. Orozco, D. Bogdanov, P. Vainikka, C. Breyer, Hydropower and Power-to-gas Storage Options: The Brazilian Energy System Case, Energy Procedia 99 (2016) 89 -107, 10th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, IRES 2016, 15-17 March 2016, Düsseldorf, Germany. doi:10.1016/j.egypro. 2016.10.101. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.101 · DOI
  53. A. Aghahosseini, D. Bogdanov, N. Ghorbani, C. Breyer, Analysis of 100% renewable energy for Iran in 2030: integrating solar PV, wind energy and storage, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technologydoi:10.1007/s13762-017-1373-4. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1373-4 · DOI
  54. A. Sadiqa, A. Gulagi, C. Breyer, Energy transition roadmap towards 100% renewable energy and role of storage technologies for Pakistan by 2050, Energy 147 (2018) 518 -533. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018. 01.027. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.027 · DOI
  55. U. Caldera, D. Bogdanov, S. Afanasyeva, C. Breyer, Role of Seawa- ter Desalination in the Management of an Integrated Water and 100% Renewable Energy Based Power Sector in Saudi Arabia, Water 10 (1). doi:10.3390/w10010003. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010003 · DOI
  56. A. Kilickaplan, D. Bogdanov, O. Peker, U. Caldera, A. Aghahosseini, C. Breyer, An energy transition pathway for Turkey to achieve 100% re- newable energy powered electricity, desalination and non-energetic in- dustrial gas demand sectors by 2050, Solar Energy 158 (2017) 218 - 235. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.030. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.030 · DOI
  57. M. Child, C. Breyer, D. Bogdanov, H.-J. Fell, The role of storage technologies for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Ukraine, Energy Procedia 135 (2017) 410 -423, 11th International Re- newable Energy Storage Conference, IRES 2017, 14-16 March 2017, Düsseldorf, Germany. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.513. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.513 · DOI
  58. H. C. Gils, S. Simon, Carbon neutral archipelago -100% renewable energy supply for the Canary Islands, Applied Energy 188 (2017) 342 - 355. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.023. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.023 · DOI
  59. M. Child, A. Nordling, C. Breyer, Scenarios for a sustainable energy system in the Åland Islands in 2030, Energy Conversion and Manage- ment 137 (2017) 49 -60. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.039. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.039 · DOI
  60. E. Martinot, C. Dienst, L. Weiliang, C. Qimin, Renewable energy fu- tures: Targets, scenarios, and pathways, Annual Review of Environ- ment and Resources 32 (1) (2007) 205-239. doi:10.1146/annurev. energy.32.080106.133554. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.080106. 133554 · DOI
  61. T. Trainer, Can renewables etc. solve the greenhouse problem? the neg- ative case, Energy Policy 38 (8) (2010) 4107 -4114. doi:10.1016/j. enpol.2010.03.037. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.037 · DOI
  62. T. Trainer, A critique of jacobson and delucchi's proposals for a world renewable energy supply, Energy Policy 44 (2012) 476 -481. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.037. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.037 · DOI
  63. C. T. M. Clack, S. A. Qvist, J. Apt, M. Bazilian, A. R. Brandt, K. Caldeira, S. J. Davis, V. Diakov, M. A. Handschy, P. D. H. Hines, P. Jaramillo, D. M. Kammen, J. C. S. Long, M. G. Morgan, A. Reed, V. Sivaram, J. Sweeney, G. R. Tynan, D. G. Victor, J. P. Weyant, J. F. Whitacre, Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (26) (2017) 6722-6727. doi:10.1073/ pnas.1610381114. URL https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610381114 · DOI
  64. T. Trainer, Can europe run on renewable energy? a negative case, Energy Policy 63 (2013) 845 -850. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.027. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.027 · DOI
  65. P. J. Loftus, A. M. Cohen, J. C. S. Long, J. D. Jenkins, A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasi- bility?, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6 (1) (2015) 93-112. doi:10.1002/wcc.324. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.324 · DOI
  66. M. A. Delucchi, M. Z. Jacobson, Response to "a critique of jacobson and delucchi's proposals for a world renewable energy supply" by ted trainer, Energy Policy 44 (2012) 482 -484. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2011.10.058. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.058 · DOI
  67. M. Z. Jacobson, M. A. Delucchi, Response to trainer's second commen- tary on a plan to power the world with wind, water, and solar power, Energy Policy 57 (2013) 641 -643. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012. 11.014. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.014 · DOI
  68. M. Z. Jacobson, M. A. Delucchi, M. A. Cameron, B. A. Frew, The united states can keep the grid stable at low cost with 100% clean, renewable energy in all sectors despite inaccurate claims, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (26) (2017) E5021-E5023. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708069114. URL https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708069114 · DOI
