Cited by 274Heavy metals in environmentAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Effect of modified coconut shell biochar on availability of heavy metals and biochemical characteristics of soil in multiple heavy metals contaminated soil

Liu, Huakang, Xu, Fei, Xie, Yanluo, Wang, Can, Zhang, Akang, Li, Lingling, Xu, Heng·2018·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

On account of the potential in immobilizing metals and improving soil environment, various biochar materials have been extensively applied in environmental remediation. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of modified coconut shell biochar (MCSB) on the availability of metals and soil biological activity in multi-metals (cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni) and zinc (Zn)) contaminated soil. MCSB was obtained from coconut shell biochar (CSB) by hydrochloric acid pickling and ultrasonication, which has significantly improved its surface functional groups and microcosmic pore structure. Sandy soil samples were incubated at 25 °C amended with MCSB or CSB by 0%, 2.5% and 5% addition for 63 days, respectively. The results showed that the acid soluble Cd, Ni and Zn decreased by 30.1%, 57.2% and 12.7%, respectively, in groups with 5% MCSB addition, which indicated MCSB had a better effect on immobilizing metals compared with CSB. In addition, higher soil biological activities were detected in different treatments compared with control (CK). Especially, the maximum bacterial number was found in 5% MCSB treatment, which increased by 149.43% compared with CK. Accordingly, our results suggested that MCSB could be used as an ameliorant to immobilize heavy metals in contaminated soils and improve soil physicochemical and biological properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.115

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Xu, F., Xie, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, A., Li, L., & Xu, H.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Heng
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
645
Pages
702-709
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884703259
Cited by
274
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Supportive Project of Sichuan Province (2016NZ0050, 2018RZ0110)
  • Agricultural science and Technology Achievements Transformation Program of Sichuan Province (2017NZZJ008)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0188, 2017SZ0181)
  • National Science and Technology Supporting Program (2015BAD05B01-5)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
heavy metal immobilization, cadmium, nickel, zinc, multi-metal contaminated soil, hydrochloric acid pickling, sonication, soil microbial activity, soil bacterial abundance, soil physicochemical properties, sandy soil, soil amendment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review