Cited by 25Social Media in Health EducationPharmaceutical industry and healthcarePharmacy and Medical Practices

Pharmacists' perceptions of professionalism on social networking sites

Benetoli, Arcelio, Chen, Timothy F., Schaefer, Marion, Chaar, Betty, Aslani, Parisa·2017·Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Abstract

Background Social networking sites (SNS) are a new venue for communication, and health care professionals, like the general population, are using them extensively. However, their behavior on SNS may influence public perceptions about their professionalism.Objective This study explored how pharmacists separate professional and personal information and activities on SNS, their perceptions of professional behavior on SNS, and opinions on guidelines in this area.Methods In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with international practising pharmacists (n = 31) recruited from a range of countries (n = 9). Initially, pharmacists known to the research team were invited, and thereafter, participants were recruited using a snowballing technique. The interviews lasted from 30 to 120 min. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed.Results A majority of participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on SNS, and about one third adopted a separation strategy where professional information and activities were clearly separated from personal ones (e.g. two different SNS accounts, or one particular SNS for professional use and another platform for personal purposes). Most participants expressed concern over how pharmacists present themselves and behave in SNS when they reported (un)professional behaviors of peers they had observed. Examples of perceived unprofessional behaviors included revealing details of personal life and activities; open complaints about the pharmacy sector, co-workers, physicians, and patients; inappropriate description of pharmacists' roles and activities; and breaches of patient confidentiality. Positive professional behaviors, such as expression of compassion for patients, examples of effective patient management, promotion of pharmacists' role, and correction of misleading health information being spread online were also observed. There was no consensus on having professional social media guidelines. Some preferred SNS to be unregulated while most believed certain guidance was needed to maintain high professional standards in the online environment.Conclusions A definitive strategy to separate professional and personal information and activities on SNS was not adopted by most pharmacists. E-professionalism issues could negatively impact on the standing of individual practitioners and the profession. Most agreed that education about SNS use would be beneficial; however, support for guidelines or regulations for pharmacists' use of SNS was not unanimous.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.05.044

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benetoli, A., Chen, T. F., Schaefer, M., Chaar, B., & Aslani, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Aslani, Parisa
Venue
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
575-588
ISSN
1551-7411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2419413507
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
pharmacists, social networking sites, professional conduct, professionalism, e-professionalism, social media policy, patient confidentiality, online professional conduct, public perception of pharmacists
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Perception, Pharmacists, Guidelines as Topic, Professional Role, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review