  69. B. Heard, B. Brook, T. Wigley, C. Bradshaw, Burden of proof: A com- prehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity sys- tems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76 (2017) 1122 - 1133. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114. · DOI
  70. B. W. Brook, C. J. A. Bradshaw, Key role for nuclear energy in global biodiversity conservation, Conservation Biology 29 (3) (2015) 702-712. doi:10.1111/cobi.12433. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12433 · DOI
  71. B. P. Heard, B. W. Brook, Closing the Cycle: How South Australia and Asia Can Benefit from Re-inventing Used Nuclear Fuel Management, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 4 (1) (2017) 166-175, aPPS-2016- 0025.R2. doi:10.1002/app5.164. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app5.164 · DOI
  72. B. W. Brook, T. Blees, T. M. L. Wigley, S. Hong, Silver buckshot or bullet: Is a future 'energy mix' necessary?, Sustainability 10 (2). doi: 10.3390/su10020302. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020302 · DOI
  73. L. Clarke, K. Jiang, K. Akimoto, M. Babiker, G. Blanford, K. Fisher- Vanden, J.-C. Hourcade, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, D. M. A. Löschel, S. Palt- sev, S. Rose, P. Shukla, M. Tavoni, B. van der Zwaan, , D. van Vu- uren, Assessing Transformation Pathways, in: O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs- Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J. Minx (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014. URL https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/
  74. J. Kaldellis, 4 -feasibility assessment for stand-alone and hybrid wind energy systems, in: J. Kaldellis (Ed.), Stand-Alone and Hybrid Wind En- ergy Systems, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Woodhead Pub- lishing, 2010, pp. 102 -161. doi:10.1533/9781845699628.1.102. URL https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845699628.1.102 · DOI
  75. G. Bekele, B. Palm, Feasibility study for a standalone solar-wind-based hybrid energy system for application in ethiopia, Applied Energy 87 (2) (2010) 487 -495. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.006. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.006 · DOI
  76. L. Castro-Santos, A. Filgueira-Vizoso, L. Carral-Couce, J. Ángel Fraguela Formoso, Economic feasibility of floating offshore wind farms, Energy 112 (2016) 868 -882. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.06. 135. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.135 · DOI
  77. S. Rodrigues, R. Torabikalaki, F. Faria, N. Cafôfo, X. Chen, A. R. Ivaki, H. Mata-Lima, F. Morgado-Dias, Economic feasibility analysis of small scale pv systems in different countries, Solar Energy 131 (2016) 81 -95. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.019. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.019 · DOI
  78. E. Tsupari, T. Arponen, V. Hankalin, J. Kärki, S. Kouri, Feasibility comparison of bioenergy and co2 capture and storage in a large com- bined heat, power and cooling system, Energy 139 (2017) 1040 -1051. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.022. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.022 · DOI
  79. I. Ridjan, B. V. Mathiesen, D. Connolly, N. Duić, The feasibility of syn- thetic fuels in renewable energy systems, Energy 57 (2013) 76 -84. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.046. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.046 · DOI
  80. A. E. MacDonald, , C. T. M. Clack, A. Alexander, A. Dunbar, J. Wilczak, Y. Xie, Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions, Nature Climate Change 6 (2017) 526-531. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2921. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2921 · DOI
  81. R. Rodriguez, S. Becker, G. Andresen, D. Heide, M. Greiner, Transmis- sion needs across a fully renewable European power system, Renewable Energy 63 (2014) 467-476. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.005. · DOI
  82. D. Millstein, R. Wiser, M. Bolinger, G. Barbose, The climate and air- quality benefits of wind and solar power in the United States, Nature Energy 6 (17134). doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.134. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.134 · DOI
  83. D. Arent, R. Tol, E. Faust, J. Hella, S. Kumar, K. Strzepek, F. Tóth, , D. Yan, Key economic sectors and services, in: C. Field, V. Barros, D. Dokken, K. Mach, M. Mastrandrea, T. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. Ebi, Y. Estrada, R. Genova, B. Girma, E. Kissel, A. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. Mastrandrea, L. White (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adap- tation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contri- bution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Inter- governmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 659- 708, https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/ WGIIAR5-Chap10_FINAL.pdf.
