Cited by 172Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health and Patient Involvement

Psychometric properties of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)

Law, Heather, Neil, Sandra T., Dunn, Graham, Morrison, Anthony P.·2014·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

The latent structure, reliability and validity of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) (Neil et al., 2009) were examined in a sample of participants with experience of psychosis (N=335). The original two factor model proposed by Neil et al. (2009) was examined using exploratory factor analysis followed by a further independent exploratory factor analysis to test revised solutions. Model fit statistics indicated that the most interpretable solution was a one factor model using 15 items from the original measure. Internal consistency, test re-test reliability and convergent validity of this new 15 item version were found to be high. Recommendations for the utility of the QPR in routine clinical practice along with suggestions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.011

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, H., Neil, S. T., Dunn, G., & Morrison, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Law, Heather
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
156
Issue
2-3
Pages
184-189
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115041319
Cited by
172
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1086)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
psychosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review