  84. S. Teske, S. Sawyer, O. Schäfer, T. Pregger, S. Simon, T. Naegler, en- ergy [r]evolution: a sustainable world energy outlook, 5th edition, Tech.
  85. H. Lund, Renewable Energy Systems: A Smart Energy Systems Ap- proach to the Choice and Modeling of 100% Renewable Solutions, 2nd ed., Academic Press (Elsevier), 2014.
  86. Sustainable Energy for All 2013-2014 : Global Tracking Framework, Tech. rep., World Bank and International Energy Agency (2014). doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0200-3. · DOI
  87. I. Staffell, D. Brett, N. Brandon, A. Hawkes, A review of domestic heat pumps, Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (2012) 9291-9306. doi:10.1039/ C2EE22653G. URL https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE22653G · DOI
  88. B. V. Mathiesen, H. Lund, D. Connolly, Limiting biomass consumption for heating in 100% renewable energy systems, Energy 48 (1) (2012) 160 -168, 6th Dubrovnik Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy Water and Environmental Systems, SDEWES 2011. doi:10. 1016/j.energy.2012.07.063. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.063 · DOI
  89. H. Lund, S. Werner, R. Wiltshire, S. Svendsen, J. E. Thorsen, F. Hvelplund, B. V. Mathiesen, 4th generation district heating (4gdh), Energy 68 (2014) 1 -11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089 · DOI
  90. D. Connolly, H. Lund, B. Mathiesen, S. Werner, B. Möller, U. Pers- son, T. Boermans, D. Trier, P. Østergaard, S. Nielsen, Heat Roadmap Europe: Combining district heating with heat savings to decarbonise the EU energy system, Energy Policy 65 (2014) 475 -489. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.035. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.035 · DOI
  91. D. P. van Vuuren, J. Edmonds, M. Kainuma, K. Riahi, A. Thomson, K. Hibbard, G. C. Hurtt, T. Kram, V. Krey, J.-F. Lamarque, T. Masui, M. Meinshausen, N. Nakicenovic, S. J. Smith, S. K. Rose, The repre- sentative concentration pathways: an overview, Climatic Change 109 (1) (2011) 5. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z. · DOI · Paper page
  92. F. Creutzig, P. Agoston, J. C. Goldschmidt, G. Luderer, G. Nemet, R. C. Pietzcker, The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate cli- mate change, Nature Energy 2. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.140. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 · DOI · Paper page
  93. C. St. Martin, J. Lundquist, M. Handschy, Variability of intercon- nected wind plants: correlation length and its dependence on vari- ability time scale, Environmental Research Letters 10 (2015) 044004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044004. URL http://stacks.iop.org/1748-9326/10/i=4/a=044004 · DOI
  94. H. Holttinen, J. Kiviluoma, A. Estanqueiro, E. Gómez-Lázaro, B. Rawn, J. Dobschinski, P. Meibom, E. Lannoye, T. Aigner, Y. H. Wan, M. Mil- ligan, Variability of load and net load in case of large scale distributed wind power, in: 10th Wind Integration Workshop, Aarhus, 2011. URL https://www.ieawind.org/task_25/PDF/W1W/ WIWAarhus_Task%2025%20Variability%20paper%20final.pdf
  95. B. Ernst, Analysis of wind power ancillary services characteristics with German 250-MW wind data, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (1999). doi:10.2172/752651. · DOI
  96. B. Ernst, T. Bischof-Niemz, R. van Heerden, C. Mushwana, Balancing wind energy within the South African power system, in: 15th Wind In- tegration Workshop, Vienna, 2016.
  97. J. Deane, G. Drayton, B. O. Gallachóir, The impact of sub-hourly mod- elling in power systems with significant levels of renewable generation, Applied Energy 113 (2014) 152 -158. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2013.07.027. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.027 · DOI
  98. N. Troy, D. Flynn, M. O'Malley, The importance of sub-hourly model- ing with a high penetration of wind generation, in: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2012, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/ PESGM.2012.6345631. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2012.6345631 · DOI
  99. C. O'Dwyer, D. Flynn, Using energy storage to manage high net load variability at sub-hourly time-scales, IEEE Transactions on Power Sys- tems 30 (4) (2015) 2139-2148. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2356232. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2356232 · DOI
  100. I. DIMOULKAS, M. AMELIN, F. LEVIHN, District heating system operation in power systems with high share of wind power, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy 5 (6) (2017) 850-862. doi: 10.1007/s40565-017-0344-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-017-0344-6 · DOI
  101. S. Pfenninger, Dealing with multiple decades of hourly wind and PV time series in energy models: A comparison of methods to reduce time resolution and the planning implications of inter-annual variability, Ap- plied Energy 197 (2017) 1 -13. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017. 03.051. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.051 · DOI
  102. A. Schröder, F. Kunz, J. Meiss, R. Mendelevitch, C. von Hirschhausen, Current and prospective costs of electricity generation until 2050, Data Documentation, DIW 68, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80348, accessed July 2016 (2013).
  103. S. Roehrkasten, D. Schaeuble, S. Helgenberger, Secure and sustainable power generation in a water-constrained world, IASSdoi:10.2312/ iass.2015.023. URL https://doi.org/10.2312/iass.2015.023 · DOI
  104. F. Ueckerdt, L. Hirth, G. Luderer, O. Edenhofer, System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables?, Energy 63 (2013) 61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.072. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.072 · DOI
  105. L. Hirth, F. Ueckerdt, O. Edenhofer, Integration costs revisited -An economic framework for wind and solar variability, Renewable Energy 74 (2015) 925-939. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.065. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.065 · DOI
  106. D. Hess, M. Wetzel, K.-K. Cao, Representing node-internal transmission and distribution grids in energy system models, Renewable Energy 119 (2018) 874 -890. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.041. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.041 · DOI
  107. T. Brown, P. Schierhorn, E. Tröster, T. Ackermann, Optimising the European transmission system for 77% renewable electricity by 2030, IET Renewable Power Generation 10 (1) (2016) 3-9. doi:10.1049/ iet-rpg.2015.0135. · DOI
  108. S. Becker, R. Rodriguez, G. Andresen, S. Schramm, M. Greiner, Trans- mission grid extensions during the build-up of a fully renewable pan- European electricity supply, Energy 64 (2014) 404-418. doi:10. 1016/j.energy.2013.10.010. · DOI
  109. Siemens, The stable way: Synchronous condenser solutions (2014). URL https://w3.usa.siemens.com/smartgrid/us/en/ events/Documents/IEEE%202016/TS_Synchronous_Condenser. pdf
  110. A. Orths, P. B. Eriksen, The future has come: the 100% res driven power system is reality, Revue de l'Electricité et de l'Electronique 5. doi: 10.23723/1301:2016-5/17783. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.23723/1301:2016-5/17783 · DOI
  111. 138Danish Electrical Grid Independent of Centralised Power Plants for 41 Days (2018). URL https://stateofgreen.com/ en/profiles/state-of-green/news/ danish-electrical-grid-independent-of-centralised-power-plants-for-41-days · DOI
  112. N. W. Miller, Keeping it together: Transient stability in a world of wind and solar generation, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 13 (6) (2015) 31-39. doi:10.1109/MPE.2015.2461332. · DOI
  113. H. Urdal, R. Ierna, J. Zhu, C. Ivanov, A. Dahresobh, D. Rostom, Sys- tem strength considerations in a converter dominated power system, IET Renewable Power Generation 9 (2015) 10-17(7). doi:10.1049/ iet-rpg.2014.0199. · DOI
  114. J. Kueck, B. Kirby, T. Rizy, F. Li, N. Fall, Reactive power from dis- tributed energy, The Electricity Journal 19 (10) (2006) 27 -38. doi: 10.1016/j.tej.2006.10.007. · DOI
  115. F. O. Igbinovia, G. Fandi, Z. Müller, J. Švec, J. Tlusty, Cost implication and reactive power generating potential of the synchronous condenser, in: 2016 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG), 2016, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/IGBSG.2016. 7539450. · DOI
  116. B. Kroposki, B. Johnson, Y. Zhang, V. Gevorgian, P. Denholm, B. M. Hodge, B. Hannegan, Achieving a 100% renewable grid: Operating electric power systems with extremely high levels of variable renew- able energy, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 15 (2) (2017) 61-73. doi:10.1109/MPE.2016.2637122. · DOI
  117. M. Milligan, B. Frew, B. Kirby, M. Schuerger, K. Clark, D. Lew, P. Denholm, B. Zavadil, M. O'Malley, B. Tsuchida, Alternatives no more: Wind and solar power are mainstays of a clean, reliable, af- fordable grid, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 13 (6) (2015) 78-87. doi:10.1109/MPE.2015.2462311. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2015.2462311 · DOI
  118. J. MacDowell, S. Dutta, M. Richwine, S. Achilles, N. Miller, Serving the Future: Advanced Wind Generation Technology Supports Ancillary Services, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 13 (6) (2015) 22-30. doi: 10.1109/MPE.2015.2461331. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2015.2461331 · DOI
  119. R. Ierna, J. Zhu, A. J. Roscoe, M. Yu, A. Dysko, C. D. Booth, H. Urdal, Effects of VSM convertor control on penetration limits of non-synchronous generation in the GB power system, in: 15th Wind Integration Workshop, 2016, this paper was presented at the 15th Wind Integration Workshop and published in the workshop's proceedings. URL http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/58052/
  120. A. J. Roscoe, M. Yu, R. Ierna, J. Zhu, A. Dyśko, H. Urdal, C. Booth, A VSM (virtual synchronous machine) convertor control model suit- able for RMS studies for resolving system operator/owner challenges, in: 15th Wind Integration Workshop, 2016, this paper was presented at the 15th Wind Integration Workshop and published in the workshop's proceedings. URL http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/58053/
  121. Y. Chen, R. Hesse, D. Turschner, H. P. Beck, Improving the grid power quality using virtual synchronous machines, in: 2011 International Con- ference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives, 2011, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/PowerEng.2011.6036498. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/PowerEng.2011.6036498 · DOI
  122. V. Karapanos, S. de Haan, K. Zwetsloot, Real time simulation of a power system with VSG hardware in the loop, in: IECON 2011 -37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2011, pp. 3748- 3754. doi:10.1109/IECON.2011.6119919. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2011.6119919 · DOI
  123. Q. C. Zhong, G. Weiss, Synchronverters: Inverters that mimic syn- chronous generators, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58 (4) (2011) 1259-1267. doi:10.1109/TIE.2010.2048839. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2048839 · DOI
  124. M. Torres, L. Lopes, Virtual Synchronous Generator: A Control Strategy to Improve Dynamic Frequency Control in Autonomous Power Systems, Energy and Power Engineering 5 (2A) (2013) 32-38. doi:10.4236/ epe.2013.52A005. URL https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.52A005 · DOI
  125. H. Bevrani, T. Ise, Y. Miura, Virtual synchronous generators: A survey and new perspectives, International Journal of Electrical Power & En- ergy Systems 54 (2014) 244 -254. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2013. 07.009. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009 · DOI
  126. T. Jouini, C. Arghir, F. Dörfler, Grid-Friendly Matching of Synchronous Machines by Tapping into the DC Storage, IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (22) (2016) 192 -197, 6th IFAC Workshop on Distributed Estimation and Control in Networked Systems NECSYS 2016. doi:10.1016/j. ifacol.2016.10.395. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.395 · DOI
  127. M. Sinha, F. Dörfler, B. B. Johnson, S. V. Dhople, Uncovering Droop Control Laws Embedded Within the Nonlinear Dynamics of Van der Pol Oscillators, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 4 (2) (2017) 347-358. doi:10.1109/TCNS.2015.2503558. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2015.2503558 · DOI
  128. E. S. News, California battery's black start capability hailed as 'major accomplishment in the energy industry' (2017). URL https://www.energy-storage.news/news/ california-batterys-black-start-capability-hailed-as-major-accomplishment-i [166] Uranium 2016: Resources, Production and Demand, Tech. rep., Nuclear Energy Agency and International Atomic Energy Agency (2016). · DOI
  129. D. Abbott, Is Nuclear Power Globally Scalable?, Proceedings of the IEEE 99 (10) (2011) 1611-1617. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011. 2161806. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2161806 · DOI
  130. R. Perez, M. Perez, A fundamental look at supply side energy reserves for the planet, IEA SHC. URL https://www.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/ publications/2015-11-A-Fundamental-Look-at-Supply-Side-Energy-Reserves-for-the-Planet. pdf · DOI · Paper page
  131. A. Verbruggen, Renewable and nuclear power: A common future?, En- ergy Policy 36 (11) (2008) 4036 -4047, transition towards Sustainable Energy Systems. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.024. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.024 · DOI
  132. T. Hamacher, M. Huber, J. Dorfner, K. Schaber, A. M. Bradshaw, Nu- clear fusion and renewable energy forms: Are they compatible?, Fusion Engineering and Design 88 (6) (2013) 657 -660, proceedings of the 27th Symposium On Fusion Technology (SOFT-27); Liège, Belgium, September 24-28, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.01.074. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.01.074 · DOI
  133. A. David, B. V. Mathiesen, H. Averfalk, S. Werner, H. Lund, Heat Roadmap Europe: Large-Scale Electric Heat Pumps in District Heat- ing Systems, Energies 10 (4). doi:10.3390/en10040578. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040578 · DOI
  134. T. B. Cochran, H. A. Feiveson, Z. Mian, M. V. Ramana, M. Schneider, F. N. von Hippel, It's time to give up on breeder reactors, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 66 (3) (2010) 50-56. doi:10.2968/066003007. URL https://doi.org/10.2968/066003007 · DOI
  135. Summary for Policy Makers, in: O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J. Minx (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014. URL https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/
  136. O. Schmidt, A. Hawkes, A. Gambhir, I. Staffell, The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates, Nature Energy 2 (17110). doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.110. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.110 · DOI
  137. N. Kittner, F. Lill, D. M. Kammen, Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition, Nature Energy 2 (17125). doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.125. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.125 · DOI
  138. S. Afanasyeva, C. Breyer, M. Engelhard, Impact of battery cost on the economics of hybrid photovoltaic power plants, Energy Procedia 99 (2016) 157 -173, 10th International Renewable Energy Storage Con- ference, IRES 2016, 15-17 March 2016, Düsseldorf, Germany. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.107. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.107 · DOI
  139. X. Luo, J. Wang, M. Dooner, J. Clarke, Overview of current develop- ment in electrical energy storage technologies and the application po- tential in power system operation, Applied Energy 137 (2015) 511 - 536. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081 · DOI · Paper page
  140. M. Götz, J. Lefebvre, F. Mörs, A. M. Koch, F. Graf, S. Bajohr, R. Reimert, T. Kolb, Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review, Renewable Energy 85 (2016) 1371 -1390. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 · DOI
  141. S. Rönsch, J. Schneider, S. Matthischke, M. Schlüter, M. Götz, J. Lefeb- vre, P. Prabhakaran, S. Bajohr, Review on methanation -From funda- mentals to current projects, Fuel 166 (2016) 276 -296. doi:10.1016/ j.fuel.2015.10.111. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.111 · DOI
  142. The Fuel Cell Industry Review 2016, Tech. rep., E4tech (2016).
  143. H. Lund, P. Østergaard, D. Connolly, I. Ridjan, B. Mathiesen, F. Hvelplund, J. Thellufsen, P. Sorknæs, Energy Storage and Smart En- ergy Systems, International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 11 (0). doi:10.5278/ijsepm.2016.11.2. URL https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2016.11.2 · DOI
  144. B. V. Mathiesen, H. Lund, Comparative analyses of seven technologies to facilitate the integration of fluctuating renewable energy sources, IET Renewable Power Generation 3 (2) (2009) 190-204. doi:10.1049/ iet-rpg:20080049. URL https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg:20080049 · DOI
  145. F. Creutzig, N. H. Ravindranath, G. Berndes, S. Bolwig, R. Bright, F. Cherubini, H. Chum, E. Corbera, M. Delucchi, A. Faaij, J. Fargione, H. Haberl, G. Heath, O. Lucon, R. Plevin, A. Popp, C. Robledo-Abad, S. Rose, P. Smith, A. Stromman, S. Suh, O. Masera, Bioenergy and cli- mate change mitigation: an assessment, GCB Bioenergy 7 (5) (2015) 916-944. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12205 · DOI · Paper page
  146. E. G. Lindfeldt, M. Saxe, M. Magnusson, F. Mohseni, Strategies for a road transport system based on renewable resources -The case of an import-independent Sweden in 2025, Applied Energy 87 (6) (2010) 1836 -1845. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.011. · DOI
  147. R. Lund, B. V. Mathiesen, Large combined heat and power plants in sustainable energy systems, Applied Energy 142 (Supplement C) (2015) 389 -395. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.013. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.013 · DOI
  148. J. Pires, F. Martins, M. Alvim-Ferraz, M. Simões, Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: An overview, Chemical Engineering Re- search and Design 89 (9) (2011) 1446 -1460, special Issue on Carbon Capture & Storage. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.028. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.028 · DOI
  149. M. E. Boot-Handford, J. C. Abanades, E. J. Anthony, M. J. Blunt, S. Brandani, N. Mac Dowell, J. R. Fernandez, M.-C. Ferrari, R. Gross, J. P. Hallett, R. S. Haszeldine, P. Heptonstall, A. Lyngfelt, Z. Makuch, E. Mangano, R. T. J. Porter, M. Pourkashanian, G. T. Rochelle, N. Shah, J. G. Yao, P. S. Fennell, Carbon capture and storage update, Energy En- viron. Sci. 7 (2014) 130-189. doi:10.1039/C3EE42350F. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3EE42350F · DOI · Paper page
  150. D. Y. Leung, G. Caramanna, M. M. Maroto-Valer, An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies, Re- newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39 (2014) 426 -443. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · DOI · Paper page
  151. D. McLaren, A comparative global assessment of potential negative emissions technologies, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 90 (6) (2012) 489 -500, special Issue: Negative emissions technology. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.005. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.005 · DOI
  152. S. L. Seigo, S. Dohle, M. Siegrist, Public perception of carbon capture and storage (ccs): A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re- views 38 (2014) 848 -863. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.017. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.017 · DOI
  153. H. Lund, B. V. Mathiesen, The role of carbon capture and storage in a future sustainable energy system, Energy 44 (1) (2012) 469 - 476, integration and Energy System Engineering, European Sympo- sium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering 2011. doi:10.1016/ j.energy.2012.06.002. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.002 · DOI
  154. M. Fasihi, D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants, Energy Procedia 99 (2016) 243 -268, 10th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, IRES 2016, 15-17 March 2016, Düsseldorf, Germany. doi:10.1016/j.egypro. 2016.10.115. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.115 · DOI
  155. M. Fasihi, D. Bogdanov, C. Breyer, Long-term hydrocarbon trade op- tions for the maghreb region and europe-renewable energy based syn- thetic fuels for a net zero emissions world, Sustainability 9 (2). doi: 10.3390/su9020306. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020306 · DOI
  156. D. W. Keith, Why capture co2 from the atmosphere?, Science 325 (5948) (2009) 1654-1655. doi:10.1126/science.1175680. URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175680 · DOI
  157. P. Williamson, Emissions reduction: Scrutinize co2 removal methods, Nature 530 (2016) 153-155. doi:10.1038/530153a. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/530153a · DOI
  158. C.-F. Schleussner, J. Rogelj, M. Schaeffer, T. Lissner, R. Licker, E. M. Fischer, R. Knutti, A. Levermann, K. Frieler, W. Hare, Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal, Na- ture Climate Change 6 (2016) 827 EP -, perspective. doi:10.1038/ nclimate3096. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096 · DOI
  159. D. P. van Vuuren, A. F. Hof, M. A. E. van Sluisveld, K. Riahi, Open dis- cussion of negative emissions is urgently needed, Nature Energy 2 (12) (2017) 902-904. doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2 · DOI
  160. J. Rockström, O. Gaffney, J. Rogelj, M. Meinshausen, N. Nakicen- ovic, H. J. Schellnhuber, A roadmap for rapid decarbonization, Science 355 (6331) (2017) 1269-1271. doi:10.1126/science.aah3443. URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443 · DOI · Paper page
  161. K. Anderson, G. Peters, The trouble with negative emissions, Science 354 (6309) (2016) 182-183. arXiv:http://science.sciencemag. org/content/354/6309/182.full.pdf, doi:10.1126/science. aah4567. URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567 · DOI · Paper page
  162. N. E. Vaughan, C. Gough, Expert assessment concludes negative emis- sions scenarios may not deliver, Environmental Research Letters 11 (9) (2016) 095003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095003. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095003 [213] Special Eurobarometer 459 Report: Climate Change (2017). doi:10. 2834/92702. URL https://doi.org/10.2834/92702 · DOI
  163. Y. Maruyama, M. Nishikido, T. Iida, The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation, Energy Policy 35 (5) (2007) 2761 -2769. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010 · DOI
  164. A. Jobert, P. Laborgne, S. Mimler, Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies, Energy Policy 35 (5) (2007) 2751 -2760. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12. 005. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005 · DOI
  165. P. Enevoldsen, B. K. Sovacool, Examining the social acceptance of wind energy: Practical guidelines for onshore wind project development in France, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53 (2016) 178 - 184. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.041. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.041 · DOI
  166. D. Schlachtberger, T. Brown, M. Schäfer, S. Schramm, M. Greiner, Cost optimal scenarios of a future highly renewable European electricity sys- tem: Exploring the influence of weather data, cost parameters and policy constraints. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09711 · arXiv
  167. J. J. Cohen, J. Reichl, M. Schmidthaler, Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review, Energy 76 (2014) 4 -9. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.056. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.056 · DOI
  168. R. Galvin, Trouble at the end of the line: Local activism and social acceptance in low-carbon electricity transmission in Lower Franconia, Germany, Energy Research & Social Science 38 (2018) 114 -126. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.022. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.022 · DOI
  169. S. Pfenninger, J. DeCarolis, L. Hirth, S. Quoilin, I. Staffell, The impor- tance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind?, Energy Policy 101 (2017) 211 -215. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016. 11.046. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.046 · DOI
  170. S. Pfenninger, L. Hirth, I. Schlecht, E. Schmid, F. Wiese, T. Brown, C. Davis, M. Gidden, H. Heinrichs, C. Heuberger, S. Hilpert, U. Krien, C. Matke, A. Nebel, R. Morrison, B. Müller, G. Pleßmann, M. Reeg, J. C. Richstein, A. Shivakumar, I. Staffell, T. Tröndle, C. Wingenbach, Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned, Energy Strategy Reviews 19 (2018) 63 -71. doi:10.1016/ j.esr.2017.12.002. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002 · DOI
  171. M. Child, O. Koskinen, L. Linnanen, C. Breyer, Sustainability guardrails for energy scenarios of the global energy transition, Renewable and Sus- tainable Energy Reviews 91 (2018) 321 -334. doi:10.1016/j.rser. 2018.03.079. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.079 · DOI · Paper page
  172. P. L. Joskow, Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable elec- tricity generating technologies, The American Economic Review 101 (3) (2011) 238-241. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.238. URL https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.238 · DOI
  173. M. Z. Jacobson, Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security, Energy Environ. Sci. 2 (2009) 148-173. doi:10. 1039/B809990C. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B809990C · DOI
  174. A. Verbruggen, E. Laes, S. Lemmens, Assessment of the actual sus- tainability of nuclear fission power, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 32 (2014) 16 -28. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.008. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.008 · DOI
  175. 229Tokelau becomes the world's first 100% solar powered country, press Release (Nov 2012). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. egypro.2016.10.107. URL https://www.sma.de/en/newsroom/ current-news/news-details/news/ 3943-tokelau-becomes-the-worlds-first-100-solar-powered-country. html · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, T. W., Bischof-Niemz, T., Blok, K., Breyer, C., Lund, H., & Mathiesen, B. V.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
92
Pages
834-847
ISSN
1364-0321
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.113
Cited by
440
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Helmholtz Association (VH-NG-1352)
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (03SF0472C)
  • RE-INVEST project (6154-00022B)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review